With CodeTwo, users can quickly set up automatic email signatures, legal disclaimers, and branding on all email apps and devices in their organization. CodeTwo offers an award-winning cloud service for Microsoft 365 & Office 365, developed in compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 & 27018.
$0.81
per month per user
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Mimecast Cloud Archive provides an archive storage solution for data retention, as well as search and retrieval of email, attachments and MS Teams conversations. The cloud archiving solution offers search capabilities for employees and automated tools for administrators that simplify management of mailboxes, e-discovery and litigation support.
N/A
Pricing
CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Editions & Modules
Monthly subscription (500 users)
$0.81
per month per user
Yearly subscription (500 users)
$8.76
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Pricing depends on the number of licences and the subscription plan (yearly or monthly). The yearly plan includes 10% discount.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Considered Both Products
CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Very similar pricing, but we chose CodeTwo Email Signatures 365because it offered more flexibility with multiple businesses and linked with Active Directory where all our staff information is stored. This makes maintenance much easier and avoids double entry of informatio n. …
Previously, we had a local signature script that distributed the signatures centrally. This script had to use a complex process to retrieve the HTML templates and fill the placeholders. What's more, the tool only worked for Outlook on Windows - no other operating systems, …
CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 was the winner for us over other products we tested; because it was the best value with all of the features it has to offer. The management capabilities and the ease of configuration was a large factor for us as well. The Editing tools that are …
Much more cost effective. Implementation was quicker and less administrative overhead needed. Much easier to manage. Support services were more engaging and demonstrated a desire for you to have a really positive experience with the product I never got that same level of …
CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 has all the
functionality that we’re looking for and is the only solution verified with
Microsoft, and so accordingly complies with all our compliance/security
Before using CodeTwo (Exchange Rules Pro) we tried to accomplish the same affect using just transport rules. Obviously, this requires someone with more technical knowledge and specific permissions to Exchange, and it was a nightmare to maintain while at the same time not really …
CodeTwo has a great feature set at a much better price than it's competitors. Price was a big selling factor for us. We got what we thought was the best solution at the best offered price. This was a win win for us.
Systems Engineer - Microsoft 365 Certified Administrator Expert
Chose CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Unfortunately, we have often had problems with CI-Sign. Rolling out the signatures often didn't work and the administration was a problem for our e-mail administrators every time. In addition, the support was unfortunately not good. All this is better with CodeTwo Email …
We have not evaluated other solutions. CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 was inherited as part of an acquisition. We loved it so much, we have plans to expand its use to the parent company.
Cost: Depending on the size of the organization and the features needed, there could be costs associated with licensing and maintenance of the CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 solution.Complexity: Implementing and configuring the solution may require time and resources, especially …
Ultimately, our organization selected CodeTwo Email Signatures for Microsoft 365 due to its seamless integration with Microsoft 365 and our current licensing model we use at Microsoft 365, robust feature set, very user-friendly interface, and reputation for reliability and …
Big factors in our decision-making were multi-tenancy support, pricing, dynamic signature processing, workflow consistency and the ability to access the raw html if needed. CodeTwo Email Signatures 365's cloud processing specifically offers great flexibility and allows us to …
I was not the one evaluating and so I can not remember the names of other solutions. What I do remember is that CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 provides the most robust set of features (and now we know that it is also very stable) for a reasonable price.
Formerly all signatures were managed with a custom script that gets a users details from a database that we had to edit manually every time something changed.
We did not evaluate other products. We knew other companies that were using CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 and knew that was what we were going to go with. Visiting their website reinforced this belief when we saw all of the fortune 500 companies they have listed that are using …
Functionality and price as well as support has been outstanding for CodeTwo Email Signatures 365. Havent had a support ticket go unanswered for more than a couple of hours. All answers by their support team have been understanding, polite and always helpful. Would easily …
Mimecast Cloud Archive is by far the better system. Firstly it integrates into existing security services provided by Mimecast and overall it is built purely for email and large volumes of both users and emails.
Its much faster to search for and send the emails as opposed to Kaseya where you need to restore the backup before you are able to search through the emails
We loved the intuitive dashboard and user management aspect and almost zero touch once configured, the ability for it to archive everything sent and received how quick it is to be able to delegate a former employees archive to someone else the ability to export content and …
Mimecast gave us some extra features that we believed were beneficial to our business. Removing the archive from the Microsoft hardware was also good to allow separation. Plus, adding the optional exchange backup made Mimecast a clear choice.
The product offering is comparable, while the price is significantly less expensive in contrast to those offered by rivals. Additionally, the solution offers simple indexing and recovery, and it is nicely integrated into a variety of different ecosystems. Connecting across …
The product offering is similar but the cost is lower in comparison to competitors. Also, the product is well integrated into various ecosystems and provides easy recovery and indexing. There are various connectors and APIs available which makes it easy to connect across …
I was not involved in a decision-making process to purchase my podcast although I have used other tools in the past and my has the easiest interface to use And navigate. The learning curve is very short using this product. It’s a big benefit and plus that you were able to …
Mimecast has been identified by Gartner as the top product in its magic quadrant. We found the product the easiest to implement with the best support and feature set. It has been very reliable and when we have had questions, feature requests or problems, the company has been …
Mimecast was a more complete and mature solution in our evaluation. Their services go far beyond just email archiving. Cost and the fact it is a cloud solution is a benefit.
One of the big features of Mimecast is the ability to send large files. We used to use CItrix Sharefile for this but switched over to Mimecast's LFS for one large reason...since we are archiving all of our mail in Mimeast anyway we would have wanted these attachments, even if …
Users are not able to delete emails hence Mimecast EIA becomes a very useful tool during e-discovery. For EOA, they offer an inplace archive which means that emails can be deleted if the service is not turned on.
