BMC Helix ITSM vs. Microsoft System Center

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BMC Helix ITSM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
BMC Helix ITSM replaces Remedy. It is a broad suite of ITSM, tools with strong integrations to other BMC tools and in-built ITAM. The product is used mainly by global brands and is offered in on-premise and SaaS configurations.N/A
Microsoft System Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center Suite is a family of IT management software for network monitoring, updating and patching, endpoint protection with anti-malware, data protection and backup, ITIL- structured IT service management, remote administration and more. It is available in two editions: standard and datacenter. Datacenter provides unlimited virtualization for high density private clouds, while standard is for lightly or non-virtualized private cloud workloads.
$1,323
Pricing
BMC Helix ITSMMicrosoft System Center
Editions & Modules
BMC Helix ITSM
Contact Sales
Standard Edition
$1323
Datacenter Edition
$3607
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BMC Helix ITSMMicrosoft System Center
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BMC Helix ITSMMicrosoft System Center
Considered Both Products
BMC Helix ITSM
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
SapphireIMS, BMC IT Business Management Suite (Discontinued) and ServiceNow Customer Service Management
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
Jira Service Management is a new tool with a lot of potential (highly rated by Gartner) but for now it lacks the experience, robustness and integrations with BMC Helix. And thinking about Service Operations, the discovery tool still needs to be improved. It is a promising tool, …
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
flexibility in development and customization. however now in saas we lost lot of that. anyway its all about fantasy. the idea of the solution from dough is still there even when innovation studio is trying to overtake. i hope bmc will stop with bad decisions
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
I have used ServiceNow and to me, it's not able to handle extremely large organizations and entities that software. And that was of course three or four years ago. So perhaps they've grown, but that's my opinion, my first impression based on some companies moving to it. That's …
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
In my opinion, Servicenow is overly expensive and pulling the curtain back exposes a deep abyss of insufficiency compared to the true capabilities of BMC Helix ITSM. I think Servicenow is shiny out of the box, but you find it is inferior after a deeper dive
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
BMC CMDB and some key capabilities are much more easy to use and again the seamless workings between BMC products adds more value eliminating the need for integration.
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
Prior to our partnership with BMC, we used home grown tools to support the ITSM functions. Our tools were outdated, inefficient, and ineffective which is why we switched to BMC.
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
WE are migrating from Cherweel, which is an Ivanti product. Their new version was showcased to us and was not much of an improvement from Cherwell
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
Discovery feeds IT assets by facilitating the opening of tickets - Discovery alimenta os ativos de TI facilitando a abertura dos chamados
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
BMC Helix ITSM is much more robust and configurable for the enterprise
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
By far the most powerful product, BMC Helix ITSM also has a steep learning curve,
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
We moved from Service Now to BMC Helix ITSM for improved collaboration, improved automanion, and cost reduction.
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued), ServiceNow IT Asset Management and Jira Service Management
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
Jira Service Management and ServiceNow IT Service Management
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
BMC Helix ITSM offers an onpremise option, which is not provided by many of the big ITSM solutions. BMC offer an integrated plattform solution, which does not need any addons or custom connectors to integrate every solution, like inventory, event management, Configration …
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
The ITSM is the most complete I know and it should work great with AIOPs
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
O product cost e and evolution
Chose BMC Helix ITSM
BMC Helix ITSM is the only system I used that has all the features my organization needs.
Microsoft System Center
Chose Microsoft System Center
None. We are a Microsoft business, and this is THE tool for imaging, packaging, remote support, and antivirus management. Microsoft's tool is the best for managing its software, systems, and antivirus clients. I will say that Microsoft Intune, the cloud platform, can be used …
Chose Microsoft System Center
The versatility of the suite of application provided by the Microsoft experience center was way above the other competitors , it helped gained leverage over the other products in the market . That why we made the decision of choosing Microsoft system center as a infrastructure …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We use Azure, we have lisences, so we have no needs any other cost.
And also, we want to save backup data in Azure.
Veritas ask additional cost reagurally and have to rebuild bakcup environment.
