Conga CPQ vs. Vision-e Maps
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Conga CPQ | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Conga CPQ empowers sales, partners, and customers to efficiently configure complex products and services offerings, and provide personalized prices and quotes, utilizing codified product and pricing information - to drive higher win rates and a more pleasurable buying experience. Conga CPQ also helps to maintain a single price book, discounting structure, and quoting structure across all channels. With an API-first approach, configuration, pricing, or quoting capabilities that can… | $35 per month per user |
 Vision-e Maps | N/A | N/A | Vision-e Maps is a native Salesforce solution designed to be simple to use, providing the core power of Google Mapping, and allowing users to customize map markers based on Salesforce criteria. By adding color rules, the user can hand pick which records to focus on. Its Route Optimization feature shows salespeople the most time efficient route. It is available on the Salesforce AppExchange. | $29 per month per user |
| Conga CPQ | Vision-e Maps | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Conga CPQ | Vision-e Maps | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conga CPQ | Vision-e Maps | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.8 | - |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.0 | - |
| Online Training | 7.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 1.0 | - |