TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Citrix DaaS vs. Omnissa Horizon

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Citrix DaaS

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/ACitrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, or XenDesktop) is a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and application virtualization solution from Citrix.

    $375

    Omnissa Horizon

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AA VDI solution used for the secure delivery of virtual desktops and apps from on-premises to the cloud. It is used to deploy, manage, monitor and scale desktops and apps across private, hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructure using a cloud-based console and SaaS management services.

    $4.67

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Citrix DaaSOmnissa Horizon
    Editions & Modules
    Virtual Apps
    $375
    Horizon Apps Standard
    $4.67
    per month per user
    Horizon Standard Plus
    $5.79
    per month per user
    Horizon Apps Universal
    $6.00
    per month per user
    Horizon Enterprise Plus
    $10.71
    per month per user
    Horizon Universal
    $12.50
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Citrix DaaSOmnissa Horizon
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Citrix DaaSOmnissa Horizon
    Considered Both Products
    Citrix
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops was our pick because of the low infrastructure requirements. With Vmware, you need compatible hardware to run ESXi and then a machine to run the vCenter Server and free other machines to run horizon view, app, policies, etc which can get …
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops (CVAD) allows for the use of any hypervisor or cloud platform which ensures flexibility in decisions that are made across a IT organization while others are typically tied to a single or highly controlled cloud selection. Additionally the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    Our company is focused and trained for the use of Citrix. We're still in the process of exploring the other options.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    Other products were more cost efficient, offered a better support contract, were much simpler to configure, and had better documentation.

    We chose Citrix over the alternatives, because one of our customers required the use of Citrix for the connection of third-party vendors.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    We needed our application vendor to support our solution and Citrix was their main choice. The other choice was Microsoft RDS/RDP but we wanted the higher management functionality that Citrix brought.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    XenDesktop is the best because Citrix says so! But really it depends on a lot of factors that vary from one organization to the next that require detailed analysis with a trusted consulting partner or an in-house EUC architect.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    XenDesktop is much faster to provision and to update machines. XenDesktop also has a much more robust suite of profile management and user controls.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    XenDesktop is a much more mature product. Better suite of products to support various workflows.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    We briefly looked at VMware Horizon View and its integration into our current VMware environment, but experience with XenDesktop and common usage overcame any potential savings with Horizon View.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    Lot of functionality of features are missing in VMware Horizon View. They are still in catch up mode when it comes to improving the user experience.
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    XenDesktop includes features above and beyond the competition, and you really do get what you pay for. Provisioning Services makes single image management an absolute dream. Anyone who has ever had to recompose 100+ desktops in View knows the pain of waiting for composer to do …
    Incentivized
    Chose Citrix DaaS
    Citrix Virtual Apps & Desktops is platform agnostic (we can use any underlying hypervisor technology) and really flexible for any use case. Using a golden image and provisioning it (with Machine Creation Services or Provisioning Services) is powerful and really straightforward, …
    Incentivized
    Omnissa
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    Far more cost effective.
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    At least in our company, Citrix only worked allied with a physical authentication token, which was a Smart Card written and provided by the company. The software randomly froze and came back as nothing ever happened and the Citrix support couldn't care less about this. We grew …
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    Citrix vid setup was very difficult and initially hard to set up. I believe this has changed somewhat now, but there are still multiple servers that need to be set up before it can be used. Vmware VDI was fairly easy to set up and was immediately working and up and running, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    Some of the platforms are designed for smaller or standalone environments and do not allow for large-scale centrally controlled deployments. in the case of Citrix, there was better Chrome OS support but the lack of PCoIP UDP optimizations made is slower and less desirable by …
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    I suppose I'm prejudiced but I don't think either of those products is in the same league. I know XenDesktop has made some strides I just think VMware has the superior product.
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    When we were considering a VDI solution, I reviewed Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop as alternative solutions to Horizon View. It seemed like Horizon View was a more mature solution and had the best integration to our existing Vmware vSphere environment. The systems …
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    Citrix XenDesktop is another big player in the VDI market, but the product simply isn't as mature or powerful as Horizon. Xen still struggles with Windows 10, whereas Horizon has accomodated every OS we throw at it with ease. XenDesktop is a great product overall, performance …
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon

    Did not do a full evaluation on Citrix XenDesktop as VMware Horizon View integrates nicely with the VMware vSphere environment that we had currently set up.

    We were using PanoLogic for about 6 months before we scrapped it and moved onto VMware Horizon View. Horizon View gave us …

    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    We did not deploy in-house testing, though we did review another company's deployment. At the time we liked what we saw in Horizon, though I have no doubts that XenDesktop could deliver just as well and still does for the other company that presented it to us. What tipped the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Omnissa Horizon
    XenDesktop is a good product and has its advantages. It comes down to where you want the processing to take place (the server in the data center or the client endpoint). Regarding cost, the infrastructure needed to deploy the Citrix solution is more expensive than VMware's …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Citrix DaaSOmnissa Horizon
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (55 ratings)
    4.3
    (37 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    5.0
    (5 ratings)
    Availability
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    7.4
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.9
    (8 ratings)
    1.0
    (11 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.3
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    2.4
    (4 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    5.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)