Claris FileMaker vs. Creatio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Claris FileMaker
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Claris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.
$21
per month per user
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Creatio is a provider of a no-code platform to automate industry workflows. The Creatio offering includes a no-code platform (Studio Creatio), along with CRM applications for Marketing, Sales, and Service, industry workflows for 20 verticals and marketplace add-ons. Marketing Creatio - a ready-to-use platform to automate marketing campaigns and lead management workflows with no-code and maximum degree of freedom. Sales Creatio - an end-to-end…
$25
per month per user
Pricing
Claris FileMakerCreatio
Editions & Modules
Platform Subscription
$21
per month per user
Individual desktop license
$594
one-time fee
Growth
$25
per month per user
Enterprise
$55
per month per user
Unlimited
$85
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Claris FileMakerCreatio
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCreatio Sales, Creatio Marketing, and Creatio Service are available as add-ons for $15 per month, per user. Creatio AI is included in every tier of the Creatio platform (Growth, Enterprise, and Unlimited). Additional AI Tokens are available for $150 per pack. 5 user minimum.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Claris FileMakerCreatio
Considered Both Products
Claris FileMaker
Chose Claris FileMaker
The Claris FileMaker "toolbox" is more robust and comprehensive than any competitive product. The free or low-cost web apps often lead to a "dead-end" that is never the case with Claris FileMaker.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker looks more legit and not as likely to mess up formulas and such.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Access is very complex leading to longer deployment, more user training, and therefore higher costs. Caspio is decent but quite limited in its native ability.
Chose Claris FileMaker
I've used Microsoft Access, and it doesn't compare to Filemaker. The Filemaker software system is robust and had the ability to expand and work with other programs. I have a small business, and I can say that for a small to medium sized business, I do not think there is a …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Easy to get started and Includes starter solutions for every situation by Anyone with access can edit the program by using many plugins available to extend functionality such as Changing field/database/script names after the fact is free specially For the most part, drag and …
Chose Claris FileMaker
SmartSheets
Google Suite
Mendix
Chose Claris FileMaker
Claris just takes everything to the next level - there's nothing we've thrown at it that it can't do
Chose Claris FileMaker
FileMaker Pro is the chaotic, cumbersome and non-integratable little sibling of MS Access. And even MS Access can't be taken serious in a medium sized company. FileMaker Pro can not even be compared to serious products like OutSystems and Sitecore. It's also not free... whereas …
Chose Claris FileMaker
20 years ago we had to choose between Microsoft Access and Claris FileMaker Pro. We chose FileMaker Pro because it was easier to use. As our systems have evolved around FileMaker Pro we haven't looked at any competitors as we're too far along to start over again with a new …
Chose Claris FileMaker
The only other program I have used that has any type of similar functionality is ADP Workforce Now. I would prefer ADP Workforce Now overall because it is more user-friendly and can also accept tons of data, run reports, and more. However, FileMaker Pro has functionalities …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Quick Base is internet-based and easily programmable by the end-user. Because of that, it is not as customizable as FileMaker. We had very specific purposes that were more easily accomplished in FileMaker (eg. Auto-calculating fields were more fool proof-ly accomplished in …
Chose Claris FileMaker
We previously had deployed QuickBase. However, we realized that QuickBase would not allow us to construct our app the way we worked. That is where FMP came in. Its ability to adapt to the way we work made transitioning very easy.
Chose Claris FileMaker
I haven't used another product like FileMaker Pro. Previously (at other jobs), I would email my needs to our maintenance and catering staff.
Chose Claris FileMaker
We've been working with Filemaker Pro since I started here so I didn't have much a choice, but based on my past experience dealing with custom databases, it's the easiest, most user-friendly program I've ever worked on. It provides exactly what you need, when you need it, in …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Unlike traditional databases, you get an all inclusive solution which allows end-user screens and workflows which can be developed via scripting. With the exception of SQL Server, Filemaker also allows you to setup scheduled scripts which can run on a recurring basis. In …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Zoho Sales, CRM etc as well as Salesforce.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Since we had implemented FileMaker Pro early on with the company, I have not used any other database software on a regular basis. Some others have used Zoho Creator with success, but since the cross-platform and program functionality of FileMaker is well established we have …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I am now using WorkEtc for my CRM, and there are more benefits to me and my business using this software than using FileMaker Pro.
