Carbonite Server vs. Quest Rapid Recovery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Carbonite Server
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite Server (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a full backup and discovery solution. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite Server users can protect virtually any type of file on both physical and virtual servers, NAS, SAN and external hard drives. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution assures that users without an IT department and those that are the IT department…
$800.04
per year
Quest Rapid Recovery
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Quest Rapid Recovery is a data backup and restore offering from Dell. It provides virtual standby, encryption, replication, deduplication, and the ability for users to run without restore.
$1,819.99
Pricing
Carbonite ServerQuest Rapid Recovery
Editions & Modules
Power
$800.04
per year
Ultimate
1,300.08
per year
License + 1 Year 24/7 Maintenance
1,819.99
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Carbonite ServerQuest Rapid Recovery
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTrial and paying customers have access to our valet install free of charge. Call and speak to a specialist who can remotely connect to your machine to ensure it's installed and configured correctly to protect your critical data.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Carbonite ServerQuest Rapid Recovery
Considered Both Products
Carbonite Server
Chose Carbonite Server
We use Easus backup as our on site backup solution. Carbonite is definitely in line with what the industry is offering, with the added reliability of multiple offsite storage locations. I am not sure of a company with as good a reputation.
Chose Carbonite Server
Carbonite Server's direction wasn't really for cloud companies as they are more specialized in robust local backup services. I'm a novice when it comes to server backups and replication, but have learned and picked up a lot from talking to the customer center compared to Veeam …
Chose Carbonite Server
As the Carbonite Server Backup tool is one of the best among all backup tools in the market, we like to opt it for several customers. It's very user friendly and most reliable. Deployment part and support is also good.
Chose Carbonite Server
We migrated from NetBackup as we wanted to get rid of our Tape library and media used. We also compared with Veeam to replace the Carbonite server backup. We changed our plan, as we needed storage. It is not in our budget. We continued with Carbonite as they are cheaper in …
Chose Carbonite Server
I prefer code42's admin console, it was cleaner, more responsive, and easier to navigate. The backup system was very similar.
Chose Carbonite Server
EVault came back as a solid choice, without the added cost of retrieving our data in the event of the emergency.
Chose Carbonite Server
We used Symantec before EVault and our backups were large and took a long time. We were not confident in incremental backups given the amount of data we have, so we needed something that would take a backup and then only grab the changes. Carbonite EVault does that for us.
Chose Carbonite Server
We're in the financial industry, so there are certain standards that we make sure we're following. Outsourcing that role to a specialist in the area helps lighten our work load to we can concentrate on day-to-day business activities and not outside regulations. Flexibility, …
Chose Carbonite Server
We have looked at Symantec Backup Exec and actually use it for some of our less important systems. We are currently taking a look at Veeam as an alternative to EVault because of the real-time replication to live machines that Veeam may be able to provide. But so far, EVault has …
Chose Carbonite Server
We have not used or evaluated other similar products. My only experience in disaster recovery involved backing up to tapes and taking those tapes to an off-site location to restore the system, which was a much longer process.
Chose Carbonite Server
I have used HP Data Protector in the past - prefer EVault because I value the cloud solution for its ease of use and reliability. Like the online portal to manipulate backups because it provides mobility. Also like EVault central control software which is very easy to use just …
Chose Carbonite Server
Product was in place before I started working here. It works well for us because the cost was low and it supported our applications and operating systems. We will be evaluating backup and recovery within 12 months to see if EVault is still the best product for us.
Chose Carbonite Server
I was not involved but major factors were the cloud, no tapes and remote site management
Chose Carbonite Server
Went out of business but they had a sweet appliance that could be moved and the agents could still find it through a cloud/web site that directed it to it's serial number. Made it great to backup laptops too since they moved around and it wasn't always possible to reconfigure …
Chose Carbonite Server
EVault is a cheaper and more reliable solution and has less management and moving parts than the other vendors.
Chose Carbonite Server
Used Symantec Backupexec before Evault. Have not needed to evaluate another product in 8+ years.
Chose Carbonite Server
We use Symantec Backup Exec which backs up to an external hard drive. We wanted a secondary, offsite backup and chose Carbonite as it was reasonably priced and it suited our business needs at this time.
Chose Carbonite Server
Carbonite felt it was much better for us to be on Server Backup incase our server went down.
Chose Carbonite Server
They don't really compare as we use them in different ways.
Chose Carbonite Server
Carbonite sever backup is easy to set up and configure. Cost per byte is reasonable.
Chose Carbonite Server
Honestly the first use I had of this product was because I had inherited it. My first interaction came from a new client who was utilizing the software, this was a few years ago. Since that first interaction I've become more impressed with the software over the years, and when …
Chose Carbonite Server
We used Symantec many years ago, so I don't know that I can compare the two fairly. Backup Exec was hard to use and we backed up on tapes, rather than in the cloud. I feel much more confident in the backups that we have with Carbonite.
Chose Carbonite Server
N/A - since I've always used Carbonite (in lieu of thumb drive backups).
Chose Carbonite Server
Much easier, I love how easy it is to verify my backups. With some other products, I did not really know how they were doing because it was too time-consuming to verify the backup. With carbonite, I get email reports every day with any issues and with successes! That is going …
Quest Rapid Recovery
Chose Quest Rapid Recovery
Quest Rapid Recovery is probably a mid tear backup solution in comparison to its competitors. It is definitely a very good backup solution however is missing some key features and integrations compared to other backup software's. The biggest thing I think it has over its …
Chose Quest Rapid Recovery
I've been using Rapid Recovery for the last 6 years and before that we had used Backup Exec, but it was a different implementation as we were still running backups to LTO3 tapes using the full/incremental backup schemes. So Rapid Recovery (AppAssure at the time) was a big …
Chose Quest Rapid Recovery
In every instance of other solutions we evaluated, Quest (then AppAssure) proved to be more convenient, user-friendly and dollar for dollar seemed to be the most worth the cost. I can't imagine implementing and depending on the others nearly as easily or as confidently as we …
Chose Quest Rapid Recovery
We had Replay in our environment already and the price was right. We figured it might be good to stick with one vendor. Replay was a good product and saved us a couple times with the VM exports. Unfortunately, I can't say the same about AppAssure - anything but headache dealing …
Chose Quest Rapid Recovery
Anything is better than Backup Exec. I believe Veeam is a far superior product in backing up VMs. Veeam does not have any agents that get installed on servers which is always a plus. It also connects directly to vCenter.

