Board vs. Varicent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Board
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Board is presented as an enterprise planning platform, offered as a solution to accelerate business performance and enable continuous planning with greater forecast accuracy to drive confident, aligned decisions.N/A
Varicent
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
From quotas to sales and compensation, Varicent helps revenue leaders in enterprise organizations chart a more effective, connected path to revenue by providing vital data, insights, and sales go-to-market planning tools.N/A
Pricing
BoardVaricent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoardVaricent
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BoardVaricent
Considered Both Products
Board
Chose Board
Business problems that Board addresses are & how Board stacks up against them :Difficulty in managing and tracking multiple projects and tasks at the same timeInefficient communication and coordination among team membersLack of visibility into team performance and …
Chose Board
Board platform giving all the services from the lastest update according to our own business requirement. Even It's pricing model is very lower than other platform. We are getting lots of digital data maintaining, reporting, publishing without any kind of highly training course.
Chose Board
We earlier used Planful, which was also a good product but not as good as Board. The backend reporting and analysis of data are top-notch. The reports generated are quick and accurate. Board also offers to learn to upskill the team so that they can use the tool effectively and …
Chose Board
The features and the haslle free UI where any first time user can understand the esay navigation and achieving their business goal. To be brief, the features are very unique and most promising compared to the other application. Providing custom & tailored solutions of business …
Chose Board
Board has been more complete when compared to Anaplan. Although I didn't participate in the buying decision of any of those products I have used both and by far Board just has more features. It's more than a CPM, it's BI and CPM put together. If I had to make a choice now it …
Chose Board
Board is much much easier to setup than compared to Azure Power BI. Power BI also has a lot of challenges around data refresh with their web interface. While talking to support, we were made aware that for full feature-set, we should use the desktop version. Clearly something …
Chose Board
Board is useful in running all under one platform which is advance analytics, creating workflows and allowing users to create customizable dashboard once and using them for longitudinal tracking of Key performance indicators. It can provide tools and applications required to …
Chose Board
Based on your budget and what your inclination is to brand/service reputation, you can always find a different platform that can do more/better for the same/less cost, based on how you seek to find the metrics you want analyzed. It also depends on how your forecasting and …
Chose Board
We selected Board over similar alternatives for its integrated business intelligence and corporate management capabilities. Furthermore, the ability to generate customized real-time reports, benchmark data, and trends were the primary reasons for implementing Board in our …
Chose Board
We felt that Board has better integration. This is purely from the POC call that we had with both the teams. I personally have not evaluated the tool.
Chose Board
We check previous reviews of the product and used a trial run of both products in a trial period. Most of our users voted for Board because of the features so our organization chose Board.
Chose Board
1) One of the main reasons we went for Board is that the consultant we hired was confident that it would be a game-changer in terms of financial analytics. He proved to be right.
2) Board has a great user community, so help is something that is always available even if their …
Chose Board
Board is a non-traditional reporting tool. It uses the latest data sciences advances to organize data. Board’s advanced In-memory Server Cluster architecture allows Board server workloads to be shared on a virtually unlimited number of nodes. This functionality ensures full …
Chose Board
Board has a number of flexible and easy tools which are not complicated to get their full performance concepts. Board interface can be customized by all users, Cloud deployment basics are also very simple to any user, and the data insights collection capability which Board …
Chose Board
The Cloud tools and the easy setting of all the Board functionalities via the Cloud deployment are amazing and easy to train on the Board features performance concepts. Board has straightforward business solutions generation capabilities and its intelligent functions are more …
Chose Board
We can not say that IBM system is not good, it is at par with Board. Selection is based on [the] best bid only. While we have used IBM also in [another] place.
Chose Board
These tools are handled for different purposed across the Product Groups however Board has an edge on the getting the best things upfront rather than becoming the jack of all trades. It has highly specific use cases for better Business Analytics and Decision making.
Chose Board
Board tools are well arranged and very accessible by the user. Board capabilities that enable effective Cloud marketing of various business or products are effective and also its data analytics is the best. Board allows reports creation and easy reports distribution among …
Chose Board
The flexibility of the Board features and the [ease] of customization make everything amazing and the ability to model new data models and also the new business is the greatest capability. Board can manage multiple contents through the Cloud and also export different reports …
Varicent
Chose Varicent
Initial comparison analysis was done but no insights into the outcome and why Varicent was chosen over Xactly
Chose Varicent
Previous companies used ERP solutions. Now, here for commission calculation, we selected Varicent.
Chose Varicent
Varicent is the leader in the ICM space because it is scalable and is always making improvements / enhancements based on customer input. However in my opinion based on my own experience, all ICM providers operate similarly in that they over-promise to get a customer's business …
Chose Varicent
Varicent was selected 1) because we had an incompetent independent contractor managing the process; 2) Varicent misrepresented both scale & cost as well as support.