WORK Etc Benefits: CloudBase, App, Email Response Update Project Automatically, Invoicing, Reports, Tags, Some quick add features
Work Etc. Cons: …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I chose FileMaker over a custom DB with Azure and SQL Server because of the low code nature of FileMaker. And we needed ease of access with Apple products so we didn't use Microsoft Access.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Some developers really like Visual FoxPro - but it has been discontinued by Microsoft and is no longer supported.

FileMaker offers improved developer productivity.
Chose Claris FileMaker
We were already using FileMaker. When we get to the point of needing to scale or rebuild, we are likely to move to AWS but keep FileMaker for prototyping.
Chose Claris FileMaker
The most direct competitor to FileMaker Pro is Microsoft Access. If you understand the way Microsoft Access works, then you can probably get more functionality and features in Microsoft Access. With that said though, FileMaker is much easier to learn and develop in. I tried …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I find now that I can't use Excel. It drives me nuts. For me it is now just a method for importing data and a method for exporting data that Excel users want to see.
Creatio
Chose Creatio
Salesforce CMS, ClientTrack by Eccovia, CaseWorthy and Penelope
Chose Creatio
Creatio was both more affordable and easier to customize than Salesforce, if slightly less robust, and represented an easy decision when we made the switch.
Chose Creatio
We previously used Salesforce as our CRM. While it has great functionality, we found it to be cost prohibitive to always require consultants to configure and update as our business needs or processes changed. No other platform reviewed ticked as many boxes as we needed in its …
Chose Creatio
Creatio is miles ahead of Infor - now, looking back on Infor, it seems very dated and restricted. I love how you can work things out and change things yourself in Creatio. And if things are a bit more complicated, you have your dedicated team person to help you. We have …
Chose Creatio
Although we haven't totally removed Oracle CX Sales, it's less effective due to its outdated sales marketing capabilities unlike Creatio, which offers robust tools at a lower cost.
Chose Creatio
Sure, the low code approach is eating the world and [is] a powerful feature in this CRM. But training time and time for implementation could be much [longer] than expected.
Chose Creatio
We selected Creatio because it's the most optimal system for our current business requirements and their further scale [development]. Also, we valued the support of the vendor and the big community of implement teams.
Chose Creatio
One-stop-shop for your sales and service needs
Chose Creatio
[Creatio is] more flexible and much more economical.
Chose Creatio
Creatio provides powerful features at an affordable cost. It is easy to customize and set up. The user interface is intuitive. It is possible to set up business rules with an easy interface without writing code. The basic setup can be performed by a business user, without …
Chose Creatio
I had used this as an intern, didn't work much on it.
Chose Creatio
Creatio is much faster and more configurable than Salesforce. The first thing that I noticed when migrating from Salesforce to Creatio was how few clicks it took to record activity or create a new task. Similarly, the page loading speed is so much faster which saves me hours …
Chose Creatio
We selected Creatio to replace Hubspot because it was a better fit for our objectives.
Chose Creatio
For this customer, I've been choosing among AmoCRM, Insightly, Bitrix24, Zoho Bigin (and CRM) and many others. The choice of Creatio was predicted mostly by the fact, that the company was using Terrasoft CRM previously. So it was a safe decision and choice to have the same …
Chose Creatio
The system’s UI, rich functionality, and a great potential for scalability made the system stand out among other vendors. It is a fully-fledged solution that allowed us to work with customer data way more efficiently and improve our processes on a regular basis.
Chose Creatio
The user-friendliness of Creatio was a big selling point along with the low-code initiatives, both of which were important to our business. With Salesforce, unlimited wasn't really unlimited. You couldn't deploy an on-site instance and the overall cost of the system far …
Chose Creatio
Creatio stood out from other vendors in terms of both the system’s usability and robustness. We were impressed by the flexibility of customization that the system provides. On top of that, Creatio’s technical support is always very quick to respond and helpful.
Features
Claris FileMakerCreatio
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Creatio
8.9
Ratings
5% above category average
Visual Modeling7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.50 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Platform User Management8.70 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Reusability9.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.30 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Claris FileMakerCreatio
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
AppSheet
AppSheet
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Claris FileMakerCreatio
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Claris FileMakerCreatio
Likelihood to Recommend
I think FileMaker [Pro] is a great solution for a small business wanting to take the next step from managing data with Excel spreadsheets to actually using a database. It is very intuitive to use and manage. A tech-savvy user can learn to use FileMaker [Pro] very easily without advanced skills as a developer.
Read full review
Creatio is well suited in following scenarios: Complex Business process modelling and automation, Low code No code development which is best for efficient timelines, customized reporting and dashboarding, seamless integration with other technologies. Scenarios where Creatio is less appropriate: Solutions which require high cutomizations on the frontend side as this can be done by javascript modifications but it increases the load on the page and slows it down.
