Confluent vs. Mage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluent
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.
$0
Mage
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Mage is a tool that helps product developers use AI and their data to make predictions. Use cases might be predictions for churn prevention, product recommendations, customer lifetime value and forecasting sales.
$0
per user
Pricing
ConfluentMage
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
Hobby
$0
per user
Pro
$2,000
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluentMage
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsConfluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).Contact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConfluentMage
Features
ConfluentMage
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Mage
-
Ratings
Real-Time Data Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Low Latency9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Enrichment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ConfluentMage
Small Businesses
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.2 out of 10
Astera Data Pipeline Builder (Centerprise)
Astera Data Pipeline Builder (Centerprise)
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 6.6 out of 10
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ConfluentMage
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ConfluentMage
Likelihood to Recommend
If your company needs to build event-driven applications, like in healthcare industry, you need to enhance interoperability, and you are seeking a reliable service with enterprise-grade support, Confluent is the best on the market you can get. Their product works great and they provide very good customer service.
Read full review
Mage is well-suited for probability score for uptake of every product is calculated for customers using ML/ Regression models, choosing customers for a product/ Top products for a customer, based on the requirement and Identifying popular product combinations using association rules from Market Basket Analysis (or affinity Analysis)\Bundle these products as combos.
Read full review
Pros
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
  • Ranking algorithms.
  • Cloud-based tool.
  • Increase user engagement.
Read full review
Cons
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
  • Acquisition Contribution.
  • Business Intelligence Reporting.
  • Data Destinations.
Read full review
Support Rating
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Mage was the easiest in terms of ease of implementation due to its no-code functionality. However, Mage doesn't have a whole ecosystem like AWS and slightly falls behind there.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Confluent replaced Microsoft Event Hubs in our environment and unblocked data platform services rollout globally.
Read full review
  • Business Understanding.
  • Data Acquisition and Understanding.
  • Data Modeling and Evaluation.
Read full review
ScreenShots