BrowserStack vs. Tricentis Tosca

BrowserStack

Tricentis Tosca

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
BrowserStack	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	BrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.	$0 per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
Tricentis Tosca	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…	N/A

Pricing

BrowserStack

Tricentis Tosca

Editions & Modules

Percy - Free: $0
per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
App Percy - Free: $0
per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
Test Observability - Unlimited Free: $0
Accessibility Testing - Free: $0
Test Observability - Observability Pro: $0.01
per month per test execution
Percy - Desktop: $0.02
per month per screenshot
App Percy - Visual Core: $0.02
per month per screenshot
Percy - Desktop & Mobile: $0.02
per month per screenshot
App Percy - Visual Cloud: $0.03
per month per screenshot
Live - Desktop: $29
per month per user
Live - Desktop & Mobile: $39
per month per user
App Live - Individual: $39
per month per user
Automate - Desktop: $129
per month 1 parallel test
Live - Team: $150
per month 5 users
App Live - Team: $150
per month 5 users
Automate - Desktop & Mobile: $199
per month 1 parallel test
App Automate - Device Cloud: $199
per month 1 parallel test
App Live - Team Pro: $199
per month 5 users
Accessibility Testing - Team: $199
per month 5 users
App Automate - Device Cloud Pro: $249
per month 1 parallel test
Automate - Enterprise: Contact sales team
Percy - Enterprise: Contact Sales
App Automate - Enterprise: Contact Sales
App Live - Enterprise: Contact sales team
Live - Enterprise: Contact sales team
App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud: Contact Sales
App Percy - Enterprise: Contact Sales
Test Observability - Enterprise: Contact Sales
Accessibility Testing - Enterprise: Contact Sales