Read full review
Pros
  • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
  • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
  • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
  • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
Read full review
  • Creatio's client success team is super. The team is collaborative, solution-oriented, and client-driven. We have weekly meetings with the team. They show up prepared with solutions/ideas to business requests and they are clearly engaged.
  • Creatio's infrastructure team has been critical to our ability to execute our cloud strategy. They have worked with us to set up our testing and production environments within Azure, assisted in testing, and are responsive and flexible to our unique requirements.
  • Creatio has been very flexible to requests for customization. We have taken their low-code out-of-the-box solution and "Ringlerized" it. The benefit for us is an application that meets our niche business needs.
Read full review
Cons
  • I had some big complaints about how to edit calculations and scripts, and not being able to print/export PDF from server but with the last 2 versions I can't complain any more. Those got added.
  • Syncing records between iOS and Filemaker Server still requires a developer to accomplish. Although I make money doing it for others I wish there was some "central" method of syncing that everyone can follow.
Read full review
  • When we started using Creatio in 2022 the new user interface had just been released and did not include all the features we needed; however, we used a more classic user interface and were still satisfied with the results.
  • The ability to capture a digital signature directly within the application was missing in the base system; however, Creatio connected us with a partner that provided a solution for this specific situation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
Read full review
We have always used a CRM and Creatio has proven to be much more effective in meeting our needs than our previous provider. Its customizability will allow us to adapt this product as our business may change in the future.
Read full review
Usability
It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
Read full review
It's very user friendly, at least to me ;-) No downtime, quick with updates, lot's op possibilities and options to explore and work with. I also realy like to use the Creatio Academy, it's a bit much but in this case less is more is the opposite: the more the better
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
Read full review
Other than the daily maintenance window where the server may be inaccessible for a few minutes, there have been no issues with accessing our Creatio site. The daily maintenance window is outside normal business hours so it does not affect our Users - just myself when I am looking to implement changes.
Read full review
Performance
for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
Read full review
Some Users have reported slow responses from the server at times which seems to be localized. Users are based across four different time zones and the issue is intermittent.
Read full review
Support Rating
The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
Creatio support is generally very responsive and often responds much faster than the expected SLAs. We have very rarely had "blocking" problems when creating new applications or features, and in all cases, Creatio has been able to help us or direct us to a solution. Overall, we are very satisfied with their support.
Read full review
In-Person Training
easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Most of the roadblocks to learning were not discovered until the users were actually in the system using it on a day to day basis. Our Customer Success Manager has offered to setup additional training sessions as needed to close the gaps in our learning. Some areas which required some additional training are setting up filters, dashboards, and generating reports.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
Read full review
The project manager for our implementation was great to work with and took the time to understand our business. We felt very comfortable going into the project with a reasonable scope of work to provide us with a functional version of Creatio to meet our needs. Unfortunately, we came across multiple challenges with this partner in their deliverables and timelines. Thankfully Creatio was able to provide support resources to ensure we were able to launch. We have since changed partners for our third-party support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
FileMaker Pro is the chaotic, cumbersome and non-integratable little sibling of MS Access. And even MS Access can't be taken serious in a medium sized company. FileMaker Pro can not even be compared to serious products like OutSystems and Sitecore. It's also not free... whereas at least MS Access can be used free, even if your company is (really) small.
Read full review
Creatio is miles ahead of Infor - now, looking back on Infor, it seems very dated and restricted. I love how you can work things out and change things yourself in Creatio. And if things are a bit more complicated, you have your dedicated team person to help you. We have Olga, who is amazing and really understands what we are trying to achieve.
Read full review
Scalability
it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
Read full review
I can see the promise of how it can be customized to other aspects of our business.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact for my company is that we have designed a solution that meets the needs of our very custom processes.
  • My company is in the process of expanding rapidly and with that the need for new tools are need quickly. With most languages (like Java or .Net), it could take weeks to develop the same tool it takes us 3 days to make in Filemaker.
  • The most negative impact however is that at times Filemaker will just become overwhelmed and we have no choice but to restart the server which hosts the application.
Read full review
  • We went from manually processing Work Orders into Invoices once a day - representing significant impact to turn around speeds - to submitting automatically in real time, eliminating a great deal of human transcription errors and freeing up a great deal of operations time
  • Custom Implementation automation in Creatio has eliminated 4-6 hours of configuration work per sale in comparison to our old manual methods
Read full review
ScreenShots

Creatio Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of