Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot, formerly Clearbit, is a data enrichment product that automatically updates sales records with verified company and contact data, with the goal of providing better insights into prospects.
$20,000
Annually
Owler
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Owler is a sales intelligence app developed by the company of the same name San Mateo and acquired by Meltwater June 2021, providing competitive insights, company information, and other sales relevant information.
$99
per year
Pricing
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
Owler
Editions & Modules
All Plans
$20,000.00
Annually
Plus (personal use)
$99
per year
Pro
$420
per year
Teams
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
Owler
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pricing is based on CRM database size, monthly web traffic, and monthly contact creation. Each product is subject to individual terms and plans may be available on a monthly or annual subscription.
For more information, contact Clearbit.
Clearbit is better in terms of brand recognition and after Husbpot acquisition it has improved in terms of data volume, data quality, and features apart from data enrichment also. The pricing is a bit on the higher side but worth because of the data quality and Hubspot …
When evaluating data enrichment solutions, we compared Clearbit against alternatives like ZoomInfo, InsideView, and D&B Hoovers. Clearbit emerged as our preferred choice for several key reasons:
Clearbit has been extremely beneficial for our organization. We still use and have access to some other tools, but it's the net new targeting that stands out for us, rather than a BlackBox of accounts that are in the market. When it comes to paid social where tracking and …
At that time we were thinking of a few more tools available in market. But once we reached out to them and got to know the features and ease of use, we narrowed down our search to Clearbit. Its integration with Salesforce with added features along with the pricing was best …
Time to realize ROI and system capability was not very clear, and my client was hesitant to take unnecessary risks. Time was not on our side in this selection and evaluation process. The client decided to go with Clearbit based on many factors but ultimately, the feedback …
The SDR team were using Clearbit and EverString together for a while for enhanced prospecting and prospect contact details. Now, however, only the research team uses EverString to enrich contact and company information in our prospected accounts.
DiscoverOrg has better contact info, but not as much company info (they focus on larger companies). Also, DiscoverOrg was much more expensive. Additionally DiscoverOrg wouldn't have satisfied our need to enrich our back-end database.
Clearbit is right up there with similar products. I find Clearbit useful in certain situations and specific industries. The user experience and integrations make it an easy tool to learn and use. In all this is a great tool, but I would like to see a broader range of data.
I use Full Contact for some applications and Clearbit for others. I have used Clearbit as a google extension and have enjoyed the clean interface. I love the UI in Clearbit and the simplicity of the design. Easy access and simple.
Clearbit is extremely more powerful than data.com. Clearbit has quality data, the ability to map directly into our Salesforce, multiple filters to search, api, and widget that connects to LinkedIn. The two are not comparable in terms of usage and capabilities to generate new …
DiscoverOrg is far better in terms of enrichment and overall usability. My experience with DiscoverOrg has provided me with more opportunities to close business.
Apollo is more of a complete system for things like sequences, tracking sales, meetings, recording meetings. It has a very strong search capability for individual contacts that can be broken down in many ways. Like job status, titles, geogrpahy. It also gives insights into …
Both Owler & Pitchbook are both sales and Business Intelligence application providing latest update and information regards to specifically company and products. Owler provide less details information compared with Pitchbook as the latter provide more insights and details. …
Director Of Ticket Sales and Corporate Partnership
Chose Owler
I believe Lead411 and Owler go hand in hand, rather than one over the other. I believe Lead411's contact generation is far stronger based on the cost, but Owler allows you to broaden your horizon for prospecting whereas Lead411 is more of a user-driven search rather than an …
Even though Owler is a great tool but when it comes to pay and use it may not be able to deliver more than its competitors in the market. Owler is used a lot to gather company information but along with other tools as its shortcomings are also known to people. Owler needs to …
Owler is comparable to both Crunchbase and PitchBook when looking to gather information on companies. Owler, however, is superior in areas of providing top competitors and insight into very small companies. I use S&P Capital IQ in tandem with Owler as it augments Owler well and …
If Owler seems lacking in background info, I have to Google search company information on a general level. Contact info can be obtained through ZoomInfo, but revenue info is not. Owler is the site I go to first.
Over the last few months and products updates, I've noticed that Owler, Crunchbase, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, and many other platforms are starting to be more and more competitive with each other. I have yet to find a real major differentiation between them. I guess I trust the …
Other platforms like ZoomInfo are fantastic, but they are much pricier than Owler. From a budget standpoint, Owler offers a pretty good bang for your buck.
The only service somewhat similar to Owler that I have used is Sales Navigator. I like Owler better because it provides more information about prospective partners. The two tools are different but have some similarities, so I typically use them both. I think the notifications …
Owler is free and this is its major strength. Other tools I mentioned have much more capabilities and more accurate and powerful data, but as a small business company, we do not need much data at this point. From Owler, we do not get a lot of data, but we get just enough data …
Both Insightly and DIscoverOrg are not like direct alternatives to Owler. We use Owler as it provides lots of information for free and we have been using it for a while and I do not know any other products that provide the same information, so I do not know real direct Owler …
For prospecting, I tend to use Owler and Sales Navigator. Sales Navigator is better on an individual basiI'mbut i'm more focused on getting company wide initiatives and bringing that down to the individual level.
