TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Load Testing vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Load Testing

    N/AN/AAzure Load Testing is a fully managed load-testing service built for Azure that makes it easier to generate high-scale load and identify app performance bottlenecks. The service enables developers and testers to generate high-scale load and run simulations that reveal actionable insights into app performance, scalability, and capacity with a fully managed load-testing service. Create tests quickly without prior knowledge of load testing tools, or upload existing Apache JMeter scripts. Users can…

    $10

    per month

    Tricentis NeoLoad

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ATricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.

    $20,000

    per year with 300 virtual users

    Pricing
    Azure Load TestingTricentis NeoLoad
    Editions & Modules
    Virtual User Hour (VUH) additional usage - 9,950+ Virtual User Hours
    $0.075
    additional VUH
    Virtual User Hour (VUH) additional usage - 0 - 9,950 Virtual User Hours
    $0.15
    per additional VUH
    Load Testing Resource
    $10
    per month includes 50 Virtual User Hours (VUH) per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Load TestingTricentis NeoLoad
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Load TestingTricentis NeoLoad
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    Because of noted as below points we leaning towards Tricentis NeoLoad over other tools: Easy to use, faster test design, script customization, real time test monitoring, IP spoofing, mobile testing, scalability, easy to setup and maintain, record and playback capability, …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Azure Load TestingTricentis NeoLoad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (24 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.6
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)