With automation and artificial intelligence, Ceipal’s ATS and CRM solutions help recruiters and staffing professionals to identify, assess, engage, hire, and onboard the best talent.
N/A
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Pricing
Ceipal ATS
PeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ceipal ATS
PeopleFluent
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ceipal ATS
PeopleFluent
Considered Both Products
Ceipal ATS
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Ceipal ATS
Ceipal ATS is the worst possible choice amongst all of the ATS ive used. There is a reason it is dirt cheap.
Ceipal ats help us to find the candidates which are genuine and useful, and we can get the candidate total information by using this ATS, the entire Job history of the candidate in be found using this ATS. it, makes the job easy and quick and it’s not an AI tool
Assistant Manager - Sales and Business Development
Chose Ceipal ATS
Jobdiva is highly complex in terms of candidate finding, creating jobs or creating a vendor list and clients for our database when it is compared to Ceipal, which gives us a platform where it is very easy to use and no complex process while creating jobs or creating a vendor …
I have not used any other ATS other than Ceipal ATS might be its so fortunate that I would not like use any other ATS in future. Its so addictive trust me with its enriched features, integration and customization are surely beneficial and I don't think any other ATS can match …
Navigation is generally intuitive, but could benefit from some streamlining. Ceipal ATS AI search candidate matching capabilities were a significant factor, aiming to improve candidate quality and streamline the hiring process. Ceipal ATS often presents a more cost-effective …
As mentioned earlier more numbers of user are able to login at a single stretch, while login with their individual website we cant able to login more than 3 users, I had used Job diva during 2018-2020, But Ceipal ATS 10 times better that as per usage . When comparing Ceipal ATS …
Ceipal ATS is much preferable to other ATS software. For example, it helps us submit the candidate's profile to the client and schedule the candidate's interview. Ceipal ATS also helps us track the candidate in case the candidate has submitted a number of clients. Also, the …
We have used one more job boards platform of LinkedIn. That is used directly to connect the candidates only. We didn’t contact them directly, but the ceipal ATS has a candidate database (contact number, email ID, and resumes), so we can use that quickly to get the results that.
I heard that people use other ATS tools for sourcing the profiles and maintaining the some standards. I would strongly recommed them to use Ceipal ATS atleast once in their life, then definitely they will love it to go with Ceipal ATS. There is no other choice.
the only reason we use Ceipal ATS is that integration of various portals and easy user interface, its very useful for client submission and find out the duplicate resume and scheduling the interview. where other ATS where we don't get much user interface
Ceipal ATS systems seamlessly automate recruitment processes and allow hiring managers to source, shortlist, and select the right candidates. In other words, ATS is like an applicant data repository that can be used to automate workflows and maintain compliance all along the …
I like Ceipal ATS much better than Salesforce. I haven't used Salesforce in years, but I enjoy using Ceipal ATS much better. I think Ceipal ATS has the ability to outperform Salesforce.
We wanted to bring in the function of the manager interaction from our requirements as other ATS are kind of static and sometimes the updates are delayed. This down time would cost our speed to market since there was a clog with the updates. I want to say it stacks up fairly …
We already had a relationship with peoplefluent and were offered assistance through implementation and deployment. We couldn't walk away from our current vendor.
Out of the VMS's listed, I'd say PeopleFluent is solidly in the middle. Fieldglass and IQN are probably easier to navigate and more modern looking, and I definitely don't run into the login problems with them. Beeline and PRO Wand are probably on par with PeopleFluent. They …
PeopleFluent had an easier degree of use in screening and Talent Acquisition than others I have used. I would highly recommend PeopleFluent. It takes minimal training and can quickly get it up and running.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their …
I like the ease of Peoplefluent and I like how we can have questions for certain areas to screen candidates before considering to bring them in for an interview.
In my opinion Peoplefluent better fit our needs for flexibility and "total package". Peoplefluent's Compensation, Performance and Succession platforms work quite well with each other. Additionally the administrative features and requirements are easy to grasp and very flexible.
Features
Ceipal ATS
PeopleFluent
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Ceipal ATS
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
PeopleFluent
9.5
Ratings
28% above category average
Job Requisition Management
9.70 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
8.70 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
9.50 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
9.20 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Resume Management
9.40 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
7.40 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate Search
9.30 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
9.50 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Collaboration
8.80 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
9.20 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Email Templates
9.50 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
User Permissions
9.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.40 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Reporting
9.20 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Ceipal ATS
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
Ratings
9% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Ceipal ATS
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Ceipal ATS
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Ceipal ATS
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Moving to Ceipal ATS was the worst decision we made at the organization I work for. The data loss, lies sold to us from their team, the inability to send emails and text messages successfully, the reporting limitations, the career site limitations across industry and categories… all of it… is quite possibly the biggest Mistake we have made. This horrible platform quite possibly will sink the organization i work for.
