Azure Backup vs. Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Backup is a cloud backup service.
$5
Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM) is an enterprise backup and recovery system that contributes to BCDR strategy by facilitating the backup and recovery of enterprise data.N/A
Pricing
Azure BackupMicrosoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Editions & Modules
Storage in GB/Month
$0.0224 to $0.0569
per GB
Backup Instance <50GB
$5.00 + storage consumed
Backup Instance > 50 GB but < or = 500 GB
$10.00 + storage consumed
Backup Instance Instance is > 500 GB
$10 for each 500 GB increment + storage consumed
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure BackupMicrosoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure BackupMicrosoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Considered Both Products
Azure Backup
Chose Azure Backup
Azure Backup, Commvault, Acronis Data Protector, and Veeam Backup are popular backup solutions that offer similar functionality to protect data and applications.Azure Backup vs CommvaultCommvault is a comprehensive data backup and recovery solution that covers everything from …
Chose Azure Backup
Azure Backup is cheaper however Veeam is more visually pleasing and allows you to send the backups to other places including Azure, or other competitors remote DR vaults.
Chose Azure Backup
Azure supports on-premises and cloud-based servers, and IBM supports only IBM Cloud-based servers. IBM Cloud Backup has costs 7x higher than Azure.
Chose Azure Backup
Cost and SLA were important [in our] decision to prefer Azure Backup over others. The customization of existing policy with an archive of data was not available in competitors so we had preferred Azure Backup.
Chose Azure Backup
Azure Backup works on Azure, the most famous of the cloud systems that the whole world has switched to, which is now a very large part of the Microsoft ecosystem that we have been used to using for years. Therefore, it is less tiring to use the additional service of an …
Chose Azure Backup
I won't say Azure Backup stacks up against these mentioned backup solutions, they're just for different approaches/implementations.
Depending on your requirements, you may have a mix of Azure Backups for 'simpler' backups and another backup tool for the most complex applications …
Chose Azure Backup
The cost, not only in the short term, but in our long-term calculations.
Even in need of improvements, the pre-sale and post-sale support is very good.
The ease, like many Microsoft products about scheduling backups, the friendly interface, the fact that there is no need for an …
Chose Azure Backup
Azure Backup is based on the most secure and encrypted cloud storage facility available...Microsoft. They have been doing this a long time and have ironed out all the kinks, leaving only the good and dependable solution in place. Azure Backup is fast also, you do not have major …
Chose Azure Backup
When it comes to protecting VM's in Azure, Azure Backup is the way to go versus offerings from Commvault. If you only have the infrastructure in Azure, Azure Backup is the much more attractive solution because it's built into the product, offers ease of configuration, and ties …
Chose Azure Backup
Main advantage is the integrated nature of Azure Backup, it's integrated in the Azure UI for VM's so it's quick to enable/access.

Cove and Shadowprotect don't support Bare Metal Restore for Azure VM's
Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Chose Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Veeam Backup & Replication
Chose Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
We selected it simply because it is less expensive than the competition, but yet just as good. We saw no reason to go outside the walls of Microsoft for this task. We are satisfied with the product.
Chose Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
I think they're very good tools, but Data Protector has lots of client options, while with Microsoft Data Protection Manager the focus is windows. But, Microsoft Data Protection Manager is much better in a virtual machine (Hyper-V world) and windows servers. If this is your …
Features
Azure BackupMicrosoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
8.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
-
Ratings
Versioning9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
File search7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
8.7
Ratings
0% above category average
Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
-
Ratings
User and role management9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
File organization9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
-
Ratings
Performance9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Reliability9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Reports8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
-
Ratings
Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Universal recovery00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Snapshots00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure BackupMicrosoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Small Businesses
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 5.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure BackupMicrosoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure BackupMicrosoft System Center Data Protection Manager (DPM)
Likelihood to Recommend
By using Azure Backup, you can back up your NAS device you use locally as a file server, virtual machines you use in [a] production environment, critical databases, and everything you can think of. I do not know if there are scenarios that are not suitable, it meets all my needs.
Read full review
Well suited for domain disaster recovery. I would avoid considering it for remote or non-domain disaster recovery. While it claims to have the ability, and we have used it this way for years, it often loses it's connection to the DPM server for no apparent reason, and has to be reconfigured. It doesn't always seem to work
Read full review
Pros
  • Azure Backup is fast! Coupled with the fact that Microsoft created Azure and Windows - these two operate phenomenally together!
  • Administering the backups inside of Azure is a breeze. The ability to mount, restore entire backups, or recover files, has been made very easy. You do not have to download any media to recover something, you do this all in the cloud and it gets mounted in Microsoft's systems. Making this process less than a quarter of the time you would have spent with your 'other' backup solutions.
Read full review
  • Clustered Hyper-V VM backup and restore.
  • Easy to have multiple restore points.
  • Can back up different workloads with the same solution.
Read full review
Cons
  • backup schedule calendar would be cool
  • Backup vaults should ask if you want to send notifications when you first set it up, there have been a couple of times when I noticed a month later that, backup job failures were not configured to send email notifications.
Read full review
  • Remote and non-domain backups could be simplified.
Read full review
Usability
Azure backup is easy to implement, accessible by using the web portal GUI, and has the ability to restore at the file level or the complete VM. We have experienced zero issues with the backup process or performing file-level restorations. We have not restored an entire VM to date.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
One of the differentials of the solution is the high level of guarantee and support of the Azure Backup solution. Microsoft is a reference in a technology company with a highly trained support team and helps us with any questions or technical problems with the tool. Service is fast and efficient with trained engineers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The cost, not only in the short term, but in our long-term calculations.
Even in need of improvements, the pre-sale and post-sale support is very good.
The ease, like many Microsoft products about scheduling backups, the friendly interface, the fact that there is no need for an expensive resource dedicated to this backup and some other details, made us choose Azure Backup.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It allowed us to have our VMs protected very quickly and with simple implementation.
  • It saved us from taking backups from Azure workloads from the on-prem environment, or even deploying a Backup environment on the cloud.
  • It has a low/'controlled' cost as you "pay-as-you-go."
Read full review
  • Reduced recovery time
  • Fast backup
  • Complete interface
Read full review
ScreenShots