TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Clay

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AClay is a GTM enrichment product that combines access to 100+ data sources and AI agents with automated workflows to build any growth use case. Companies use it for tasks like recurring CRM enrichment to targeted outreach.

    $149

    per month 2000 credits per month

    Pricing
    Clay
    Editions & Modules
    Starter
    $149
    per month 2000 credits per month
    Explorer
    $349
    per month 10,000 credits per month
    Pro
    $800
    per month 50,000 credits per month
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Clay
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Clay
    Considered Both Products
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    Chose Clay
    I have not figured out any other product in this space. There is no direct competitor of Clay and that's what makes it different and unique.
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    Other products that we're looking at would be DataBar, Persona, and Freckle. Clay is significantly better versus any other products in market due to significantly better data coverage. And due to the flexibility of the UI.
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    So I won't say the names, but I said that we've tried some Clay competitors and what we saw is that the data is not as reliable and the enrichment is not that rich than in Clay, for example.
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    Honestly, not really any alternatives. I would find it really difficult to think of an alternative because if you have the right pick, basically the cost of switching for me is just too much to look further. So I'm really happy with what I'm getting for my money basically. I …
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    Clay offers a user friendly consumption based platform that is easy to experiment and scale.
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    Clay is much easier to use compared to n8n but n8n beats clay in terms of pricing and data privacy.

    Clay is fast and easy to iterate and experiment.
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    (I wrote iCustomer but it only recognized HiCustomer - iCustomer is an early stage competitor to Clay) I like Clay because it's easy to get started - the templates give you so many ideas and he community is incredibly strong. no one else has that going for them the way Clay …
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    It's just different, honestly. I think it's a good 'out of the box' solution. It's got almost everything out could need in one place. But it's a little too powerful and far too expensive for the true scrappy startup compared to Airtable + integrations. And it's too narrow in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    Clay is phenomenal middle mad, and is better than 6sense. However, data points are not as good as zoominfo. Looking forward to using the sequencer but having ability to have an activity dashboard in Salesloft makes it better suited for our needs
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    I don't know
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    was cheapest in terms of value + data quality
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    being able to source information from multiple providers puts it in a much better position than apollo
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    Clay is able to integrate many of these tools’ data in a waterfall and capabilities into its workflow.
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    I use both together.
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    It’s so much better jeeva was terrible to use in almost every way
    Incentivized
    Chose Clay
    Clay is better
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic