Azure OpenAI Service vs. InterSystems IRIS

If you're looking for a managed OpenAI API service, then Azure OpenAI Service is a good choice.

It's fully compatible with OpenAI API, has lots of models to choose from, lots of parameters to configure to suite your needs.

The documents are well maintained, with examples to get started.

You can also setup firewall to restrict access to the API to certain IP addresses, like those of your VPCs.

Incentivized

It is best suited in the scenario where a single interface is required for providing [a complete end-to-end] solution to the customers. You don't need [a] separate platform to write code or [perform] database operations. All you need is InterSystems IRIS software and you are done. You can also use analytics functionality which is one of the greatest [features] which many customers need for their solution[.]

• Provides additional guard rails by leveraging MS Azure
• Ability to spin up different models quickly and efficiently

Incentivized

• Connecting with mutliple vendor platforms and systems allowing us to consume and provide data as needed.
• Allowed us to implement our own RESTful api engine to server data to our internal applications.
• Setting up their recommendations for high availability allow us to perform server maintenance with minimal down time to our users.

• More examples would be helpful, especially when it come to token counting & summarizing
• Pricing is not really straightforward to estimate as it's based on token count
• Complete privacy requires special agreement with Microsoft

Incentivized

• Enhanced documentation, more comprehensive and user-friendly documentation, including detailed tutorials and examples
• Improving compatibility and integrations with others programming languages
• Introducing tools and techniques to optimize the performance of ObjectScript applications, such as profiling tools, performance monitoring utilities, and code optimization guidelines
• A better compatibility with Python libraries

Azure OpenAI is easy to deploy, manage and scalable solution for Gen AI application, they have really good SDK to call their APIs securely. anyone with a background in backend engineering can easily use their APIs to make their ideas into reality

Incentivized

The interface is very intuitive, the documentation is very good so it is not complicated to operate.

The security is complex, but you can create a special role to access and the user ONLY can operate with the part that it allows.

Also, you can examine the data very quick with the SQL Browser integrated.

The InterSystems WRC has always been helpful and responsive. The folks I have spoken with are always understanding of our needs and questions and regardless of if the question is simple or complex we are always met with the same professionalism and helpfulness every time. I have no hesitations contacting InterSystems for help!

Will done based on a proper planning, so this will makes execution more easier and better.

1. Open AI is best at giving accurate answers. 2. It is secure and more trustworthy 3. Most of our client using Azure cloud so it becomes go to choice for them. 4. Scalable as it handles 1000s of request per minute. 5. SDKs are easy to use and well documented.

Incentivized

Tibco was not originally planned to be used for HL7 Integrations and as such we had to create some very complicated processes in order for the messages to parse and validate appropriately. It was simply not built for this type of interoperability. Comparatively, InterSystems IRIS for Health (HealthConnect) has out of the box HL7 features that would parse messages, offer a variety of validation options, simplified data lookups and transformation and reduced the amount of time it took to develop connections with out vendor systems. InterSystems IRIS also allows one to push just single files into production at a time so there is less of a chance of us pushing something that should not be in production yet as our previous system was set up to with TIBCO deployments

Incentivized

• Honestly, I just started using it a few months ago, and I haven't seen any major benefits.
• It has almost similar capabilities as free version of ChatGPT, so it's worth paying for chat models unless we need to use API.
• ROI has not been impacted at all, as I mostly use free version over this to avoid higher charges.

Incentivized

• Very Fast and scalable software to deal with big data flow, safe and robust.
• The studio IDE is quite old fashion and lacks a few facilities
• amazing for complex data consumption, its milyi-model capability wich allows multiple different models for a single set of codes.