Chose Varicent
Budget-wise, reporting, and System availability-wise. Varicent hands down provides a better environment for compensation deliverables and management reporting which includes all of the financial needs we require. The following components were able to determine our pick. …
Chose Varicent
Varicent is the only tool I have experience with.
Chose Varicent
I used Appx and Optymyze in my previous organization and I found out of all the tools I have used Appx was the best, then Optymyze and then Varicent.
Chose Varicent
Varicent is an all-in-one platform that provides database access, UI, and ability to create calculations, reports, etc. from data. I like this better than traditional databases as it takes what would've been additional coding and makes it an easy process to go through with just …
Chose Varicent
Varicent was the best combination of cost, features, and scalable
Chose Varicent
I just use varicent as for this tipe of application
Chose Varicent
Varicent outperforms other Incentive Compensation Management I have used in the past. Its user interface is far more user friendly, data is more accurate and up to date. The whole look and feel is modern and polished.
Chose Varicent
I was not part of the team at that time.
Chose Varicent
We have both PeopleSoft and Varicent. The tools are used for similar process (compensation review ) but on different entities with different (not compatible) requirements.
Chose Varicent
The base of the logic was advanced and already created
Chose Varicent
In 2015, we used a scorecard containing 80 attributes in our review of Oracle, Callidus, and Xactly & Varicent. Oracle did not have true self serve capabilities- programming was heavily required, not intuitive, out of the box functionality was limited. Callidus & Xactly could …
Chose Varicent
All good products. When we initially chose Varicent it was the most flexible tool and price was competitive
Chose Varicent
We haven't used incentive compensation schemes previously, but using Varicent has removed errors and made the compensation process more efficient.

Chose Varicent
Varicent was pre-selected before I joined the organization.
Features
BoardVaricent
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Board
6.8
Ratings
12% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Board
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.1
Ratings
15% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Publish to Web6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.3
Ratings
4% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.5
Ratings
15% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Board
6.9
Ratings
12% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.5
Ratings
10% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.2
Ratings
12% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.4
Ratings
12% below category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Flat file integration7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales ICM
Comparison of Sales ICM features of Product A and Product B
Board
-
Ratings
Varicent
6.7
Ratings
10% below category average
Sales compensation plan creation00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Complex sales crediting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Sales compensation process automation00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Incentive auditing/regulation compliance00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Sales compensation dashboards & forecasting00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Incentive modeling00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Agile incentive strategy00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
ICM mobile visibility00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoardVaricent
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoardVaricent
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
4.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
5.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
5.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.2
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
5.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
4.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
5.9
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
5.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoardVaricent
Likelihood to Recommend
It's been very good when all departments of the company had to pitch in data/information for a specific business decision. My company had to have input from Marketing, Sales, Engineering, Customer Support, and accounting in order to decide on what kind of development was next needed for our platform.
Read full review
For the use cases we have at the bank, ICM is a perfect solution. For any bank or institution that has similar requirements, ICM would be a perfect solution. But I also think for any use case that has any sort of incentives based on Sales done, this would work amazing, as both Calculations and reports are handled by ICM very well; it's an all-in-one solution, I feel like.
Read full review
Pros
  • Board makes data summary easy - It makes comprehensive reports with great visuals.
  • Board makes navigation is easy for users - it has abundant training materials to help you get started.
  • With Board security is easy to set up and maintain for the organization - the support staff also provides great assistance for implementation and resolves other issues.
Read full review
  • Flexibility - Varicent is not template based. You can implement the model specifically for your organisation.
  • Scalability - Since it is not stick to templates you are able to expand the model for other domains as well.
  • Reporting - Several ways of reporting are possible and each has their own benefit/purpose.
  • Strong/Powerfull Calculation Engine delivering fast results/speed to insight
  • User Interface is minimized to what you need and is not showing off all the functions it can "also" do
  • Strong audittrail
  • Appears to be almost unlimited in what you are able to create
Read full review
Cons
  • Board BI tool has a steep learning curve and can be challenging for a new user to reach to board's full capacity.
  • We have to use a windows scheduler to schedule data import tasks; it would be great if Board could provide its own scheduler.
Read full review
  • Automated rebuild Indexing of tables and calcs, or next best thing, automated reports to list what should have its index rebuilt.
  • To have the functionality for a conditional entry on the ICM scheduler. E.g. if ICM table has fieldx = 'Y' then we run a specific row in the ICM scheduler else it's skipped.
  • The ability to download data in csv, Excel … from the "History Viewer" of tables that have changes tracked.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Board is a fantastic product for swift BI solution delivery when compared with its peers. Ease of use, support and integration with Microsoft Office Addin open a wide horizon of opportunities for further enhancements to solutions. Easy bespoke app development capabilities make it a winner for us. BOARD is just like a white canvas, it lets you explore your creative side while designing and delivering a solution
Read full review
Varicent is a system you build for your unique needs and business objectives. Once this is in place you can adjust and change accordingly. This system has the flexibility to change in correlation with the needs of your business. From simple viewing adjustments to changing the whole landscape of your operations this system can be modified in whatever direction necessary. Also with the growing popularity of handheld devices this system is at a huge advantage by being accessible from the Ipad
Read full review
Usability
Overall, Board is easy to use and develop for. Users can quickly get up to speed and begin using with only a small amount of training. Generally, it takes longer to explain the data structure (our customization) than it does to explain the tool itself. The most consistent challenge we run into is hierarchy management. New members have to be mapped to each level of an entity. While there is a "normalization" process, it often fails to map correctly or in rare cases can change custom mapping that was previously set up.
