CGM Medisoft vs. Tebra Practice Marketing

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CGM Medisoft
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
CGM Medisoft is a practice management solution that helps users serve patients with personalized, compassionate care while keeping up a modern, successful practice. CGM MEDISOFT EHR offers an EHR designed to complement and simplify workflows. CGM MEDISOFT PM combines revenue cycle management to provide an all-in-one practice management bundle.N/A
Tebra Practice Marketing
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Tebra Practice Marketing (formerly Kareo Marketing, based on DoctorBase, company Kareo acquired in 2015) provides practice marketing and patient communication solutions for healthcare providers.
$0
Pricing
CGM MedisoftTebra Practice Marketing
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cub
$0
Professional
$300
Managed Services
$500
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CGM MedisoftTebra Practice Marketing
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CGM MedisoftTebra Practice Marketing
Considered Both Products
CGM Medisoft
Chose CGM Medisoft
Both Insync and MediTouch lacked in the customizable features. I was on the phone with support for Insync nearly every day trying to build out progress and procedure note templates. Their system was not intuitive at all - in fact, it was very confusing. MediTouch didn't have …
Chose CGM Medisoft
I prefer Medisoft due to ease of use, functionality and custom report features. In my experience with other software programs I found them to be either less user friendly or lacking in key features that we require for our particular practice.
Tebra Practice Marketing
Chose Tebra Practice Marketing
We were very satisfied with Demand Force but switched to Kareo because of the price. and it put all of our platforms with one company. I would say Demand Force was a better product, however, for the price, Kareo is a great option if the engineers could work the bugs out.
Best Alternatives
CGM MedisoftTebra Practice Marketing
Small Businesses
Tebra Billing & Payments
Tebra Billing & Payments
Score 7.0 out of 10
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CGM MedisoftTebra Practice Marketing
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CGM MedisoftTebra Practice Marketing
Likelihood to Recommend
Medisoft is very helpful when it comes to creating patients and setting them up in chart form. However, we have come across an issue where we have several duplicate charts for the same patient. I wish there was a way that Medisoft could warn the user if a patient has already been created. Also, similarly, I have several insurance companies that are duplicates. To the tune of 1500. It's a very difficult process to weed through them and select the appropriate insurance.
Read full review
The features Kareo marketing offers are great, however, they need to be worked on to make sure they are functioning correctly. It should not take over 3 months of working on the issue to still not have an answer or solution.
Read full review
Pros
  • Billing is outstanding.
  • Running patient reports is quick and easy.
  • Linking to office hours never has issues.
Read full review
  • Patient communications: being able to send patients text messages has been a great benefit.
  • Kareo sends out appointment reminders for us which saves our employees time.
Read full review
Cons
  • I would like to see an option that allows the user to mark a claim as "crossed over to secondary" when posting primary payments. Ideally there would be a button or box to tick, which would then mark the claim as crossed over and also mark the secondary claim as sent. This process must currently be done manually and can be quite tedious and time consuming. If we do not go through and mark these crossed over claims as sent before sending a batch of secondary claims, we typically end up with quite a few "duplicate claim" rejections.
  • I would like to be able to tie one guarantor account to multiple patient accounts and have a listing of those patient accounts pop up (or otherwise be visible) whenever the guarantor account is accessed. This can be a frustrating issue when you have 2 or more children from the same family as patients and need to be able to assign the same guarantor for each. While it is currently possible to assign the same guarantor to more than one account, the system fails to pull information from each account when printing statements, resulting in incorrect balances being reported on guarantor driven statements.
  • I would like to have a print option available for more areas within Medisoft. For instance, I would love to be able to print the list of "ready to bill" claims directly from the Claim Management screen. It would also be quite useful to be able to print the transaction notes associated with individual claims.
Read full review
  • There are currently some issues with the survey feature that we have not been able to open, view, or publish the survey. This has been going on for 3 months and there has been no resolution.
  • It would be nice to be able to filter who is receiving a survey so patients do not get them every time they have a visit.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Other than speaking with someone about the issues we have had, I don't believe that anyone is actually working on a fix for our problem. If I can not open, view, and publish surveys when we receive them then part of the software is not working. They don't mind charging me every month for a service that is not functioning correctly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I prefer Medisoft due to ease of use, functionality and custom report features. In my experience with other software programs I found them to be either less user friendly or lacking in key features that we require for our particular practice.
Read full review
We were very satisfied with Demand Force but switched to Kareo because of the price. and it put all of our platforms with one company. I would say Demand Force was a better product, however, for the price, Kareo is a great option if the engineers could work the bugs out.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Medisoft is a good product, but I feel the cost of assurance is too high.
  • With all the different components each being billed separately adds up quickly.
  • Keeping patient charts/bills up to date is pretty easy.
Read full review
  • We have not been using it long enough to know an answer to this.
Read full review
ScreenShots