Cisco Firepower 4100 Series vs. Netskope Cloud Firewall

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco Firepower 4100 Series’ 1-rack-unit size is presented by the vendodr as ideal at the Internet edge and in high-performance environments. They further state that it shows what’s happening on your network, detects attacks earlier so you can act faster, and reduces management complexity.N/A
Netskope Cloud Firewall
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Cloud Firewall delivers Firewall as a Service (FWaaS) for egress traffic from a SASE architecture. Users and offices connect to NewEdge, the company's security private cloud, for firewall protection. The Cloud Firewall helps organizations to improve their security posture, while aiming to reduce operational costs compared to traditional hardware appliances.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesNetskope Cloud Firewall
Editions & Modules
Firepower 4100
50,000-250,000
per appliance
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesNetskope Cloud Firewall
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesNetskope Cloud Firewall
Considered Both Products
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
Chose Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
We switch to Palo Alto due the amount of tickets open with Cisco Firepower 4100 Series. It was taking a great amount of time for our engineers to fix problems. But it was a great tool when it was working as we were expecting. The fact it has a lot of instability on the releases …
Chose Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
We previously use Cisco ASA 5500 series but due to those devices are a little old, we changed to Cisco Firepower 4100 Series as more recent product from Cisco. One of the reasons to select Cisco Firepower 4100 Series was the configuration migration availability from ASA to …
Chose Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
As I mentioned before, the Fortigates have better failover. I think the Cisco interface is easier to use that that of the Fortigate. My only criticism would be that with multiple CLIs, it can get a bit confusing when you are trying to configure something or troubleshoot from …
Chose Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series deployment is straightforward and easy to implement. It is also can support high availability and able to achieve redundancy. Besides, firmware upgrade is quite simple and the process does not take much effort as the upgrade will be automatically …
Netskope Cloud Firewall

No answer on this topic

Features
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesNetskope Cloud Firewall
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
8.6
Ratings
0% below category average
Netskope Cloud Firewall
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proxy Server5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesNetskope Cloud Firewall
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.9 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 10.0 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesNetskope Cloud Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesNetskope Cloud Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
When we are asked by local partners which security equipment we use we always recommend our Cisco security products. The Firepower firewall is no exception and we can easily recommend this to others who need a fast, secure, and well built system that integrates well with all your existing hardware and software.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Policy management in the GUI. I'm old-school, and still create ACLs in the CLI, but using the GUI for this is very nice.
  • Event monitoring and reporting is great, and you can get very granular when it comes to what information you are viewing.
  • I really like the troubleshooting features that are built in, especially the packet tracer and the ability to generate and download a troubleshooting package to review or send to TAC.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • When deployed as Firepower Threat Defense, configurations cannot be made within the device itself.
  • Troubleshooting can be difficult if the Cisco Firepower 4100 Series firewall is managed by the Cisco Firepower Management Center.
  • There are two operating systems in Cisco Firepower 4100 Series, firmware upgrade process will take a long time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It not easy to understand the different features it offers. Sometimes you need to spend a couple of minutes to implement a change or even open a ticket with cisco tac to figure it out. Once support is on the phone with you they know how to resolve problems. But it's not an intuitive tool
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We switch to Palo Alto due the amount of tickets open with Cisco Firepower 4100 Series. It was taking a great amount of time for our engineers to fix problems. But it was a great tool when it was working as we were expecting. The fact it has a lot of instability on the releases was the deciding factor.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Quickly respond to incidents using vpn remote access
  • VPN L2L used to establish connections with global providers
  • Up to 2000+ vpn access without having performance issues
  • Granular access with policy groups based on the AD user
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots