CallFire vs. Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CallFire
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
CallFire is a VoIP and messaging solution designed for both external B2C interactions and internal company use. It includes features such as text messaging, call tracking, voice broadcasting, and an interactive voice response (IVR) system. Subscription pricing starts at $99 per month.
$99
per month
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Call Manager is a unified call control center from Cisco that supports enterprise collaboration functions across the spectrum of IP telephony, video & web conferencing, and messaging. Features include call forwarding, call back, call transfer, ad hoc conferencing, and call park.N/A
Pricing
CallFireCisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Editions & Modules
Lite
$99.00
per month
Startup
$199.00
per month
Grow
$299.00
per month
Pro
$599.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CallFireCisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CallFireCisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Considered Both Products
CallFire
Chose CallFire
EZ Texting... it's fine but more expensive. They do the same thing.
Chose CallFire
We also use CallRail in our agency but find that most of our needs are met by CallFire for less money.
Chose CallFire
Previously we used Vitelity, but its tracking capabilities are more limited.
Chose CallFire
We considered Trello before deciding on CallFire. Trello is a good service that seems to do much of what CallFire does, however we wanted to avoid the labor-hours necessary to get Trello up to speed, as it is very technically involved. We didn't want to hire any additional …
Chose CallFire
CallFire has a pricing structure that is attractive to us as a small business. The "pay as you use" options helps us keep our overhead low, especially with so many softwares already in our tech stack. It's a tremendous value for the cost!
Chose CallFire
I have not personally used any similar products.
Chose CallFire
CallFire has adapted and changed internally ever since I [have] used it. It is has become, quicker, cleaner and much easier to use. I haven't used any other systems, however I thoroughly enjoy the efficiency and ease to build custom campaigns in minutes. I highly recommend …
Chose CallFire
I haven't used any other products, but I am so pleased with CallFire that I will continue using this program.
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
I would say it is a tie with IP office. This is also a complex solution that's usually managed by a service provider but offers high quality via phones that are excellent in sound quality and overall reputation for reliability.
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager is a great competitor to Avaya Aura, whereas both solutions provide the client an Enterprise - Grade UC solution. I would prefer Cisco Unified Communications Manager because most corporate networks run on a Cisco backend core, and assigning …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
CUBE is a robust gateway works in conjunction with Cisco Unified Communications Manager for providing PSTN calling facility. CUBE is easy to set up and manage and it has lots of security features. SRST is one of the best feature where in case of a network issue with the Cisco …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Avaya Aure requires lots of system maintenance and requirements. Also, Avaya cm does not have a graphical user interface. Avaya deployment requires lots of VMs and this is not acceptable for a clients 3CX is very cheap but they are very vulnerable to the attacks. Also they …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Avaya Aura
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager) in general is more a telephony platform that a Unified Communications suite, but it could fit smaller companies or certain industries with specific requirements or needs, like hospitality.
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Simple, all products mentioned were on-premise (that solution I used several years ago) Call manager is a cloud solution without hardware required.
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
As per the comments earlier, Cisco's focus has finally moved to Cloud and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager) primarily stays as it solves specific business problems that Cloud-based platforms are trying to solve, slowly but surely. Cisco Unified Communications …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Most commonly used here in our country is Avaya; they pretty much do the same as the Cisco Unified Communications Manager. But for me, Cisco products are more reliable and tested so I prefer using this as our mode of communication for our entire organization. It keeps the …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
The Cisco Call Manager application has been around for much longer than many of the competitors. As such, they have had plenty of time to resolve bugs and increase the feature set that comes natively with this solution. One of the biggest factors for us was the professional …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Avaya is extremely expensive for a corporate telephony infrastructure, its a product designed for the callcenter so it makes it even impossible to go with it for just corporate telephony.
Cisco Call Manager is not just cheaper but also much simpler to use.
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Because of the complexity and quantity of users and remote offices distributed along several countries Cisco Unified Call Manager was the best option that suits all our needs and requirements also the most affordable alternative, and in terms of future projects the most robust …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
We have been a Cisco based shop and have looked at other cloud voice options such as MS Teams pbx, and others, but ultimately, the features, endpoints, and reliability of Cisco has been the common factor in staying with them as our voice provider. Their integrations, room …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
CUCM is actually our old system that we're currently transitioning away from. While CUCM certainly has more features than the Microsoft Teams phone system, and it's far more customizable, what we really needed currently was a cloud system that allowed more options for remote …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
The number one point for which I would choose the Call Manager is because it has a wide level of scalability. You can have it in a company with 200 phones or up to 10000. In addition, Cisco TAC offers excellent support for when there is a disaster or you need to make some …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
CUCM can grow to any scale you want. You can have a small amount of users, to tens of thousands of phones to support any size your company grows to. Toll bypass via routing calls over the WAN as well as an extensive Unity voicemail system allows for efficient routing of your …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
We choose the Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager) for the following reasons:
1- Great features from the customer's perspective.
2- More stability and scalability for large companies
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
We've used 3Com/HP VCX before HP pulled the plug. Feature to feature, in some cases VCX did things better than Call Manager. VCX's GUI interface was very simple to navigate. Even over the years, VCX made it easy to train someone as an admin within a day and that person would be …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
We had a great experience with Cisco IP phone communicator and this was the main reason why this new solution was purchased. Some members were more likely to purchase Skype for Business solutions but in the end, the good experience with Cisco solutions made the difference.
