Common Areas vs. Hippo CMMS

Hippo CMMS

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Common Areas	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Navigating ever-changing facility demands is no day at the beach. Reduce risk and increase operational productivity by connecting people, places, partners and processes. Common Areas gives business owners and FM firms an agile toolset designed to ensure safety and performance across every location Work Order Management Facility Inspections Space Management Preventive Maintenance Incident Management Operational Reports	N/A
Hippo CMMS	Score 2.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…	$35 per month per user

Pricing

Common Areas

Hippo CMMS

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Hippo Starter: $35
per month per user
Hippo Plus: $55
per month per user
Hippo Pro: $75
per month per user

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Common Areas	Hippo CMMS
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

$600 Single User

Additional Details

—

Hippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Common Areas	Hippo CMMS
Considered Both Products	Common Areas No answer on this topic	Hippo CMMS Verified User Anonymous Chose Hippo CMMS We used PMC before switching to Hippo [CMMS]. Hippo [CMMS] is much more user friendly and cost effective, and the paperless option was not even available through PMC at the time. The simplicity of entering PM's and work requests in Hippo [CMMS] is far superior to the previous … Incentivized Helpful? ML Melvin Larsen Hospital Tech Specialist Chose Hippo CMMS Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their … Incentivized Helpful? Tim Heath Plant Manager Chose Hippo CMMS Hippo CMMS was more user friendly for my maintenance men then the other software programs we tested. The difference was really how easy Hippo is to use navigate. Also the price point was a little better then the competitors. The calendar view really helped sell us on the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Hippo CMMS I have used AMMS extensively. Hippo is far superior to AMMS as it is much easier to manage and much more intuitive. AMMS can be managed but it is tricky. It takes some time to learn all of the ins and outs. Hippo is much easier from the start. I have looked into Bigfoot CMMS … Incentivized Helpful? Matthew Miser Facilities Director Chose Hippo CMMS I can't remember the names of other computer maintenance software, but the main reason for the selection of Hippo CMMS was cost. Hippo CMMS came in much lower than the other CMMS' while still providing the same features and functions. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Common Areas	Hippo CMMS
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	TOPdesk Score 8.8 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Enterprises	TOPdesk Score 8.8 out of 10	No answers on this topic
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Common Areas	Hippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	2.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.6 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Common Areas	Hippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution. Incentivized MP Mark Paul Assistant Director of Facilities Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Tracks machine maintenance costs. Keeps preventative maintenance work orders on track. Keeps history of all past work orders for review in case a problem you've already dealt with comes up again. Incentivized Tim Heath Plant Manager Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Mobile App - They are improving as i type this Simplified Mobile app for requester only. Not everyone needs the full CMMS Notifications of comments on completed work orders - In case I don't see a comment Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Customer support for Hippo CMMS has always been extremely friendly and helpful. They are quick to respond to even the simplest need. Incentivized Matthew Miser Facilities Director Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	We used PMC before switching to Hippo [CMMS]. Hippo [CMMS] is much more user friendly and cost effective, and the paperless option was not even available through PMC at the time. The simplicity of entering PM's and work requests in Hippo [CMMS] is far superior to the previous system, and the customer support is much better. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Overall Hippo has had a positive impact. The annual cost is low, and the equipment has better OEE due to better maintenance due to better tracking. It is easy to justify labor based on planned work and completed work. It is easy to assess the workload. Maintaining equipment increases production. This is a good tool for keeping equipment in good working order. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		Hippo CMMS Screenshots