CATCheckpoint vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

CATCheckpoint

CATCheckpoint

6 Reviews and Ratings

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

77 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
CATCheckpoint	Score 5.6 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	CATCheckpoint is a web-based defect identification and remedial management system for construction projects and has roles for main contractors, client, consultants and subcontractors. The vendor states that with its a commercial and residential versions no job is too small or too big, and options are practical and affordable for any size of project and any size of company. The main cloud-based system has an Android phone companion that allows users to identify and update defects while on…	$195 per month
Oracle Primavera	Score 7.7 out of 10	N/A	Oracle’s Primavera is a software suite designed for construction and other asset-intensive industries. It contains a variety of project planning, management, and execution components for buyers to select from.	N/A

Pricing

CATCheckpoint

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Editions & Modules

Residential: $195.00
per month
Commercial: $350.00
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
CATCheckpoint	Oracle Primavera
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

$650 per Client

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	CATCheckpoint	Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Considered Both Products	CATCheckpoint No answer on this topic	Oracle Primavera Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Primavera Oracle Primavera is more easy and integrated with other systems Incentivized Helpful? Mylene Beatty Project Administrator Chose Oracle Primavera Oracle is better laid out and has more functionality as well as end-user flow. The login process, billing, and construction management features are easy to find, easy to use, and helpful. The limitations on Quickbooks restrict users from the ability to view and bill full … Incentivized Helpful? Shiva Krishna Oracle Cloud Consultant Chose Oracle Primavera We use Oracle ERP and are happy with it. We have long-standing relationship with Oracle and our workforce is well versed with it. We wanted a high-end scalable software for construction projects and Primavera fits the bill. Payment systems like Textura can be easily integrated … Incentivized Helpful? Lawrence J Lin Project Analyst Chose Oracle Primavera P6 advantage has better enterprise portfolio features. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Primavera Oracle Primavera is better and faster than the other solutions available. Especially with large data sets. Incentivized Helpful? Kevin Edward B. Lao, P.E. Project Manager Chose Oracle Primavera I have also used Microsoft Project in the past to do scheduling. While easier to use than Primavera, it does not have the same capabilities to determine CPM. Furthermore, it would not be appropriate for larger sized projects. Incentivized Helpful? RW Ryan Weller System Administrator Chose Oracle Primavera I did not select Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. It was an inherent application. Having used other applications, compared to those, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a far superior tool for portfolio management. However, in the span of the last 10 years, there … Incentivized Helpful? Angelique Hamm Preconstruction Project Engineer Chose Oracle Primavera they are completely different programs Incentivized Helpful? Chris Metropulos Product Manager Chose Oracle Primavera When compared to the likes of the field, Oracle is the least friendly in regards to being accessible to the team with Smartsheet working the most favorably in that aspect. Otherwise, Oracle's PM program is more intuitive than Microsoft Project, has more features when compared … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Primavera I found Oracle Primavera better compared to Clarity as it offers better navigation. The reporting feature is also better in Primavera. The views provided by Primavera are far better compared to Clarity. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Primavera Primavera allows several users to work in a single file at the same time. This allows the team to develop and update the project schedule for reporting much faster. Also, the user can see updates that effect logically link activities in the future easily. MS Project does not. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Primavera P6 is the most robust scheduling software I've used. It's the best solution for large-scale projects. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	CATCheckpoint	Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Small Businesses	FollowUp CRM Score 10.0 out of 10	monday.com Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	InEight Score 8.3 out of 10	Planview PPM Pro Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	InEight Score 8.3 out of 10	Planview PPM Pro Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	CATCheckpoint	Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	CATCheckpoint	Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	This program is well suited for online database management for construction-related fields and their contract management. It has many features which allow for reporting, issuance of changes, applications for payment and HB, and related construction-related documentation for both client and user. It also allows one to print and review in PDF any required documentation needed as per contracts. Incentivized Mylene Beatty Project Administrator Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Critical Path Methodology will identify potential issues in on time completion if activities move. A resources loaded schedule can accurately forecast % complete and staffing requirements. Coding allows easy group, sort, and filtering when reporting to certain business units out of the same file. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	The software is high end with rich features, hence its rich price. There is room for improvement in their customer service. Oracle is doing its best in coming up with new features, and has a planned roadmap. It would be good if the enhancements are delivered faster. Incentivized Shiva Krishna Oracle Cloud Consultant Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	Is easy to use but the the interface should be more nice and contemporary Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	I did not select Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. It was an inherent application. Having used other applications, compared to those, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a far superior tool for portfolio management. However, in the span of the last 10 years, there are newer, perhaps better products available. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management does still manage to get the job done, but its time in the sun is fading. Incentivized RW Ryan Weller System Administrator Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	P6 has had measurable ROI in the fact that projects can be completed on schedule or sooner using it. P6 it presents data date stamps, which are used to share with clients during the project for the progress of the schedule. P6 may have a high level of entry to use for the smaller project, which can be a hindrance to use. Incentivized Kevin Edward B. Lao, P.E. Project Manager Read full review
ScreenShots	CATCheckpoint Screenshots