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
It was less expensive and we are able to change partners. Mitel's system is not very friendly for the customer who is tied to a poor vendor.
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
I've used CUCM and it's related products for over 25 years but in the middle of that time I managed a network that had hosted voip, so I know the difference. Hosted voip can't do literally everything like CUCM can do, but it's WAY simpler to operate and manage. Plus the end …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
The lack of support partners for Skype for Business is one of the reasons CUCM stacks up against it. The software itself from MS is not bad, but it's hard to find support. Also, Cisco offers a full-stack solution in the same box, while the Skype for Business architecture is way …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
We've had the system for a number of years and the technology has changed over that time. We anticipate this system will be functional for us for at least 10 years. At that time, we'll start evaluating new technology to see if the Opex model is better in the long run than the …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Ultimately it will come down to the administrator's preference. Cisco has led the market for some time. But Avaya continues to make advancements that are comparable to Cisco. Microsoft is also attempting to break into the market but does [not] have the end to end solution like …
Chose Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
No other evaluated solutions provided the required scale and availability in combination with the central solution approach. All other solutions required more onsite equipment to provide the same services or had issues to provide services on a global scale
Features
CallFireCisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
CallFire
7.6
Ratings
5% below category average
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
7.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Hosted PBX6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)9.00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
User templates7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Call reports7.20 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Directory of employee names9.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
CallFire
9.3
Ratings
10% above category average
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
8.2
Ratings
2% below category average
Answering rules8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Call recording10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Call park8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Call screening10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Message alerts10.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
CallFire
10.0
Ratings
22% above category average
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Video conferencing10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Audio conferencing10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Video screen sharing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Instant messaging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
CallFire
8.3
Ratings
4% above category average
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Mobile app for iOS8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CallFireCisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CallFireCisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CallFireCisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Likelihood to Recommend
If you need to find a test candidate for your client quickly, this is one of the best ways. Pull yourself a hot list of a couple hundred potential candidates and load them in to CallFire. Then get ready to hit about 50-60 calls per hour. You should have a great test candidate for your client in about 24 hours! It's amazing how quickly you can show your clients the true speed of your company.
Read full review
The Cisco Unified Communications Manager platform would be most suited for the below scenarios. 1. An organization with very restricted policies and compliance where can't move to cloud-based solutions for data security. They can install the CUCM on-premises. 2. An organization that is still on a legacy phone system could adopt CUCM to save costs and have better services.
Read full review
Pros
  • CallFire has amazing organization as far as categories and campaigns and all aspects go.
  • It is very easy to use and understand! Very user friendly.
  • Customer service and help is awesome! There have been some times when I have needed assistance and they were always so quick to reply.
Read full review
  • Customizability - The program allows for a lot of specific features and ways to use the program.
  • Traditional - The system is a very traditional phone system, with everything you would expect and need from an enterprise phone system.
  • Expandable - The system allows from a small amount of users to a large amount, with no upper limit.
Read full review
Cons
  • The services are easy to use and robust, but there is room for improvement. Unfortunately, not much has changed over the last 2 years of use. There haven't been any new features or innovations in that time.
  • API integration and automation is not easy for most folks to jump into and there is very little technical support or documentation to take advantage of such features.
  • The standard reports are generally sufficient, but there isn't any customization or intelligence available.
Read full review
  • CUCM is overly complex and requires a very capable engineer to maintain it. Similarly, implementing anything new requires a great deal of specialized knowledge of CUCM.
  • CUCM is difficult to troubleshoot because of it's complexity.
  • CUCM is expensive licensing and they nickel and dime you with a plethora of tiny little license charges for every little feature. They have the most convoluted licensing models, ever, for their CU products in general.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
There is no reason not to, it has proven effective in the usage
Read full review
We have been using this product for 20+ years and will continue too. This is a great product and new features are always coming out.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Although it's very easy to use, once you understand the concepts of IP telephony, as I said before, I think Cisco could have improved the management interface of the platform, adding modern technologies and the design language of the other platforms like DNA Center, etc. This interface hasn't had a substantial improvement for about 10 years
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
CUCM is supported by most third-party vendors for related products, so it makes finding solutions to specific needs easy. Also Cisco TAC is very knowledgeable, and we have never run into a problem they have not been able to resolve. Usually they are resolved without the need to escalate tickers either.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
This was the first phone system we implemented that could span multiple locations. We were very satisfied once fully implemented
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We considered Trello before deciding on CallFire. Trello is a good service that seems to do much of what CallFire does, however we wanted to avoid the labor-hours necessary to get Trello up to speed, as it is very technically involved. We didn't want to hire any additional developers just to get Trello set up and maintained. With CallFire, it was very intuitive and easy to setup quickly.
Read full review
The Cisco Call Manager application has been around for much longer than many of the competitors. As such, they have had plenty of time to resolve bugs and increase the feature set that comes natively with this solution. One of the biggest factors for us was the professional services/support that comes along with using any Cisco product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I sent out a broadcast message pretty deep in our data base, well three years out. I had one customer come in and buy thanking me for contacting her.
  • Our holiday season was up 35% over last year, this year we used CallFire more than we did in the past.
Read full review
  • Return on Investment as one shot investment was made then only licensing contract renewing is needed.
  • Virtualized environment and centralized administration tools.
  • Money saving as a result on using features like TEHO.
  • Business continuity assured on environments with SRST and Multi site Deployment with Distributed Call Processing.
Read full review
ScreenShots