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
BrowserStack	Tricentis Tosca
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
	BrowserStack	Tricentis Tosca
Considered Both Products	BrowserStack MP Mayur Patil Software Test Engineer Chose BrowserStack When it comes to cross-device testing, or what can be said as Live testing, BrowserStack is the best tool for testing with different devices with different OSs at a time. It gives users the liberty to test on iPhone, iPad, or Android devices and check the UI on all different … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack It's easy to use, Cost effective and Reliable. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack Both tools are good and we are suing both for better testing. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack Screen reader capability in the mobile and Tablet devices Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack LambdaTest Incentivized Helpful? Tara Saxon Founder Chose BrowserStack Nothing else actually. BrowserStack was recommended to me as the best, simplest, go-to solution. I found it to be very user friendly and satisfied my requirements, so I was happy to stick with it and did not go elsewhere looking for anything else. This experience has been more … Incentivized Helpful? BD Bibhishan Dhagate Senior QA Engineer Chose BrowserStack DigitalOcean Kubernetes and AWS Amplify Incentivized Helpful? Suman Kumar Suman Tech Architect Chose BrowserStack BrowserStack provides User-friendly UI which helps me to easily use the tool and also configuration via code is easy, we have to just add the config JSON and update the devices there on which we want to automate. Realtime view of the app is a plus point, reporting is also there. Incentivized Helpful? BS Brij Shah Test Lead Chose BrowserStack Opkey (now with pCloudy) Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack I haven't used any tool so I cannot rate any other tool. BrowserStack was the first tool we selected for our proof of concept and we liked it. We found some limitations and we reported those to BrowserStack and now they have added it in their roadmap to fix it. So overall, we … Incentivized Helpful? SH Sandeep Hassan Narayana Wow Quality Automation Specialist Chose BrowserStack Capture screenshots across many devices , platforms , os devices specific views no code setup for these capturing Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack I found Browserstack's website very informative and their documentation much more detailed than the other products I tried to explore. Also one more aspect where Browserstack stood out for me for other similar vendors is that they provide a 100 minute free trial for any newly … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack Genymotion Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack SauceLabs was not intuitive. The launch response time was too high. It didn't offer flexibility in debugging, and the other testing features were not easily available. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack Only other thing we have used is local simulators. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack More devices , more features and easy to use Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack Our department manager ultimately decided to go with BrowserStack as they offered more real-world devices in their cloud than LambdaTest. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack We did a benchmark to compare multiple criterias: Security, reliability, Sound, Variety of devices, availability of devices, how long before new released devices are made available, easy to use, extra features, customer support, company reference, integration with our tools. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack The ease of BrowserStack usage is very good compared to other tools like LambdaTest. For each application or use case BrowserStack has solutions. What I think is when It comes to integrations with test automation frameworks BrowserStack can be improved and it needs to improve. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack TestRail, very configurable in fields and how test case mgmt can be configured. Incentivized Helpful? Ryan Mazzucchi 💻💪 Web Developer Chose BrowserStack While Chrome DevTools is great for on-the-fly CSS editing and JS testing, its device manager can be off. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack - Not userfriendly Incentivized Helpful? Jiancong Lu QA Analyst Chose BrowserStack BrowserStack by far is still the best tool we have for mobile and accessibility testing. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack UI of the BrowserStack is little bit better that other market competitors, and also it is little bit faster that other tools which are available in the market. BrowserStack also provides lots of real devices almost every device which are in the markets, other tools are not … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BrowserStack accessiBE is an accessibility only tool that cannot replicate browsers or devices. LambdaTest is comparable, however, after assessing the feature set, ultimately we decided BrowserStack was a better fit for our business. LambdaTest does have features that will meet most … Incentivized Helpful?	Tricentis Tosca Sushmita Patil Senior Business Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Depending on the prices concern and fast execution Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports … Incentivized Helpful? juan eng paw Senior Technical Manager SA Chose Tricentis Tosca UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has higher stability than Certica Solutions Incentivized Helpful? Yogendra Singh Test Automation Expert Chose Tricentis Tosca As Tricentis Tosca is one of the first tools to implement the model based test automation, it is way ahead of the similar kind of tools. be it creating and innovating new strategies to overcome the existing hurdles faced during automation like, self healing feature is quite … Incentivized Helpful? AB Atanu Biswas Automation and Performance Test Lead Chose Tricentis Tosca Selenium, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and ACCELQ Incentivized Helpful? Mouleeswaran Andi E Test Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Even though selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in selenium. Using selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. … Incentivized Helpful? Anant Joshi Sr. Director Chose Tricentis Tosca The overall user experience and the ease of use while automation ERP system was better in Tricentis Tosca. The integration was seamless especially for SAP and SFDC system. I think the maintenance efforts required in Tricentis Tosca is very less as compared to Katalon. The … Incentivized Helpful? Sneha Gangan Manore Senior Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca This tool covers all from functional testing to rpa and mobile testing cloud based testing visual testing and accessibility testing is easily possible. It is easy to implement start work in less time. All the testing kinds performance can also be tested and customized reports … Incentivized Helpful? Ganesh Muralidharan Global Delivery Head Chose Tricentis Tosca Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Good on flexibility and provided much option to cover different aspects of automation testing. Incentivized Helpful? BW Bernd Weigl Teamleiter Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis Tosca Best Module and Scan approach, Libs rule, and PL Libs are the best things ever! Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Software Engineer Chose Tricentis Tosca As our product required wide rage of testing start from web testing to desktop automation also, we gone through the feature provided by Tosca and decided it will be good fit for end to end automation. Even though from our team no one is aware of how to use the tools, the guide … Incentivized Helpful? Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Chose Tricentis Tosca Other tools are focused on limited applications or technologies. With Tricentis Tosca you can do almost everything which makes it one-stop solution for all needs.Tosca is codeless vs others which requires coding. Tosca has inbuilt repository which other tools lack. Tosca also … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca provides a uniform interface for al testers and avoids the requirement for coding. Tricentis Tosca also offers test capabilities across the enterprise that other tools do not. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is better as the first testing tool to introduce in a news organization. I believe it's the testing tool that is the easiest to introduce and adopt. It is oriented toward manual testers that would like to start automation but it is less oriented toward … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Mostly the ease of use from day one by introducing the no-code approach for teams with non-technical contributors. Also, the amount of technologies it covers is greater than other tools that are specialized in web-only or API, for example. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has more functionality and is easier to implement. It also has more compatibility with other applications, and the support is much more responsive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is an easy to use tool which can apply to almost any business process. The customer support program appears to be a program which will put the use of the tool on track with our protfolios. Ease of implementation and total application capabilities across … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Because of it's great support for cross browser/cross device and devops, this really makes the cut against it's peers. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca I have really minimum exposure with QTP and ALM, barely 2 months or so, for this reason I would not like to comment on how Tosca stacks up against them, but something that I really like about Selenium is that it is really simple and easy to setup, doesn't require a heavy … Incentivized Helpful? Raghuram Rangamani Associate Project Manager Chose Tricentis Tosca Before going in for TOSCA we tried to use Selenium / UFT. But TOSCA stacked much ahead than other tools. Incentivized Helpful? DL david leo Developer Chose Tricentis Tosca Its easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca qTest is the "brain" of the suite. You can use just Tricentis Tosca and can be enough to have results, but if you want have the management of executions, results and even manual test, this is your app. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

