Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM) vs. Jupyter Notebook

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Available on Microsoft's Azure platform, Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVMs) are comprehensive pre-configured virtual machines for data science modelling, development and deployment.N/A
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
Pricing
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Jupyter Notebook
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Jupyter Notebook
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Jupyter Notebook
Considered Both Products
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
Chose Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
Azure DSVM provides [many] cost-effective solutions rather than using the Amazon SageMaker. Amazon products are a little more detailed products but this detailing is [a] little costly in comparison to the Azure. Azure DSVM is way more controlled than the Amazon SageMaker and it …
Chose Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
It's within the Azure environment and it's easy to manage.
Jupyter Notebook
Chose Jupyter Notebook
As a beginner I tried all of them but finally due to simple and user friendly interface I opted it. I also tried visual basic which is also good platform with versatility, however for basic need it is the best.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is very easy to understand and easy to use. And can also be used by a student, freelancer, small industries, big industries. Jupyter also provides you a tool to work with machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Negligible or no cost, Highly efficient, effective, scalable , hasslefree
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is very attractive platform for new developers to code and to learn programming and perform tasks as compared to other IDE. It has very well and easy visualization, interactive programming and sharing the live code and slideshow is very easy as compare to …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is still the most well known and widely used platform I've seen. Using it over other competition like Zeppelin simply because of its availability, and my familiarity with its functionality.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Well, so far Jupyter Notebook has been the better tool for me. It gives us more freedom & has more ability to train ML models & do the data visualization more efficiently. It's easier to operate & has a very simple-to-understand UI & with the support for taking data from …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I have used PyCharm as well as Jupyter Notebook and for me, Jupyter wins almost every time. I really like its user-friend interface for someone who is new to python programming. The ability to run a big chunk of code part by part is a big game-changer for me. One thing I would …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
It should have cleaner support for multi-environment setup and should also increase the amount of features. Moreover, more support should be present for other programming languages. It should also have the option to set a specific location that opens up whenever I run command …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is easier to handle and user friendly.

We have free access to it and its cell by cell executing feature is amazing.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook has a nicer interface than RStudio in our opinion and since most of our group is familiar with Jupyter Notebook it has made it a default choice. Overall the interactive programming as well as the easy visualizations, model deployment, and markdown made Jupyter …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is the core feature extended on by many commercial alternatives. The commercial alternatives have more feature integration with the rest of their portfolio. RStudio is another competitor for interactive and literate programming.

Chose Jupyter Notebook
haven't actually explored as I decided to use it on a friend 's recommendation.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
An interesting thing is that Jupyter Notebook is run on browser environments which may or may not be a positive feature according to cases. VS Code on [the] other hand doesn't use any interface and can run Jupyter Notebooks too. Sometimes my browser consumes too much RAM due to …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I like Jupyter Notebook over the other two because it keeps my work more organized. It helps me to structure my workflow and the ability to run commands in chunks keeps me from being confused when coming back to the work after some time.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I selected Jupyter Notebook because this is better integrated with the existing production systems than optional tools (for example, R). It is also commonly used tool within the scientist community.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
When I tried Zeppelin in 2017, it was still in initial versions, Jupyter was way ahead as of then. Zeppelin had limitations and I wasn't confident of it making progress as much as Jupyter.
Features
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Jupyter Notebook
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources7.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
MDM Integration9.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Jupyter Notebook
7.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Visualization7.80 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Transformations9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Encryption9.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Built-in Processors8.40 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.4
Ratings
0% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.3
Ratings
10% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools8.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning9.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development7.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
7.7
Ratings
10% below category average
Jupyter Notebook
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options8.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Jupyter Notebook
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM Watson Studio
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Jupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Jupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
To leverage a high processing workload that can be done fast instead of in multiple days or hours.
Read full review
I would rate it 9/10 while recommending Jupyter Notebook as it offers me a wide range of functionality to operate. It is very well suited for someone who is new to python programming as the user interface helps you build code line by line. I personally have written multiple programs in Python using Jupyter Notebook as it helps me organize long code by breaking it in a structure. Also the ability to write comments using '#' helps a lot to a reader understand the code.
Read full review
Pros
  • Leveraging data.
  • Computer vision.
  • Data science.
Read full review
  • Coding and error correction line by line
  • Simple and Effectiveness
  • Easy to use for visualisation and presentation of code
  • Could be used at any place any time without hassle
Read full review
Cons
  • Azure DSVM pricing must be reduced so that an AI-based start-up can use the Azure DSVM.
  • Azure must create an environment to use Azure DSVM offline as well.
  • Lack of frameworks
Read full review
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Azure DSVM provides [many] cost-effective solutions rather than using the Amazon SageMaker. Amazon products are a little more detailed products but this detailing is [a] little costly in comparison to the Azure. Azure DSVM is way more controlled than the Amazon SageMaker and it is very cost-effective as compared to Amazon SageMaker. We are already managing Aure services so we explored the Azure DSVM which turned out [to] be a good choice.
Read full review
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot of needs I have for EDA, modeling, and data export that makes other software products fairly redundant.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Azure DSVM is little costly with long term support for ML based environments.
  • Azure DSVM is very good for short tasking and costs us [a] little low than the on-prem server.
  • [Scaling] option is very convenient.
Read full review
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
ScreenShots