Chose Microsoft System Center
Because Datadog was too small, we decided quickly to use Microsoft System Center. We use a lot of other Microsoft products so that discussion was quickly set internally.
Chose Microsoft System Center
We have used Ghost from Symantec (licensed), FOG and Clonezilla which are freeware products. All three products had their pros and cons. The two freeware products were functional but did lack some polish, and Ghost was a good product for imaging of desktop computers. All did …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We are using Microsoft products for a long time, so the overall confidence played a part in the decision, the feature set and licensing cost was also very high when compared with above products, so we decided to use System Center for our environment, so far it has solved many …
Chose Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center has more options. Microsoft System Center has the ability to image PCs as well as remotely connect to PCs, and software installation and patching where Symantec Ghost Solution Suite didn't handle all of these options as well. We haven't looked at many …
Chose Microsoft System Center
Much better UI for system center. Also, Tivoli was discontinued, so it was an easy decision. Altiris was acquired by Symantec but was unreliable and painful. It's UI was unresponsive and generally outdated. It wouldn't clean up old packages and would hog GB of disk space, …
Chose Microsoft System Center
I would say Microsoft System Center and Oracle were about the same. Oracle seemed to be a little more user-friendly, but for the most part, they are both comparable.
Chose Microsoft System Center
Because it rocks and it just works. With the other software, you would have to do a lot of monkey work to make it work.
Chose Microsoft System Center
I have used ZENworks, Altiris, and Landesk. They are all good products in their own right and have many strengths. The pricing, bundling SCCM with our Microsoft site license, really helps create an ROI that puts SCCM over the top. Pricing aside it is a tool designed by …
Chose Microsoft System Center
I have not chosen this software directly because I found myself in an environment that already used this product, a purely Microsoft environment. Therefore the choice that has been made has proved very effective and above all suited to our needs, and for this reason, no …
Chose Microsoft System Center
I have not had any experience with another system that you would image computers other than manually imaging them locally with an image.
Chose Microsoft System Center
Everything we have is on a Microsoft operating system, so it makes sense to use it.
Chose Microsoft System Center
It's better than others because Microsoft knows its own OS better than anyone. It has a very rich feature set and allows companies to hit many areas of need with one tool. You can have IT staff get multiple tasks done just by logging in and they don't even have to leave their …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We built our POC of the private cloud with vRealize Suite and Microsoft System Center. We are VMware shop so we thought the vrealize will be solution for us but we found pretty fast the vrealize suite is very limited and very expensive compare to Microsoft. With System Center …
Features
BMC Helix ITSMMicrosoft System Center
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
BMC Helix ITSM
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft System Center
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Expert directory8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Service restoration8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service tools8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
BMC Helix ITSM
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft System Center
-
Ratings
Configuration mangement8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset management dashboard8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
BMC Helix ITSM
8.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft System Center
-
Ratings
Change requests repository8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Change calendar8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Service-level management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BMC Helix ITSMMicrosoft System Center
Small Businesses
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BMC Helix ITSMMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BMC Helix ITSMMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
BMC is the obvious choice for medium—to large companies. With all the functionality included, most of it will be used by more prominent companies. The cost vs. use makes sense for them. For smaller companies, the high cost of license implementation and running costs usually make BMC too expensive. Having a light version for them could increase BMC's market share.
Read full review
We used a product before that was designed to prevent users making changes and saving files to the desktop computer. This required a renewal of the license. By using SCCM in our environment we were able to discontinue using that product because SCCM allows us to completely restore a machine back to the original configuration. We have taught our users to save their individual work on either a network drive or a cloud drive. By doing this, if we do a re-image of their machine they have lost no data, and it makes for a faster resolution. In some instances having a computer in our SCCM environment it can become cumbersome when creating new users for very specific purposes. It can be done by creating new organizational units and applying new policies but when in a pinch it can be frustrating. For the most part we have tried to make "new" purpose images and groups to at least accommodate a quick install.
