Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued) vs. RingCentral Video

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Meeting Server was a conferencing solution for allowing the user to setup a conference any time using a wide range of Cisco and Jabber devices, and third-party solutions (e.g. Skype for Business). The product has reached its end-of-life, and is discontinued.N/A
RingCentral Video
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
RingCentral Video is a video conferencing solution ideal for remote teams and businesses. It includes screen sharing, group messaging, HD quality voice and video, and one-click video meetings.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)RingCentral Video
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)RingCentral Video
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)RingCentral Video
Considered Both Products
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
Chose Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
Apart from Cisco Meeting Server, only Poly offers full fledged on-premise meeting server. Their solution is called Polycom RealPresence Collaboration Server. But there solutions are mostly outdated. Even though they have recently changes to subscription via Poly Clarity but …
Chose Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
I would say Cisco Meeting Server has some ways to go before coming 1st compared to Microsoft teams which is widely popular. Compared to other meeting servers, though, they are definitely better in the sense that they provide superior video quality, and integrate well with other …
Chose Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
In the ecosystem of Microsoft-based operating systems and Microsoft Office products, the Microsoft team always proved better in many ways. Features like meeting details downloaded in an excel form, recording, and sharing content easily helped a great deal in day-to-day work …
Chose Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
I have only used Cisco.
Chose Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
Very similar tools and they all offer similar video/ conferencing experiences. Now Zoom has more applications connected, but I still feel Cisco is more stable when it comes to image quality with poor internet quality. GoTo Meeting has a bit better design, in my opinion, but we …
Chose Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
Compared to other programs I used, Cisco Meeting Server is in the middle field, I personally like Microsoft Teams more in terms of UE but for example Zoom, I find worse than Cisco Meeting Server and Skype is on the same level as Cisco Meeting Server. This is just my personal …
RingCentral Video
Chose RingCentral Video
RingCentral is easier to use and more reliable than Google Meet (or any of the other various competitors like Webex, Zoom, or Microsoft Teams.) I much prefer to use RingCentral as it has been easy to connect with clients and I have received very little to no negative feedback …
Chose RingCentral Video
RingCentral Video works basically as well as Google, Skype, and Zoom, however, those apps are more well known and much more industry standards. That is why we prefer them however we do use RingCentral as the backup and for some clients who prefer it for one reason or another. …
Chose RingCentral Video
RingCentral Video is 100 times better that is why we don't use BlueJeans Meetings any more.
Chose RingCentral Video
RingCentral Video has nearly all the functionality of the more established commercial products but comes at a lower price point. This is incredibly important for smaller businesses and non-profit entities.
Chose RingCentral Video
Quality-wise, RingCentral Video, functionality differs a little, but who really cares as long as it is easy to use and not crashing all the time. The service and support [are] fine [and] the functionality is fine as well. There aren't a whole look of things to really compare …
Chose RingCentral Video
RingCentral Video is lightweight and perfect for video meetings, however we did not select RingCentral Video because it did not have advanced teams functions for dynamic participants (project team members)
Chose RingCentral Video
RingCentral was selected by our client because of the ease to be used; I would compare it with Webex in reliability and user-friendliness. Not the same for Google Meet, even when this one is free to use, the tools at your disposal and the UI are surpassed in quality by …
Chose RingCentral Video
We selected RingCentral for calling and we got RingCentral Video as part of the bundle. We thought we could reduce costs by using RingCentral for both calling and meetings. However, RingCentral Video is simply not a mature platform for meetings. Other options are better, which …
Chose RingCentral Video
Microsoft Teams and Zoom Rooms
Chose RingCentral Video
Better price points ; ease of use. Direct communication with the vendor was a plus.
Features
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)RingCentral Video
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
RingCentral Video
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
High quality audio8.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
High quality video8.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support7.10 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
7.4
Ratings
7% below category average
RingCentral Video
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Desktop sharing8.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Whiteboards6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
7.4
Ratings
11% below category average
RingCentral Video
8.0
Ratings
4% below category average
Calendar integration7.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with social media5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events6.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Slideshows8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
7.5
Ratings
9% below category average
RingCentral Video
-
Ratings
Live chat7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience polling7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
RingCentral Video
-
Ratings
User authentication8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)RingCentral Video
Small Businesses
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 10.0 out of 10
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)RingCentral Video
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Meeting Server (discontinued)RingCentral Video
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco meeting Server can be used to host meeting for a small group 2 people and also can host meeting for hundreds of people. Even if the scalability increases no compromise in the call and consistent performance can be observed. The video quality is clear and there is no noticeable latency between audio and video. The recording feature is well placed and it helps a lot in rectifying and processing the important points that might have been left out during the meeting.
Read full review
I've never had any technical difficulties while participating on a RingCentral Video meeting. One thing that was cumbersome was when they migrated from RingCentral Meetings to RingCentral Video, it was a bit labor intensive to migrate existing meetings, so that could have been easier.
Read full review
Pros
  • Picture and sound quality are excellent.
  • Connection is strong and reliable.
  • It allows people at home to feel apart of the meeting on site.
Read full review
  • One click solution to conduct video calls and conferences.
  • Intuitive UI and great app to view call recordings, run reports and analyse call data.
  • Easy to set up and adopt quickly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Add some of the features which are currently only accessible by API, this will reduce intervention of support team and downtime.
  • Bring some features to foreground. Some users find it difficult to navigate to certain buttons which are embedded in menus.
  • Allow easy access to some of the controls.
Read full review
  • Only a rudimentary add-in for Outlook if using on-prem Exchange
  • Bugs in screen sharing that include an "application was minimized" error and the inability to share audio from a pre-recorded video
  • No simple way to join a RingCentral Video from the phone app without typing in the exact meeting ID, which can be tedious.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
because we're satisfied of the product
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
very easy to use and quick to learn
Read full review
Easy to use once it has been set up and onboarded with your company. Once you learn how to use all of the various features and dial out to other countries, it is a great product and in my opinion, superior to some of its competitors on the market currently.
Read full review
Support Rating
I never used Support
Read full review
Did not require support
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apart from Cisco Meeting Server, only Poly offers full fledged on-premise meeting server. Their solution is called Polycom RealPresence
Collaboration Server. But there solutions are mostly outdated. Even though they have recently changes to subscription via Poly Clarity but servers are still very old. Whereas Cisco Meeting Server was recently updated and integrates well with WebEx and Cisco's other products.
Read full review
We selected RingCentral for calling and we got RingCentral Video as part of the bundle. We thought we could reduce costs by using RingCentral for both calling and meetings. However, RingCentral Video is simply not a mature platform for meetings. Other options are better, which makes RingCentral calling a less attractive option.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Definitely cost effective if you use most of the services and are a partner
  • They are very supportive with any issues the business faces and offers great solutions
  • I would like to see a more user-friendly website
Read full review
  • It helps us create a better picture of the goals and updates that we need to do to our everyday activities, not relying on emails that may or may not be clear.
  • It's easy for everyone to join and we can coach in a more personal way.
Read full review
ScreenShots