ChartHop vs. Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ChartHop
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
ChartHop, from the company of the same name in New York, is an organization management platform, providing org chart that integrates with HRIS systems, workforce analytics with custom reporting, and tools to support people and succession planning, compensation plans, and process performance reviews and data.
$0
per month per seat
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
The PI Behavioral Assessment™ is a simple yet effective assessment that is broken down into four primary behavioral factors, or core drives. These core drives and their relation to each other create a behavioral pattern that provides a framework for understanding the workplace behaviors of candidates and employees. According to the vendor, the results allow users to better predict workplace behaviors and motivating needs. The PI Behavioral Assessment™ is a…N/A
Pricing
ChartHopPredictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Editions & Modules
ChartHop Basic
$0
per month per seat
ChartHop Modules
Contact us
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ChartHopPredictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ChartHopPredictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Considered Both Products
ChartHop
Chose ChartHop
ChartHop is generally better than these products because of its usability and clarity of documentation. Our use cases can be very specific sometimes, so for example ChartHop is intuitively better for org charts and smaller organizational visualizations. There is also more …
Chose ChartHop
Never used other products apart from ChartHop.
Chose ChartHop
This is a whole new ball game with Charthop, there was not the options we have on charthop on adp
Chose ChartHop
I used to work at Oracle, and there we used one of our own applications called ARIA. It was fairly easy to use so I liked it.
Chose ChartHop
In the past my company used Namely. I prefer ChartHop's visibility into org structure, but I feel it's missing some tools. I liked the way that most things lived under namely from tax documents to pay stubs to more.
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Other assessments provide more than two questions [in] order to determine our candidate's skills. I do believe [some] variety might help Predictive Index Behaviour Assessment determine more accurate results since candidates would have to answer more questions about their …
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
In my years as an HR admin, I have not tried any other programs like this one.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Many years ago, I utilized Personalysis and it tended to put people into one of 4 main color groups. It also helped with knowing how to communicate with others. I like PI because there are so many Behavioral Profiles.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
I have used MBTI, Strengthsfinder, Disc, Kolbe among others. I find they all have their place. PI was already in use at my company when I joined. However, as I became certified and used it more, I have found it very effective. The reports have just the right amount of …
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
PI is way better - the Wonderlic is very limited in what information it can provide you with a candidate.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
PI is a much simpler profile to manage and is clearly about behavior instead of personality.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
I have only used PI. We assessed Culture Index recently to see if there were additional factors that would be helpful, however found it to be poorly worded and with significantly fewer resources for education, training and overall use.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
[We selected PI Behavioral Assessment because we] Can tailor it to positions. Provides clear data.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
PI is simple to use, in a short time scale but provides startling insight into the individual.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
The only other type of Behavioral Assessment I've used is the Strengths Finder and I don't know that I'd say it's anything like PI. It still gives us great information about a persons strengths but PI tells us more about a persons motivations.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
DISC is similar but really only focuses on the employee in a business setting. The PI Behavioral Assessment looks at the employee as a person as well as an employee. It is not how you respond to a question but what attributes you have.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
I haven't used any other assessments in the past, so I don't have anything to compare to...unfortunately. I think the PI is probably the strongest assessment out there, and most accurate. It's used worldwide, and has scientific backing to prove its validity. If I were to …
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
The other assessments that we examined felt more like an SAT exam than a recruitment tool. The results were difficult for our managers to read through and understand. There were a lot of words, with very little actually being said. The PI was succinct and precise.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
From 2011-2016 we used DiSC and PI Behavioral Assessment together. We found DiSC to be more employee friendly, meaning employees don't need to be trainined administrators to understand their own report. However, our DiSC trained employee has left, and we opted to stick with …
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
We haven't used any other assessments to compare against it. We've been in love with PI since we started.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
We also use a Bartell Assessment for managers.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
We use multiple assessments for a variety of reasons. This one is the most versatile that we have. Others we use either for individual development or team development, but PI is the only one we use for Recruiting, individual development and team development.
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
We evaluated a number of alternatives. Most of them were cost prohibitive because they wanted to charge us per survey. We have a very seasonal workforce so that cost model was not going to work for us. With PI we have a fixed cost each year. Easy to budget... no guessing or …
Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Most of the other assessments in the marketplace are lengthy and complicated. The PI Behavioral Assessment is so user-friendly that many job applicants have told me they prefer it over other assessments they have taken. The other great thing about the PI assessment is that it …