Read full review
Any calculations can be implemented as there are hardly any limitations on complexity. However, online real-time usability is lacking - a simple user enters, and the system calculates work in a way that it is in the browser and hence still needs overnight to be properly reflected in the batch calculations and backend tables.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Never went down in last 3 years that I worked with it (every hour of the day basically). That is a 10 in my book.
Read full review
Performance
very fast and no integration problems
Read full review
All is fast, but with API's it is sometimes slower due to the application we are pulling data from. Reports are loaded directly or within seconds and our reports are very detailed with many columns and rows.
Read full review
Support Rating
The only time I needed assistance was due to a problem in
the prints: the colors of the brochures as they were on the screen were not
reproduced in the print, but a series of standard colors were reproduced. This
fact made colored numbers on a colored background illegible. From the
assistance they confirmed that it was a problem of version 10.2 that occurred
when leaving the brochures with the default colors proposed by Board. To obtain
the desired colors, they had to be personalized ... I didn't like the solution
very much and the technician who recommended it didn't like me either, but they
would have solved the problem with the following versions. In any case, the
assistance was quick and effective even if not exactly efficient.
Read full review
Giving a 10 would suggest there is no room for improvement. I don't feel like their support is perfect. However, I have never met another team that was more dedicated to making sure we get what we want and need.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Board is fairly simple and straight forward. Advance training on workflows and procedures is a good one but the training content only touches through the interesting areas. training content needs to cover a few areas more in-depth
Read full review
The training was good in general with a nice trainer as well. But, the training could be better if it is more focussed on our process/data etc.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
There is a learning portal with many videos about navigation, creating reports and managing your model.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The problem of user profiling in our context is certainly
quite complex. The complexity is given by the fact that the company is divided
territorially into logistic points of sale, but at the same time they are
virtually divided into divisions (or specific implementation areas) and points
of sale of competence. The same operator can have access to data at different
logistic sales points, sales points of competence and divisions.
Read full review
Test test test. Make sure that the product is calculating everyone 100% correctly. DO NOT accept a 70% pass rate as some companies would like to have you believe is acceptable. This means conducting thorough testing by providing 100% of all expected results, but it will be worth it when you know that the compensation plans are working entirely as expected.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We earlier used Planful, which was also a good product but not as good as Board. The backend reporting and analysis of data are top-notch. The reports generated are quick and accurate. Board also offers to learn to upskill the team so that they can use the tool effectively and collaborate.
Read full review
In 2015, we used a scorecard containing 80 attributes in our review of Oracle, Callidus, and Xactly & Varicent. Oracle did not have true self serve capabilities- programming was heavily required, not intuitive, out of the box functionality was limited. Callidus & Xactly could not provide us a demo using our data, statements could not be sent out in bulk form, difficulty in importing/exporting to CRM. Varicent excelled in most areas and was the clear winner.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It is very scalable and adaptable to changing complexities of calculations and business rules under a variety of different scenarios. It does not get full points because in large data loads the time needed to calculate and import the data increases exponentially and may cause issues related to timing potentially.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • With effective financial analysis and planning and using Board, we were able to see a +18% QoQ revenue increase consistently for seven months straight
  • Using Board Dashboards, the senior management was able to better & clearly understand the financial position of the company at a given time and take better strategic decisions
Read full review
  • Compliance - with a central system used for calculation incentive payments and commissions, we are able to provide reports and data showing every detail of how payments are calculated and why they are justified. We can also identify anomalies and outliers.
  • Integration with our payroll system is seamless. Except for regular pay, nothing goes to payroll without going through ICM. The process for paying incentives/bonuses/commissions is now very structured and efficient.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Board Screenshots

Screenshot of PlanningScreenshot of Sales PlanningScreenshot of ProfitabilityScreenshot of GeomapScreenshot of ForecastScreenshot of Financial Plan

Varicent Screenshots

Screenshot of Varicent providing clarity and transparency to sellers, helping them to find answers faster and have confidence in compensation plans.Screenshot of Tools for sellers that help them align strategic initiatives, and that help them understand which deals will help them win.Screenshot of Varicent ICM model compensation plans that display the financial impact of changes. Its ability to more accurately forecast commission payouts with “what-if” assumptions, users can budget more effectively for sales compensation costs, manage target total compensation for sales representatives and assess plan effectiveness.Screenshot of Shareable information sent to the right people to drive the right results.