BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	Cylance, a Blackberry company since the early 2019 acquisition, developed their flagship business antivirus and endpoint protection software in CylancePROTECT, featured in business and home editions boasting artificial intelligence guided protection. BlackBerry Protect is a post-acquisition evolution of CylanceProtect.	N/A
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Score 7.7 out of 10	N/A	The Trend Vision One Endpoint Security platform provides antivirus and malware detection, and endpoint visibility. The product suite can be extended with associated applications that cover mobile endpoint protection, endpoint encryption, as well as network and server vulnerability protection.	$26.99 12 month subscription

Pricing

BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Trend Micro Vision One Endpoint Security Core - subscription license renewal - 1 device: $26.99
12 month subscription
Trend Micro Vision One - License - 51-250 Users - New Subscription: $35.99
12 month subscription
Trend Micro Vision One Endpoint Security Pro - subscription license - 1 device: $178.99
12 month subscription

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Considered Both Products	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Verified User Anonymous Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) At the time we were looking to upgrade to the Blackberry version, we already had the Dell branded version of Cylance installed on our machines and we really liked it. Once we got the pricing comparison between Carbon Black and Blackberry we made the decision to stick with … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) not as good but not willing to pay the price of the outage that happened earlier Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Cost was much better than McAfee. PROTECT can cover non-virtual endpoints. Incentivized Helpful? Rod Payton Director Of Information Technology Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Better product. it works better, is easier to manage, costs less, and is easier to remove if you want to change. Incentivized Helpful? BE Brandon Engel Senior System Analyst Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) We were on Sophos Anti-Virus and moved to CylancePROTECT. It was a no competition as Sophos was a very resource-intensive product that would slow our systems down when it scanned. CylancePROTECT gave us the ability to look at how the files reacted which allows for a faster … Incentivized Helpful? JP Jerome Pierce Helpdesk Manager Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Cylance processes are more silent to the end-users and cost. Incentivized Helpful? Shaun van Niekerk, CISSP Head of ICT Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) I have compared CylancePROTECT against several other traditional AV's in a lab environment with some serious new malware and ransomware. Cylance was my clear choice and remain proud of that decision, after 2.5 years. I managed to get 4 out of 4 ransomware infections past in my … Incentivized Helpful? ER Eric Rise Network System Administrator Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Once you see a road show with Cylance and watch how Cylance is able to block ten out of ten or nine out of ten threats live vs SEP which stops six or seven out of ten, you're sold. Cylance has crushed all the competition in these events. Disconnect the competition from any … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) CylancePROTECT blocked all known threats (including zero-day ransomware executables) immediately. ESET detected the "out in the wild" known malicious executables, but the moment we modified those executables or loaded freshly created ransomware files, ESET failed spectacularly … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Since there are no signatures, it learns your environment and the software running on it. Its better to manage/set up than the Symantec EndPoint Protection we had before. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Cylance, I believe is the only one that uses the predict and prevent execution of advanced threats and malware at the endpoint. Cylance is by far a superior product. Incentivized Helpful? Daniel Halter Group IT Manager Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Cylance had a lower CPU consumption than it's competitors allowing us to improve client performance especially on older hardware and without the need to schedule background scans it has ensured staff can work optimally. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Beet them hands down! Both were ineffective at stopping the more recent and sophisticated types of malware. Incentivized Helpful? Andrew Vawdrey IT Helpdesk Technician Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Cylance was steps ahead of these other competitors with the technology they use. Yes, it was a bit more pricey than the others but we found it to be worth the extra cost because we wanted to make sure we would be the most protected we could be. Some of the others were not easy … Incentivized Helpful? Joe Bayramyan Senior Systems Engineer Chose BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Cylance had a better detection and catch efficiency Incentivized Helpful?	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Honestly they are fairly similar in the nature. The biggest benefit to us as an organization was the cost and prior knowledge of the product. Both products offer a great solution so it just comes down to personal preference and cost. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Another organization was using this software and Trend micro is widely used now a days and remote support is a positive thing. Also policy and updates are always on time delivered by the vendor. Online many software were compared by SME. Incentivized Helpful? ST Starling Trinidad IT Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security For me, Trend Micro Apex One with its low performance is the best option at the time to buy a solution like this, with its flexibility through on-premises or saas deployment options you can choose the option that best fix to you, has an advanced automated threat detection and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security None. Incentivized Helpful? BY Brady Yeoman Regional IT Manager Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro is a company headquartered in the USA and provides a high-quality product with minimal impact of resources on the computers. Leaving both IT and endpoint users happy. Incentivized Helpful? SJ Shannon Johnson System Engineer Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro Apex One (formerly OfficeScan), to