BrowserStack

Tricentis Tosca

Automation Testing

Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
	BrowserStack - Ratings	Tricentis Tosca 8.3 Ratings 2% below category average
Record and Automate	00 Ratings	7.70 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Mobile Testing	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings
Test Scheduling	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Test Management	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Parallel Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Object Recognition	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Real Device Testing	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	BrowserStack	Tricentis Tosca
Small Businesses	TestComplete Score 8.0 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	BrowserStack	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	8.3 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.4 (0 ratings)	7.7 (0 ratings)
Usability	5.5 (0 ratings)	3.6 (0 ratings)
Availability	9.8 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	2.2 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	6.1 (0 ratings)	8.2 (0 ratings)
In-Person Training	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Online Training	4.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Configurability	7.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	9.8 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	BrowserStack	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	Multiple real devices available for testing across different OS, platform and browsers for both website and mobile application testing. Automate help to integrate existing project and testing suite to run across different devices. This reduce testing timeline and allow us to quickly release new features to users. Also provide automated accessibility report. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tricentis Tosca is well suited for packaged applications like SAP, Salesforce, Workday, etc. It also works well with API testing and Web UI testing. Tosca is highly suited for Projects which require a high level of collaboration between team members across different locations. It's less suited for mobile automation, Reporting, and test scenarios with high input data. Incentivized Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Read full review
Pros	UI testing on different Devices like iOS, Android, MacOS, and Windows OS. Automation testing with the help of Cypress gives automation access to different OS and devices. Comparison with two devices how UI will look a like. Bug Capture tool: Using this tool, a user can capture a bug while live recording it, and the tool captures action as well. This helps developers identify and fix the bug more easily. MP Mayur Patil Software Test Engineer Read full review	Tosca provides a one-stop solution for your test-automation needs. One can use it to automate testing of desktop (web/stand-alone) applications, Mobile(Native as well as Web) applications etc. It is a great tool since it not only helps in test automation but also in maintaining a suite for Manual testing. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	I wish it didn't time out so quickly. I often move back and forth between my native Mac OS system and browsers to BrowserStack for Windows browsers and it often times out so I have to start over. I am not sure why, but when I've been testing in BrowserStack for a long period of time - maybe over a couple of hours, it sometimes gets buggy and unresponsive or slow to respond. It makes it hard to tell if I'm experiencing an issue with the site I'm testing or if it's an issue with BrowserStack. If I'm wishing for the moon and stars, I'd ask for the ability to use BrowserStack to also test with JAWS screen reader. But I'm happy having NVDA. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue Incentivized AI Alexandru Cristian Ion QA Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	It's simply a must-have tool. As a designer, I have to ensure my work is at least functional in older browsers. I also have to ensure that, when I design for mobile devices, any differences between platforms aren't problematic. BrowserStack allows me to test my work in a fraction of the time, with a whole lot more accuracy. Eric Karkovack Owner Read full review	We aim to renew Tosca for our organization. What we lose in license cost is gained by having employee that do not need programming background. We also recoup a lot of the cost on the rapidity of automation. Only the support we might not use as much. I believe Tosca is here to stay at our organization Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	It integrates directly in internal networks and local development. The point and click interface of choosing your device, pick the browser/version and you have a working emulation of that exact environment. What else could you ask for? I've set our least computer savvy users up with BrowserStack for testing in minutes. It feels like it's just part of your local environemnt. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Reliability and Availability	I rated BrowserStack's availability a 10 because it is consistently reliable, with minimal to no downtime or unplanned outages. The platform is accessible whenever needed, ensuring uninterrupted testing. Its robust infrastructure and proactive monitoring ensure a seamless experience, allowing us to meet deadlines without delays caused by availability issues and all Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI. Incentivized Steven Boutcher QA Automation Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	I'm saying a 10 for support for BrowserStack only based on feedback from the development team. I myself have never had to reach out to support for any questions or issues, but others in the company have. From my conversations with them, the support was fantastic and had been a pleasure working with the BrowserStack team. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
In-Person Training	Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Online Training	It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Implementation Rating	I rated the implementation satisfaction an 8 because while it went smoothly overall, there were some challenges during the initial learning phase and integration with existing tools. Key insights include the importance of providing sufficient training upfront and ensuring seamless integration with other systems to minimize disruptions and improve adoption speed. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	N/A - BrowserStack was the first software I've tried to address these requirements. Previously we've been limited to testing on a handful of devices and browser combinations that our team has physical access to. We're also evaluating Litmus as a complementary service to BrowserStack for analysing our email templates and deliverability. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports are very helpful and allows us to solve our issues independently. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Scalability	I may not be the best person to answer this as I am only using it for 1 department and at 1 site but will still try my best As far as Scalability for Devices for Mobile Automation is concerned, it gets a Solid 10, as the users can run cases on upto 10 device parallel and also have the best choices of devices to choose Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	It reduced the cost of buying multiple devices as we have multiple devices access in it Easily accessible from anywhere due to it cloud availability Introducing this to our client also helped us in building trust as well as winning their confidence during deliverables Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It really had a very good impact on our ROI. We were able to automate most of the apps and layers with in it and get a very short execution time which led to increased releases with in short span of time. Time to market really improved and efficiency of developing scripts was not too bad. With built in test dashboards, it was easy to pull metrics and share the insights with management. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	BrowserStack Screenshots	Tricentis Tosca Screenshots