Barracuda RMM vs. Syncro

It is very good for Managed Service Providers to be able to monitor and manage multiple clients at a time from one central location. Many things can be automated through it so that they don't require your constant attention. It would not be as appropriate for internal use at a company, is more suited for MSP's.

Incentivized

The good is pretty good when it comes to Syncro. Window patching works well. They add features often. No hidden fees and good pricing. The bad, are inconvenient when it comes to Syncro but could be worse. Reporting does not look good. Support only through email. There are no forums or network scanning/SNMP

Incentivized

• Agentless, unlike most RMM, you don't need to download and install an agent on the devices. The onsite manager (OM) will scan the entire domain for computers, network devices, printers, etc.
• Remote access: Users have to select whether to access shared screen or via RDP.
• Detail Dashboard Information: it has a very reach feature that displays information about system components.

Incentivized

• Decent UI
• Things generally work
• Not too expensive

Incentivized

• It can be hard to use at first glance
• Does not work well on weak and old laptops
• Otherwise everything is perfect

Incentivized

• Ticketing. Whilst the ticketing system works, it is fairly basic compared to specific ticketing solutions. Some improvements here would be great.
• Remote Management - granular options on accounts. You are unable to have some clients or systems which do not require a password for remote access, whilst having this set for other clients/accounts. This makes it a problem if you want to use the remote management component on servers where there is no one available to approve access
• Better "built in" remote access software. Whilst the base remote access software works and that the system integrates with larger remote management vendors, some improvements to the remote management component would be beneficial

Incentivized

The overall value of Syncro is good due to cost of software and the things that it does do well. However, there are some limitations that will be frustrating and may require extra software or time to complete or format in other platforms. So, can cause some setbacks to some organizations but be work well for others, based on their needs

Incentivized

We've tried many times to work with support to accomplish various tasks in the system with minimal responsiveness and success. Most of what we have accomplished has been without support and through trial/error.

Incentivized

• Barracuda Managed Workplace definitely handles live notifications better then Lansweeper.
• We currently use Lansweeper for Software Deployment and Patch Management
• Nagios has better visuals for network layout and heartbeat monitoring
• We are assessing TeamViewer/AnyDesk now for better Remote Desktop support. But Barracuda does handle this task very well and we wouldn't be put out to continue using Barracuda for this.

Incentivized

Syncro does not have every bell or whistle (especially when compared with Kaseya VSA). However from a cost versus feature perspective, Syncro wins hands down. Syncro versus Atera - they are very similar products and also use the per agent pricing. This was a big driver for us and Syncro came out at cheaper priced option. Atera does have more features and is a more mature product - however the features that we required were perfect in SyncroMSP

Incentivized

• It has really helped us in reporting. We need to show our customers that our monitoring is helping them and the reports are very helpful in doing that.

Incentivized

• Saved us hundreds of dollars switching from previous provider

Incentivized