me, is head and shoulders above both of those products. You could take the best parts of both products combined and Trend Micro Apex One (formerly OfficeScan) is still so much more reliable, easier to manage, and trustworthy than … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security When comparing trend micro apex one to symantec endpoint protection there is a definite and stark difference. Symantec cannot find or stop viruses but it has an easy to use agent upgrade management system. On the other hand Trend micro seems to find and stop numerous viruses … Incentivized Helpful? Nathan Roberts Director, Management Information Systems Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I have evaluated several endpoint security products over the years, but Trend Micro consistently lands in the Gartner's magic quadrant of best companies in this space, reviews well, and, most tellingly, I have had great success with their products. Every iteration brings … Incentivized Helpful? David Schwartz IT Director Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Apex One beats on non-Trend Micro product by leaps and bounds, not just on price but overall functionality. When comparing it to the other Trend Micro products, it really comes down to what features you're looking for and what sort of devices you need to have covered. Either … Incentivized Helpful? LL Lee Ludlum IT Technical Support Specialist Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro Deep Security Smart Check Incentivized Helpful? Jorge Flores VIP Support Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security We have chosen Trend Micro due to the availability to migrate our physical server to the cloud. It has reduced the maintenance cost of the data center and offers the same, if not more, protection then we used to have. Also, the provider that sold us Trend Micro offers more … Incentivized Helpful? Breanna Walsemann Marketing and Advertising Consultant Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I believe Trend Micro is a much better solution than Norton. Norton allows more spam to come through whereas Trend Micro does a better job of preventing such things. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend micro has been superior compared to McAfee endpoint antivirus. It is very intuitive on what to block and what to allow. Incentivized Helpful? Tom Parker Remote Facilities Systems Support Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security The cost is lower and less resources to run Trend. Incentivized Helpful? Nathan Venno IT Manager Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I would never deploy Trend Micro on any scale to anyone ever. I work in an SMB, don't have much exposure or Internet traffic (other than the usual stuff). I just need something that will adequately protect my users without being intrusive or burdensome to run and operate. I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security McAfee can be confusing and I do not like the licensing model. AVG is good for home use but not the best for business. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I chose Trend Micro instead of Kaspersky Work space Security because of the price. However, Kaspersky is in a much better place in the AntiVirus comparatives like: https://www.av-comparatives.org Incentivized Helpful? Ratulsnigdha Saha Network/Systems Engineer Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security The installation is very straight forward from infrastructure perspective and it's easy to maintain the product. It's easy for users to use the agent and run frequent scans on the machine as needed. It does have some very high end features if time is used to explore them, it … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I really liked the offerings from GFI Vipre in terms of feature set and simplicity, as well as the cloud management for all clients. Another plus was the patch management feature that applied to "3rd-party" applications. I ended up staying with Trend Micro OfficeScan because … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Mostly it was an ease of deployment. At the time it had the best deployment package. Incentivized Helpful? Joe Barnett Director of Technology and Information Services Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro stacks up very well from a technology standpoint. Pricing is higher than other competitors. Incentivized Helpful? Aaron Myers Senior Business Systems Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Both Kaspersky and Symantec were less than ideal solutions that caused more problems than they fixed. They were very difficult to manage and, while fully featured, caused compatibility issues and CPU spikes that are non-existent with Trend. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) 9.2 Ratings 7% above category average	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security 8.1 Ratings 6% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	9.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.90 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Centralized Management	9.70 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	10.00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	9.90 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	8.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Malware Detection	8.00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend	9.7 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	9.3 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Availability	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	5.0 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Configurability	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend	If I had to recommend an endpoint AV solution, [BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)] would be on the list...in fact at the top of the current list. It is a cost effective solution. When we did the bakeoff in our selection we built 3 generic W10 PCs. We located a Malware repository on the internet and downloaded a package of 100. The first solution stopped 80% from installing, the second stopped 100%, [BlackBerry (CylancePROTECT)] would not let the package download! Winner winner chicken dinner :) Incentivized Rod Payton Director Of Information Technology Read full review	I think Trend is well suited for businesses that need an all-in-one malware/antivirus/EDR solution. It works well and runs smoothly in the background not hindering the users. Our only issue with it is the use of it and secure browsers for state testing. The EDR wants to automatically blocked the use of secure browsers setup by the state. Incentivized JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Read full review