To achieve the same outcomes, a mix of in-place archive & litigation hold rules needs to be implemented. This is quite convoluted, not to mention we usually encounter a poor experience when working with Exchange eDiscovery/Purview.
As opposed to its competitors, Mimecast Could Archive is a product designed IN the cloud. The other products were all basically traditional appliances hosted in the cloud and come with many limitations that Mimecast doesn't have. The ease of management and use of Mimecast is …
Copilot CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 is ideal for large organizations, regulated industries, and companies leveraging email signatures for marketing. It ensures brand consistency, compliance, and effective marketing through centralized management and dynamic content. However, it may be less suitable for small businesses with the need of purchasing a minimum of 10 licenses. I think there is room to offer a package for smaller businesses with less than 10 users as they can still benefit from the professional display of signatures.
Given all the threats that are out there and the fact many come in via email, I think Mimecast is a great solution for any business of any size. If your business is heavily regulated then you have even more reason to use Mimecast. You might be able to do a lot of these things yourself but why would you? Mimecast employees are experts, the best in the industry, at knowing how email works and how to protect it.
It archives every email into and out of your enterprise including mail between internal users. This provides a legally acceptable archive that we can access at any point to find emails whether we need just one from a year ago or a lot to enter into a court case.
Since we have our MX record pointing to them first, they host all of our email in the cloud so users can access it even in the event our local email repository is down. We used this feature quite well during this past years Hurricane season.
Mimecast has a feature that allows me to sandbox all links, in emails, before users are redirected to them. This has saved us several times in that users clicked on links they should not have but Mimecast intercepted the request and stopped the user from going to the site.
Changing font type and color doesn't work as expected when editing multiple lines in the simple editor
The custom scheduler lacks the option to recurrently schedule yearly events, e.g. the yearly Christmas signature from Dec 15 to Jan 15.
You can preview a signature with real user data when editing the template, but you cannot preview a signature based on multiple rules combined like a regular signature followed by a marketing banner and then a disclaimer.
The implementation of the application was very simple. With just a few clicks, the Outlook add-in was rolled out and the first signature was assigned to a test group. From that point on, I was able to familiarize myself with the product very well with my team and get a feel for how we carry out a smooth onboarding. In the meantime, all our employees have switched to CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 and send every single email with the correct signature. Administration is very easy for us. Adding new people to the signature groups works smoothly. We recently changed our entire signature to a new format. Within a few minutes, all our colleagues had the new signature, even without restarting Outlook. The product has shortened our daily support many times over and we are happy to be able to continue using it in the future.
The archive is easy to use and the searching is highly customizable. You can easily search based on timeframe, sender, recipient, words, phrases, and attachments. The ability to search keywords within attachments, body, and subject line is incredibly helpful. We're able to quickly and easily find what we're looking for.
There is never an issue. Everytime I have needed to access my own personal search archive or globally search across the whole business it works each time. I cannot recall a time where the service was down when needed to be used and all our staff use it daily.
The stability of the tool is the biggest factor, it has a fantastic uptime and the loading speed is exceptional. Long gone are the days of waiting for Outlook to open up a traditional PST archive, I can simply click, find what I need and go, usually, before outlook has opened the archive. It is an exceptionally efficient tool.
No problems but we had a couple of questions about functionality or edge use cases and anytime I contacted CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 support I was absolutely happy with their responses. Very helpful, polite and smart people are working over at CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 support. I would suggest other companies to take note on CodeTwo Email Signatures 365's quality of support and service.
It does a good job. The support team of the product was good and responsive and was also able to fix the issues I was experiencing at the time. It isn't perfect and takes some time to set up properly in the environment but once set up the product does what it is supposed to do which is what you are paying for.
We used Mimecast professional services for the implementation and it was flawless as we were migrating from a competitor's product. The only downside was the amount of time required to ingest all the data as this was coming from a few different sources and in some cases it took months to migrate and index all the content. Apart from that the process was very well guided, with plenty of communication all throughout and without any major issues or downtime.
Previously, we had a local signature script that distributed the signatures centrally. This script had to use a complex process to retrieve the HTML templates and fill the placeholders. What's more, the tool only worked for Outlook on Windows - no other operating systems, applications or mobile devices. We also tested other signature software. In terms of simplicity of administration in connection with the price-performance ratio, nothing could keep up with CodeTwo Email Signatures 365.
Mimecast gave us some extra features that we believed were beneficial to our business. Removing the archive from the Microsoft hardware was also good to allow separation. Plus, adding the optional exchange backup made Mimecast a clear choice.
100% adoption within the business in less than a week
Significant feedback from our staff on how professional the styling and format looks and the ease of use
this will save multiple hours of IT administration effort (in the region of 2 hours per week) for signature management historically due to the centralised nature of the platform now
Before we enabled our Mimecast archive, we had multiple cases of users who had 10k+ emails "disappear" and could not find them. Trying to figure this out with Microsoft is near impossible. IT spent 5-10 hours on each situation trying to find, recover, and move the emails back into the user's mailbox.
A couple term cases happened as well where the user deleted everything in their mailbox and recoverable area had be cleared automatically by the time we found out. One of them would have been 28k emails and would take days to recover.
Since having Mimecast, it is a matter of going to the mailbox in the Sync and Recover and clicking a few things and restoring all the data. Super easy and restoring the data takes less time than manually doing it with a Microsoft Content Search export.