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
Once we are able to utilize all the functionality in Ceipal ATS, we will be able to have a quick snapshot of each of our programs to see daily and future interviews, and other tasks.
The dashboard is easy to read. Again, once we can utilize all the functionality in Ceipal ATS, it will be super helpful to see a quick snapshot overview of my programs.
While creating a placement, the order in which country and zip code show makes no sense.
If we enter zip code first and then country, then the zip code vanishes, and if we want to fill country first we have to scroll down then scroll up for zip code
It automatically logs off a user, and they have to re-login again and again.
Often few users id gets deactivated automatically and as a admin I have to reactivate it again and again.
I would advise better filtering options when pulling up candidate profiles, we should have multiple functions when requesting candidates profile.
Sometimes I get huge projects and need to move more than 20 people, it's a headache moving groups in parts.
A faster way to verify if a candidate has been double submitted, maybe with a unique ID or email that identifies said candidate prior to going through the whole submission process.
Stronger cache cookies when session is timed out get kicked out and the process reboots. Sometimes recruiters are pulled in different directions while multitasking.
We have been using this ATS for the past few years and have never had any major problems. It is being used for candidate sourcing as well as keeping track of all our candidate's databases. In the market, there are very few ATS software available, and I think Ceipal is the best among all.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
One of the easiest interfaces among the other ATS is Ceipal ATS, which reduces manual effort due to the AI automation integration, which increases the productivity of high-volume tasks. The overall Ceipal ATS interface looks presentable or is easy to approach due to its automation tools.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
In my tenure of using this software, there were multiple times when I faced a technical outage, and it was not too long. We had it resolved as we connected with the support, and they informed us immediately that the developer team is working on it and will get the issue resolved.
I never faced any problem loading the Ceipal login page and when I had a problem it was just my browser. I rarely use any other browser other than Chrome. Even after integrating with other job portals, Ceipal never gets hung or there is any error loading page I have received.
I would rate myself a 5 out of 10 in coding. While I have a basic understanding of coding languages like Java and Python, I am still learning and honing my skills. However, I am eager to learn and willing to put in the effort to improve my coding abilities.
In my experience, the support team was very prompt and helpful. They had good subject matter expertise and were able to troubleshoot immediately. At times we wanted some enhancements but it was not possible due to product limitations. But, the support team was helpful in suggesting alternatives for our requirements. The customer support staff was also very polite and friendly.
A executive visit our organisation and check the compatibility of the systems and check the proper installation and navigation to the Ceipal. and take multiple sessions with the employees phase wise. also give some activity to perform and pull reports.
Every time one excutive do a session and clearly explains each tools and its benifits and use of it. Also they welcome questions and do due diligent and answer with a proper explanation. we use ticketing system for every traing sessions and use zoom meeting for effective training.
Clear Communication, core training, Data Migration, Customization and Configuration, Continuous Improvement. Regularly review and optimize your utilization of Ceipal ATS by collecting feedback from users, monitoring key performance metrics, and staying informed about new updates and features. Carefully plan and execute the data migration process to ensure that all existing candidate and recruitment data is accurately transferred to the new system.
I have not used any other ATS other than Ceipal ATS might be its so fortunate that I would not like use any other ATS in future. Its so addictive trust me with its enriched features, integration and customization are surely beneficial and I don't think any other ATS can match with it.
Out of the VMS's listed, I'd say PeopleFluent is solidly in the middle. Fieldglass and IQN are probably easier to navigate and more modern looking, and I definitely don't run into the login problems with them. Beeline and PRO Wand are probably on par with PeopleFluent. They have their plusses and minuses in terms of navigation and ease of use. Covendis is definitely worse than PeopleFluent. Covendis is a mess - very difficult to navigate, not intuitive at all with terrible workflow. Again, I didn't select PeopleFluent; my client did, and I have chosen to work with them, therefore I work with PeopleFluent.
I have given an 8 rating as the Ceipal is being used in our department for mostly recruitment purposes so we don't have many other departments. We use Ceipal for recruitment and for sales purposes. Currently, it's being used for the bother dept and working absolutely fine so I think an 8 rating is reasonable.
ATS software can help you create a positive candidate experience, simplify your recruitment process, and stand out to top talent.
We've made a significant number of placements, and our overall profitability has increased as a result. Ceipal helped us do that.
In recruitment, return on investment (ROI) measures the effectiveness and value of your organization's recruitment strategies and activities used to attract.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.