Pros	Cylance uses AI Math-Model algorithms/machine-learning solutions, compared to other solutions which use signature-based solutions. The Cylance client is very light-weight and is not as resource hungry. The blocking capability is completely customizable through policies. Macro blocking, script blocking, and device blocking (USB, CDROM, iPhone, Android, etc.) can all be customized per organization needs. Management interface is easy to use. The dashboard gives administrators a quick glance at threat events, threat protection, and device protection. Reports give you quick glances at infections, stale versions, and computers that have been offline for a period of time. Updates are easy to roll out in a tiered fashion to properly test. Customer support is great! You can open up a ticket within the management portal and get help within a few hours. Most of the support is over email unless it is complicated, then they will do a remote session. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	End point implementation: the roll-out of Trend Micro was extremely easy! Server/Device policies: creating both endpoint and server device policies is something we were looking for in a system, since we have a variety of both endpoints with users, as well as several unattended servers needing specific limitations. License Management: removing Trend Micro from machines before destruction or retirement is done in a pinch. There's no struggling to free up an unused license Incentivized David Schwartz IT Director Read full review
Cons	It would be great if there was a way for an administrator to make a file as safe from the end user device when a false positive has occurred (which is rare). At present and administrator has to log into the web console, create an exception and then wait 60-120 seconds for this to be effective on the end user device, still great, but this can be frustrating for users that are urgently trying to use the file. Executive reporting could be better. Just a single page dashboard report that could be included in other monthly reporting. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Only thing I would have to say that's negative is the reporting aspect. Basic reporting is good but still lacks some details. This is a problem with many of the software vendors I have encountered in the past as well. Reporting is still much better than most. Incentivized SJ Shannon Johnson System Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	It's simply been the best product I've used and tested within the past four years. Incentivized ER Eric Rise Network System Administrator Read full review	It is very easy to stick with a vendor year after year, and it is also easy to see the faults in a product and want to change. This is the first time I have renewed with an antiviurs provider as others have been less than ideal and caused issues where there were none before, so while it isn't perfect, it is the best of the bunch currently and I am hopeful that it will continue to improve in future versions. Incentivized Aaron Myers Senior Business Systems Analyst Read full review
Usability	Great product Great technology Great people Great leader (Stuart McClure) Great Service I work with hundreds of complex suppliers in healthcare and tech, and this company is more than just an extension of our business. Shaun van Niekerk, CISSP Head of ICT Read full review	The dashboard is user-friendly and allows for an IT admin to quickly deploy the software. The users do not even notice the program running in the background. From the dashboard the IT department can monitor all the workstations for issues and maintain good health of the network. Incentivized JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Read full review
Support Rating	I have only used CylancePROTECT support one time and they were very fast and responsive with the answers that solved my issue. That is the only reason I gave them a 7 as I have only had one interaction with them. Incentivized BE Brandon Engel Senior System Analyst Read full review	It has been difficult at sometimes, the support people at one point told me that they couldn't tell me information about OfficeScan because it was knowledge that was passed down from engineer to engineer. The issue was that if you used the msi for the install any further installs would require the msi to have the same exact name or else the install fails and corrupts the install. This information is not listed anywhere on trends website. Support kept trying to get me to use the exe for installs instead, but we use SCCM and msi's work better. We had to write a script to come up with a solution so that we could uninstall the software and install the new software. Trend did provide the technical expertise to help with the script and had us work with one of the developers in order to resolve that issue. So they did fix their screw up but it took a while and several complaints. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	At the time we were looking to upgrade to the Blackberry version, we already had the Dell branded version of Cylance installed on our machines and we really liked it. Once we got the pricing comparison between Carbon Black and Blackberry we made the decision to stick with Cylance since we knew it was proven to work well in our environment with some of our unique software. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	When comparing trend micro apex one to Symantec Endpoint Protection there is a definite and stark difference. Symantec cannot find or stop viruses but it has an easy to use agent upgrade management system. On the other hand Trend micro seems to find and stop numerous viruses including things that are not viruses. And the upgrading used to be an issue but it is supposed to be better now, in apex one Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	We are spending less time troubleshooting potential attacks - all alerts go to our management interface and we can globally clear/block items. Users are not getting upset at the resources taken by antivirus - they feel they got their speedy machine back. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Since the product is a full suite of protection rolled into a single product, we've seen ROI through cost reduction and simplified management. And while we haven't measured performance, one would logically assume that systems will perform better with a single product installed vs several. While we haven't measured performance, one would logically assume that systems will perform better with a single product installed vs several. Incentivized Nathan Roberts Director, Management Information Systems Read full review
ScreenShots		Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Screenshots