TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Concrete CMS

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AConcrete CMS (formerly Concrete5) is a free and open source, PHP built content management system for content on the web and also for intranets. It is optimized to support the creation of online magazines and newspapers.N/A

    WordPress

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AWordpress is an open-source publishing platform popular with bloggers, and a content management system, known for its simplicity and modifiability. Websites may host their own blogging communities, controlling and moderating content from a single dashboard.

    $3

    per month 6 GB storage

    Pricing
    Concrete CMSWordPress
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Personal
    $4
    per month 6 GB storage
    Premium
    $8
    per month 13 GB storage
    Business
    $25
    per month 50 GB storage
    Commerce
    $45
    per month 50 GB storage
    Enterprise
    Contact for pricing
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Concrete CMSWordPress
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Pricing for Business and Commerce plans vary on number of GB.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Concrete CMSWordPress
    Considered Both Products
    Portland Labs
    Chose Concrete CMS
    WordPress is a basic blogging tool that has been hacked into a CMS, it is not as intuitive or comprehensive as Concrete CMS. It requires more updates and it can be harder to locate settings that the user needs. However, as a business, the WordPress team has been very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I didn't have to spend too much time learning Concrete CMS, whereas I had to spend a long time learning other CMSs. After struggling to develop a plugin for WordPress, developing an add-on for Concrete CMS was piece of cake thanks to many available APIs. Making custom themes …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 outshines WordPress in almost all regards. The only two areas in which I've known WordPress to be the better option are:
    • Its "Advanced Custom Fields" plugin, which has slightly more flexibility than Concrete5's built-in attributes system
    • Its menu creator which, while …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    WordPress at the time was riddled with security breaches in the news and while Concrete5 was smaller (and therefore a smaller attack vector), after eleven years of use, Concrete5 has only had one published incident with an add-on that resolved within hours and with excellent …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is superior in most usecases to all other commonly used CMS platforms. The only thing where Joomla is outpreforming it is bulk editing. WordPress needs at least 20 plugins to do what Concrete5 does out of the box.
    Programming C5 templates and custom views is a dream, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    WordPress is much easier to use but I feel that it has less to offer. If you are looking for an easy WYSIWYG web site editor, WordPress is probably a great option. If you are looking for something a little more robust, Concrete5 may be an option to look in to.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5's UI is a bit more dated compared to WordPress, and the ecosystem for plugins is smaller. But out of the box, Concrete5 does more with its clean code than WordPress does. WordPress's UI and large plugin/community around it is its biggest strength as a product, not the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is easier to use than Drupal or Joomla, and beats them in terms of features. WordPress gives Concrete5 a run for its money as far as extension and theme availability, as well as user base and support availability. But Concrete5 beats WordPress hands down with features …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    WordPress has a very confusing unintuitive admin section for the user to use while Concrete5 was much more intuitive and effective for people not use to working with a CMS solution. Components are selectable by areas you create in the page template and allows a user to quickly …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I believe WordPress and Drupal to be superior products. But Concrete5 holds its own against them. I selected Concrete5 for real estate and marketing firms for the ease of use and updating. The drop and drag editor is hard to beat.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    We did not select Concrete5 as we inherited it. If selecting again, we would use WordPress, Drupal or another CMS to meet our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I think Concrete5 is much easier to learn and edit than WordPress.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    My initial test was to time how long it took to create a very basic site from scratch with no prior knowledge. Concrete CMS won decisively. Over time, I've worked on projects that use other systems, and the challenges I encounter always affirm my choice to stay with Concrete …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    ConcreteCMS is different from all other a used. all others have a specific purpose, like Odoo or Dolibarr for ERP/CRM, Magento Prestashop ... for e-commerce, GLPI and other CMMS for material management, and so on. Concrete CMS is usable for all, flexible, natively for CMS or …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Easier to set up and manage. Easier to edit content. Not as feature-rich so it might not work for very special projects. Harder to get client buy-in when they only know Word Press. Great for quick projects, and for the right client more complex engagements. Free of complex …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Better user-friendly administration, more easy to be extended
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 was far easier to use than alternatives--which is very important when handling support issues for clients. As a developer, the architecture makes it easier to extend the core functions elegantly without overwriting core code. Although a few other CMS platforms have …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Wide support of stack
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I select Concrete5 when working with an experienced PHP-developer. The code is exceptionally well-written and to my clients, C5 is a secure, easy to edit platform for websites that do not have a too high dependence on third-party plugins.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    If your web team is tired of dealing with CMS training issues, you need to consider Concrete5. If your technical team and host are tired of dealing with website security issues, you need to consider Concrete5. If you're pulling your hair out over frequent update patches …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is by far the easiest for the end user. The user who edits the website can do so with very little training and not just with regards to the content. New pages and functions are easy to create and install. SEOand contact form functions are built in as standard.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I adopted Concrete5 after an end-user trial. With a variety of well known and lesser known CMS (including the above) in their fresh install state, I asked a group of users to register an account and then add a page with some text and an image on it. Concrete5 came out top by a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is probably the most user friendly for clients. I selected Concrete5 mostly because I found out about it and didn't really believe its capabilities and had to try it out. It pretty much is what a non-tech savvy person would want in a CMS for content management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Personally I feel that WordPress is overly complicated and not as efficient as Concrete5. For example, Wordpress is a blogging platform hacked into a CMS, where Concrete5 is almost like a foundation with a CMS component. Concrete5 is very similar to Drupal just without the …
    Incentivized
    Automattic
    Chose WordPress
    WordPress is easier to learn and implement. It isn’t as robust as Drupal and Joomla out of the box, but with plugins and themes you can accomplish most things that these other CMS can do. Although WordPress can get bulky as you add more functionality, in comparison it’s easier …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Concrete CMSWordPress
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Concrete CMS and WordPress
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    9.5
    38 Ratings
    WordPress
    8.7
    131 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.538 Ratings8.7131 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Concrete CMS and WordPress
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    9.7
    33 Ratings
    WordPress
    8.7
    107 Ratings
    API9.731 Ratings8.997 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language9.730 Ratings8.481 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Concrete CMS and WordPress
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    8.4
    42 Ratings
    WordPress
    8.3
    137 Ratings
    WYSIWYG editor9.342 Ratings8.7124 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness10.037 Ratings7.0123 Ratings
    Admin section10.040 Ratings8.7135 Ratings
    Page templates10.040 Ratings9.0132 Ratings
    Library of website themes4.238 Ratings6.5134 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design9.739 Ratings9.0133 Ratings
    Publishing workflow7.737 Ratings8.7128 Ratings
    Form generator6.639 Ratings9.0106 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Concrete CMS and WordPress
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    6.9
    40 Ratings
    WordPress
    8.6
    135 Ratings
    Content taxonomy8.939 Ratings8.9115 Ratings
    SEO support9.039 Ratings8.7121 Ratings
    Bulk management6.039 Ratings7.4102 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions5.439 Ratings8.7124 Ratings
    Community / comment management5.439 Ratings9.2124 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Concrete CMSWordPress
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (59 ratings)
    8.4
    (173 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (22 ratings)
    10.0
    (37 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (11 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.8
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)