Read full review
Pros
  • Remedy is great for housing much of the ITIL process in one System: if you want a complete package with every bell and every whistle, Remedy is for you
  • Remedy breaks down the functions of ITIL into "consoles": separate areas of the System, that allow one to focus on Changes, Incidents, Assets, etc
  • The interface is VERY compatible with legacy web browser tech: The last surviving member of the browser wars is still the favorite for remedy users: IE 11
Read full review
  • Provides our users the ability to deploy and manage our own datacenter based on defined software with understandable solutions for storage, compute, networking and security.
  • We are able to update at once all the computers from all departments without having to install the OS on every computer.
  • It allows us to have everything in one place for database management and datacenter inspection as well.
Read full review
Cons
  • Expandability is limited and once you make certain customizations the upgrade process can become difficult or impossible
  • Relationships between Configuration Items and Changes is clunky and difficult to setup/maintain
  • Service Desk functionality is not as robust as other tools and does not allow for easy configurations/customizations
Read full review
  • Needs web based storefront for requesting new software
  • Needs ability to manage the packaging work flow better
  • Sometimes is slow to download and there is no indication the entire catalog is being loaded, resulting in confused users not being able to find common software in the available list.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It provides the tool we need and is able to be customised to meet new requirements. Cost to change in training and integrations would be considerable.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
At least Remedy is all contained in a single platform, so the interface is consistent. Also, the most heavily performed functions are generally usable. However, to use some of the more advanced modules can be a bit more cumbersome (such as Change Management and CMDB (Not Including ADDM)). So, overall BMC Remedy ITSM is better than some applications like CA SDM or HP SM, but not quite on par with ServiceNow.
Read full review
No matter our issues with the software, its ability to centrally manage systems, patch, image, and remote help users has far exceeded our timeliness to help staff. Its ability to keep current, enable us to keep the network secure, and standardize our end-user experience has saved us many hours, dollars, and time every day.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
for now we are satisfied. first two months 😉
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
could be faster. db is slower from introducing postgresql
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Their tech support is top notch. They respond and get back to us, even on lower level incidents and issues, very quickly. It is rare that we deal with a support technician who does not know what they are doing.
Read full review
If I had to dislike something about the system it would be how much it changes once you upgrade. This could be more of a problem of mine since I get used to one way and don't like it when it changes so much. I am enjoying the newest update, but it is a mess when you are actually going through the upgrades.
Read full review
Online Training
the trainers dont have so much practical experiences. its mostly follow up and reading existing documentation withou own input. of course experiences people are on shore or have no free time. sad truth
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I was not a part of the initial implementation
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
As I mentioned, as an MSP we are exposed to most ITSM products on the marketplace. On completeness of offering, we find BMC ahead of the rest. The only other comparable product is ServiceNow, and functionality is neck and neck with BMC ahead in ITOM, and with ServiceNow pricing is premium for the branding and marketing
Read full review
None. We are a Microsoft business, and this is THE tool for imaging, packaging, remote support, and antivirus management. Microsoft's tool is the best for managing its software, systems, and antivirus clients. I will say that Microsoft Intune, the cloud platform, can be used for those with heavy 365 usage, but for us, that does not meet our current company needs.
Read full review
Scalability
the product is,probably, really scalable. however as it is in cloud,this theme isn't of our interest anymore
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • With the KPIs exported and reviewed semi-annually or quarterly the management can spot and attend to root causes affecting operations.
  • No more missed or forgotten tickets for work orders by the team - increased efficiency and performance.
  • Approvals hierarchy enforces controlled change management and responsible actions.
Read full review
  • We have been able to automate our patch management, firmware and other security concerns.
  • We have a standardized "image" ensuring our setup is consistent across the enterprise. This alone has saved us in time to support and time to understand how to use our desktops.
Read full review
ScreenShots

BMC Helix ITSM Screenshots

Screenshot of BMC Helix Multi-Cloud Broker. This is where users can deliver a secure service experience across multi-cloud environments.Screenshot of Knowledge Management, available with intelligent recommendations to help bring the right information to end-users and agents to quickly and accurately resolve issues.Screenshot of the incident and problem management interface, used to create and resolve incidents faster with intelligent, context-aware, and proactive incident matching.