Features
ChartHopPredictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Workforce Analytics
Comparison of Workforce Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
8.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
8.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Automated data collection9.20 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Data analysis9.00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Data integration8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Predictive analytics6.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benchmarking7.10 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Report designer9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Pre-built content10.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Data management8.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Self-service insights8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ChartHopPredictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Small Businesses
Rippling
Rippling
Score 8.9 out of 10
Rippling
Rippling
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 6.3 out of 10
Rippling
Rippling
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 6.3 out of 10
SAP Workforce Analytics
SAP Workforce Analytics
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ChartHopPredictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ChartHopPredictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Likelihood to Recommend
Not Suited - The tool is suited for organizations with an employee count of more than >500. There are much cheaper tools out there for a company size of below 500 employees. Integration with other tools can be improved. Suited - From an admin POV who sometimes works closely with HRs, customization and storing information is great.
Read full review
Predictive Index has served us well so far in helping determine key personality traits of salespeople we hire. How will they sell? Is sales a good fit for them? We have not expanded to use it with other teams/depts yet. We primarily use the behavioral assessment (not cognitive).
Read full review
Pros
  • The org chart is very easy to use
  • It can be integrated into other things like internal company websites
  • The UI looks nice
Read full review
  • Create job targets using behaviors which would enable someone to be successful.
  • Helps recruit the right fit by asking the right questions.
  • Helps increase communication across an organization within teams and across departments.
  • Helps provide managers with support on how to best communicate and help develop their direct reports.
Read full review
Cons
  • It took us a lot of time to implement and onboard this tool. Though we love the tool now, the onboarding could have been smoother.
  • UI looks outdated, room for improvement. Difficult to navigate.
Read full review
  • In Beta -> Hire -> New Candidates - > I would like to see the ability to create 1 or 2 additional "Type" folders that can be customized for my company. By being able to do this, I can more efficiently manage my potential candidates, rather that every time I go to review a position, having to make these individual selections each time. I would like the favorite icon and the pass icon to remain; however find it extraneous to have to sort through these candidates each time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We have plans to expand this to our entire organization in the US as well as our affiliates in Germany, France and the UK.
Read full review
Usability
For teams and people who have enough time to learn the platform or enough patience to read through documentation or to watch through tutorials, the platform is pretty usable and it is relatively easy to pick up new concepts and how to do certain things, specifically around self-service if there is some problem. With that being said, the platform can sometimes be inherently unintuitive with certain edge cases
Read full review
Very easy to use for both administrators and those taking the assessment. This tool is really a game-changer for staffing, onboarding, and retention. It is like having a crystal ball sometimes with insights into the behaviors of job candidates and is critical for finding the right person for the right role.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The Customer Success team has been quite helpful during the times that I've interreacted with them. I've also found support and implementation to be responsive with any questions related to the initial set up phase or for on going support. Overall we've been pleased with the support offered by Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ChartHop is generally better than these products because of its usability and clarity of documentation. Our use cases can be very specific sometimes, so for example ChartHop is intuitively better for org charts and smaller organizational visualizations. There is also more support for workflow creations. There is special attention to making sure there are not too many functions and things that can confuse the user compared to the other products.
Read full review
The other assessments that we examined felt more like an SAT exam than a recruitment tool. The results were difficult for our managers to read through and understand. There were a lot of words, with very little actually being said. The PI was succinct and precise.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • This relationship is not as clear
  • When comparing this service to others, it may simply be a matter of preference
  • This visualization platform is only a way to enables ideas that will increase things like ROI. I don't see it as something that impacts revenue.
Read full review
  • The PI has been very helpful when analyzing employees. You cannot go wrong when you are able to see a candidate or employees work style.
  • The ROI is very positive. A lot of companies have a specific culture that they are trying to create or adhere to. This software helps you see if an employee would be a good fit for your company or not.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ChartHop Screenshots

Screenshot of Rich employee profiles: Used to drive connections across the employee base while humanizing people dataScreenshot of Visualizations: Familiar formats like org charts, graphs, and maps enable anyone to understand the data.Screenshot of Consolidated data: Data is accessed in one place through ChartHop’s integrations with existing HR systems, including HRIS, compensation, equity, engagement, and performance.Screenshot of Flexible reporting: Data can be sliced and diced across any dimension, through custom configurations or by using out-of-the-box options

Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment Screenshots

Screenshot of Control and analyze assessments within your organization.Screenshot of