Owler is a free service so its primary direct competitors would be Google Alerts (it has much higher precision and a unified daily alert), and the freemium InsideView which supports three alerts.
I view it as a complement to fully featured subscription sales intelligence …
Features
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
Owler
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Product A and Product B
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
7.5
Ratings
3% below category average
Owler
7.1
Ratings
8% below category average
Advanced search
8.00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Identification of new leads
8.50 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
List quality
7.10 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
List upload/download
6.60 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting
6.60 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Load time/data access
8.50 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
9.0
Ratings
15% above category average
Owler
7.8
Ratings
1% above category average
Contact information
9.00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Company information
9.00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Industry information
9.00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Product A and Product B
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
7.1
Ratings
4% below category average
Owler
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Lead qualification process
7.50 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations
6.60 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Salesforce integration
9.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Company/business profiles
8.50 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Alerts and reminders
7.10 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Data hygiene
6.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Automatic data refresh
7.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Tags
5.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Filters and segmentation
5.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Product A and Product B
Clearbit is great for companies with large sales teams who focus on high touch prospecting. The time saved by not having to search a prospect's LinkedIn profile, but simply see data in the CRM is awesome. On the other hand, Clearbit may not be as ideal in a company where sales are very transactional
Owler is best used as a supplemental asset, as it allows you to get very granular on specific prospects. I believe its limitations lie in the fact that while you can see the competitive companies, it's difficult to get any prospecting information out of them ie., contacts, without going for the highest level plan.
Really good industry- or company-specific rss feed.
Love the funding/merger/acquisition alerts that we get on companies and portfolios that we follow. Often even more timely than Crunchbase since it's based on press releases rather than Crunchbase's data team reaching out to VCs to get their portfolio updates.
Pretty good firmographic data on companies (# of employees, ann. revenue, website, c-suite members, etc.).
Clearbit is like other products that I use and the biggest challenge I have is getting it to work with the programs I want to use. I would love to have all my programs flow through something like Clearbit without a lot of programming and API juggling. Not a Clearbit issue, however, it would be awesome to have a universal IO API that we can all plug into and make life simple.
The information provided is useful but at times the variation with other websites and tools is substantial which makes it difficult to rely solely on owler
Information only about bigger companies is available not for smaller and research on smaller ones are important as there are not many tools that do that
There are few companies that appear as defunct or do not exist but in the actual market there is a lot going on with them and being in market intelligence industry owler needs to capture that
It would be great if they provide revenue or growth of the in the past three years or so. As it would save our time and efforts to some extent
They need to maintain the database in aperiodic manner with precise information
The majority of the time it provides quick, accessible and easy to use information about the company and contact information. This has really helped us to personalise our outreach while also making it faster to prospect accounts. I don't give it a ten as this information can be inaccurate. Including the LinkedIn link which sometimes re-directs to old LinkedIn accounts, or just the wrong one. This seems to be caused by not updating the information regularly enough (just a feeling, no evidence)
Clearbit is very easy to use. Any new joiner can self-onboard, self-learn in matter of hours, if not minutes. Its integration feature within Hubspot and also with Salesforce makes it easy for marketing team to use it every day. The customer support team is also very responsive and helpful to resolve issues within few days
I think it's well designed but always room for improvement. Maybe more customization in layout or information presented. Maybe even a layout that allows comparison and ranking of companies in a similar industry or vertical, or company size, and geography
I have yet to see the platform down or running slowly, but there have been multiple instances recently (Q2 2015) when the user links to a news story and Owler gives an Oops message. Users simply click on the story a second time and the story is displayed. This is a nuisance bug. I also have a sense that the system is not processing alerts as quickly as before, but I haven't tracked this closely, so I could be wrong about it.
The news precision, which is the most important feature for me, is very accurate. They have editors review the news to ensure it is properly tagged by company and event type.
The team has been extremely helpful and works with us one on one with issues we come across. My main issues with the service is it’s outward interactions with us since purchasing the product. They have not proactively checked in to see how our is doing with the product.
Focus on setting up companies that have limited news coverage first. Public companies are well covered and it is easy to track them. Furthermore, the surfeit of news around public companies can crowd out smaller companies with less news. It is smaller companies where you are most likely to see a benefit in their tracking of news, blogs, press releases, and videos.
Clearbit is right up there with similar products. I find Clearbit useful in certain situations and specific industries. The user experience and integrations make it an easy tool to learn and use. In all this is a great tool, but I would like to see a broader range of data
Apollo is more of a complete system for things like sequences, tracking sales, meetings, recording meetings. It has a very strong search capability for individual contacts that can be broken down in many ways. Like job status, titles, geogrpahy. It also gives insights into technology in use and intent
Owler has enabled those in my organization to demonstrate their knowledge on companies to clients without spending too much time working to procure information from various sources.
Owler contributes to a more comprehensive analysis of companies when making investment decisions.
Owler can be frustrating to use and inefficient as a result of a lack of robust data quality measures.