#1 most frequent
United States of America
47.6%939 installations of 1,973
Categories & Use Cases
Media
1 / 13
Screenshot of where no-code, model-based test automation separates the technical information of an application into reusable, no-code modules that can be updated as applications change, which auto-updates test cases.
Top Performing Features
Object Recognition
The product is able to find and interact with user interface elements on a web page or application, to suggest fixes and/or make it easier to keep test elements in sync with the actual web page or application.
Category average: 8.5
Data-Driven Testing
Users can run the same test script with different inputs to test out multiple different scenarios.
Category average: 8.6
Multi-Browser Testing
Users can ensure that web applications work seamlessly across different browsers.
Category average: 7.9
Areas for Improvement
Real Device Testing
The product provides access to real hardware devices for testing on different platforms. Tests are run using your own devices or using provided simulated devices.
Category average: 7.2
Record and Automate
Users can record manual test cases and can automate test scripts for reuse.
Category average: 7.9
Mobile Testing
Allows users to automate testing on mobile devices for iOS and Android platforms.
Category average: 7.8
Who Buys & Uses Tricentis Tosca
#2 most frequent
India
7.4%146 installations of 1,973
#3 most frequent
Germany
6.6%130 installations of 1,973
Pros
- User-friendly interface
- Quick learning curve compared to coded automation
- Resilient automation for web-based applications
Easy to use Tricentis Tosca
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We are using Tricentis Tosca to test API and UI with low code and no code. This helps us to automate very fast. We are using Tricentis Tosca for our regression suite and sanity testing. we are also scheduling out automation and running it nightly every day. It help in. finding code quality and reduce bugs.
Pros
- Test automation
- Statergy
- regression suite
Cons
- Providing a cloud version
- Support
- better documentation
Return on Investment
- Usability
- Reliability
- Reuse
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Playwright
Other Software Used
Postman, Selenium, Playwright
The Easiest Path to GUI Test Automation
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Tricentis Tosca to automate end to end testing and our regression suite. Our regression suite usually takes 1 day to execute with help of 6 QAs, but with Tricentis Tosca, we get the job done in half day.The tool is super easy to learn, has good learning material, quite powerful for test data creation.
Pros
- easy to learn
- good learning material
- powerful for test data creation
Cons
- slightly expensive (as all commercial solutions)
- heavier on infrastructure
- ci/cd integration could have been easier
Return on Investment
- Our regression suite used to take 1 day with 6 QAs manually, now with Tosca it takes roughly over 3 hours
- Test case creation time is reduced
- Automation coverage is increased by 20%
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Eggplant, from Keysight, UiPath Automation Platform, Testsigma and ACCELQ
Other Software Used
Watermelon, Testsigma, ACCELQ
Tricentis Tosca a winwin to automate your QA process
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We're using Tricentis Tosca to automate all e2e tests. In a cloud solution and CI/CD instead run locally. Tricentis Tosca help us to build a full solution with a little effort and a very user friendly interface. In addition, is easy to work with daily results and create reports each days to control the current situation of project.
Pros
- Scan and discover almost of elements and attributtes of them
- User friendly UI
Cons
- Dashboard to check results from ppl outside of team (managers for example)
Return on Investment
- Return on Investment
- Easy and fast executions
- very complete suite and integrates well with existing tools
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Tricentis qTest
A Users Take on Tricentis Tosca Strengths and Limitations
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
For about two years, my team used Tricentis Tosca primarily for automating both API and front-end tests for our B2B and B2C web shop applications. While it was central to our testing efforts on these platforms, we occasionally faced challenges finding clear solutions in the documentation or getting timely support solely through the community forums.
Pros
- Easier to use in comparison with coded Automation (e.g. Java + Selenium)
- Easy to reuse components
- Handles API tests pretty fast
Cons
- Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all
- The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue
Return on Investment
- Reduced testing costs
- Increased automation rates
- Reduced regression times
- Faster testing cycles
Usability
Other Software Used
Microsoft Teams, Google Chrome, Mailinator, Screenpresso, Postman
Tricentis Tosca automation tool helped us get started on our Automation test Journey
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Tricentis Tosca to build our UI automation testing for several different applications. Tosca actually helped us to setup our initial automation from scratch as our company had none and we had to quickly ramp up. Tosca's module based automation as well as quick and easy use helped the team quickly create automated regression test cases which helped our QA testing immensely. We've been able to use Tosca to support many of our company's applications. We've found many different uses of Tosca in our automation from creating test data to end-to-end systems testing as well as selective automated regression of different systems. Without a doubt Tosca has been able to cut our manual testing by helping us increase test coverage through automated regression which releases our manual testers to do more boundary and negative scenarios while repetitive and high level systems flows are taken care of by test automation. We continually add automated cases to our overall regression sets and have built an extensive regression test library. With the module based approach we are able to make quick changes to our automated test cases and thus save time and test effort. Currently we are studying and using the latest AI updates to Tosca which has enable us to automated even those most difficult to automate applications which used to be not automatable due to developers not following good standards using identifiers to fields. All in all I would recommend Tosca over open source due to the excellent support Tricentis provides to it's clients.
Pros
- Module-based approach makes updates easier
- Quick ramp up and non coding/scripting technical makes the tool easy to pick up and use
- New AI functionality helps to add additional support to automating test cases
- Excellent support
Cons
- 3rd party integration with tools such as ALM
- Better BDD support as everyone is going Agile
- Execution a bit slow and lagging behind open source test execution
Return on Investment
- reduced testing cycle, quick ramp up
- increased test coverage
- scheduled daily and nightly regression
Usability
Other Software Used
Selenium, OpenText UFT One, Detox