Commvault to me is the ultimate solution. The ability to …
Chose Quest Rapid Recovery

AppAssure was the only solution we evaluated and it worked well for us for what we needed it to do. As far as other products we've looked into Veeam but never evaluated as we needed a solution quickly.


Features
Carbonite ServerQuest Rapid Recovery
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite Server
8.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Quest Rapid Recovery
8.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Universal recovery8.30 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Instant recovery8.20 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Recovery verification7.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Business application protection10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression7.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Snapshots10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Flexible deployment7.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Management dashboard7.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Platform support7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Retention options7.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Encryption8.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Carbonite ServerQuest Rapid Recovery
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Carbonite ServerQuest Rapid Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
4.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.4
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Carbonite ServerQuest Rapid Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
A key question is, "how much critical data needs to be backed up?". A follow-up question might be, "what impact would it have on your business and reputation if you were to lose this data or take more than a few days to recover?" If a company's data is not critical or valuable to the success of their business, then this is not a good solution.
Read full review
I belive AppAssure is now part of the Dell protection Suite. We have a very messy backup process where we run several backup products: one product for virtual, one for physical, Appassure for special backup needs. If you are looking at AppAssure, ask yourself if you're willing to use the entire backup suite from Dell. I feel one of the key things for backup is a single pane of glass. Can you manage a majority of your backup needs and processes from this one product
Read full review
Pros
  • Their web portal is easy to use to monitor server, check logs, restore or run an ad-hoc backup job.
  • Minimal problems, but when there is a problem, customer support is friendly and flexible in finding a solution. Contacting through their customer portal is convenient.
  • Competitive pricing for level of service provided.
Read full review
  • Backup email reporting is good.
  • Deduplication makes backing up larger jobs much more manageable.
  • Restoring files is fairly simple and quick.
Read full review
Cons
  • The granular restore tool for exchange, which is needed to restore a specific email rather than an entire mailbox, is a bit combersome. I wish the tool was incorporated into the 'normal' restore features.
  • The inline replication process is very sensitive to available bandwidth. And if bandwidth between source and replication site becomes overused, inline replication fails and 'regular' replication takes its place. I wish inline replication was a bit less 'touchy' and would have a built in 'pause' to allow for the clearing of bandwidth before it fails over to 'regular' replication.
Read full review
  • We have many repository corruptions and have to blow our backups away. I would not recommend using this if you are keeping a long retention.
  • We upgraded the agent and it created a new base image. Duplicate base images are eating up into our repository space.
  • I would like to see the repositories go away and use the type that was introduced for replay.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Carbonite Server Backup does not integrate or support any reporting; it is not good at it. We required monthly and quarterly reports for audit. If we fail in that we get fined or we have to pay a certain amount of money to customer. It does not support cloud instances and we are using N2WS for the cloud instances. This is an additional burden for customers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Product needs a lot of improvements in some features like Cloud and Reporting.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Some of the requests we could not get resolved on time. They took a long time to provide the reason for the issue we had raised.
Read full review
In the very few instances we've needed support they have been quick, friendly, knowledgeable, and dedicated to servicing our needs. That has only improved since AppAssure was bought out by Quest.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We had appliance and we just needed to setup the Director Console which was straight forward and easy.
Read full review
Our initial installation really was not optimum. With the help from Dell Profession Services we were able to get our implementation sized correctly and better understand how to get better deduplication results
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Carbonite Server's direction wasn't really for cloud companies as they are more specialized in robust local backup services. I'm a novice when it comes to server backups and replication, but have learned and picked up a lot from talking to the customer center compared to Veeam where it's mostly just self-learning reading lots of documentation which could be overwhelming at times. We started using Veeam as most of our on-prem servers are ceasing operations as we slowly transition to the cloud. I would still use Carbonite as a fall-back option just in case the cloud fails us. Our company cannot afford to have downtimes as we work closely with a lot of contractors and every minute counts.
Read full review
Price, features, and ease of use made AppAssure an easy decision for us.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • While EVault can become expensive if you have a lot of data to store, but you have to keep in mind that it does not cost you anything more to restore your data in the event of an emergency. Some systems give you a great upfront cost, until you actually need to retrieve your data.
Read full review
  • Because the backup software is so scalable for a Managed Service Provider, it has made managing backups for our clients daily very easy and low effort, thus increasing our revenue.
  • The software runs on a wide range of hardware which has made repurposing older equipment a very effective way of deploying it to our clients cheaply.
  • We have used the backup software for approximately 8-10 years, however the software does not seem to be getting heavily developed which means in comparison to other vendors it is going to quickly become obsolete.
Read full review
ScreenShots