Constant Contact is a full-featured email marketing solution with capabilities such as social media integration, drag-and-drop editing, and real-time reporting. It is a bulk email tool designed for SMB customers. Since 2019, Constant Contact also offers marketing automation features, a website and landing page builder, and other tools to support midsize businesses.
$12
per month
Net-Results
Score 8.1 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Pricing
Constant Contact
Net-Results
Editions & Modules
Lite
Starting at $12.00
per month
Standard
Starting at $35.00
per month
Premium
Starting at $80.00
per month
One Price Full Platform
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Constant Contact
Net-Results
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
The SMS Marketing tool can be added to any Standard or Premium Constant Contact account. SMS is only available in the US for Standard and Premium paid plans. SMS can be added when logged in to an account after purchase. Plans start at $10/month for up to 500 messages.
Tiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.
Constant Contact destroys Microsoft 365 when it comes to mass emailing. Microsofts max email recipients is like twenty people at once. Constant Contact you can email thousands at a time WITH dynamic content. Meaning if some clients are in New York and some in New Jersey, you …
The ease of use and segmentation of Constant Contact makes it superior! You can upload images easily and it is pretty easy to walk someone through how to design and email and upload an email list for sending.
1. Constant Contact provides features that were well suited for us being a mid-size organization. 2. Implementation of Constant Contact with Wordpress and WooCommerce was easy as compared to Brevo. 3. Peer-recommendations, brand reputation and research by our internal team also …
It's been a long time since I used MailChimp. I do remember being impressed the first time I used Constant Contact after having used MailChimp exclusively for a couple of years.
Mailchimp is pretty comparable in a lot of ways to Constant Contact, but Constant Contact just continues to win when it comes to deliver-ability and user-interface. It's clean, simple, and intuitive.
There are other platforms like ActiveCampaign and Klaviyo that have some …
Constant Contact is quite intuitive making it easy to distribute the workload such as one person creates conntent, one migrates it to the template, one edits the content, and so on. However, it is easy for any one of us to do each others work.
We selected Constant Contact due to pricing constraints. However, if the pricing were to increase, we may look at alternative products that offer more features. We are looking for a product that will allow us to stand out from other organizations like ours that are appealing to …
I know what CC offers (but not sure if the others offer this or Retargetting - CC automatically retargets any of our customers with abandoned carts. We also set triggers on our promotional email system, and for follow-ups. This has been very helpful in targeting and retargeting …
They’re both pretty similar software, however mailchimp maybe more intuitive. I think they are similar in terms of deliverability at this point. Constant Contact might be more bang for the same buck.
Very similar in nature. I feel it's more just what works for your organization as to what solution you are more familiar with and the pricing structure that fits your needs. For most organizations with sales departments, I would recommend a email platform that is linked with …
In my view, If I were made aware of Constant Contact's lack of performance, I would have never created an account. I would rather use Wix, or even just social media! It would be more effective, user-friendly, and less costly or stressful, I believe.
it is the youngest sibling compared to the much more competent and capable older brother that is Marketo Engage. The reports, database management, and complete control of email designs, and interaction of recipients does not compare. Constant Contact is a great entry-level …
We use BEE Pro to create our emails; we like their email builder. However, when sending emails, Constant Contact is much better. They allow more emails to be sent out at once and let us store more contacts within the program. Constant Contact has greater flexibility and variety …
Constant Contact is much more intuitive for people who are not tech-savvy. Also, while SendGrid offered more options in it's drag and drop interface, it displayed differently across different email clients, which made it very cumbersome to use. It also took much longer to …
Overall, Constant Contact is the easiest to use with one of the lower price points. It is a great entry-level tool for a beginner in order to graduate into more sophisticated platforms. The design features are a good start along with the subject line testing which is helpful …
Constant contact was perfect for our needs for many clients, it wasn’t overly robust, but powerful enough to see strong ROI. With regards to the competitor tools, amongst standard ESP there’s not a huge difference as they all essentially work the same, it’s just about pricing …
Overall we chose Constant Contact over MailChimp because we felt the price was a better use of our non-profit funding. Reviews of MailChimp showed led us to believe that Constant Contact was easier to use and had better customer service. We've found that Constant Contact has …
We've used ClickDimensions and Marketo. We felt that ClickDimensions was more limited as far as creating effective email campaigns and not as easy to use. It also is completely native to Dynamics CRM, which can be a positive and a negative. Marketo was the previous solution …
Constant Contact was great for what it was. We were wanting to see who was visiting our website and be able to get more leads that way. When we found out that Net-Results offered email marketing as well it made sense to use that. Creating, building and sending the emails to our …
Net-Results is much better than a lot of marketing platforms on the market.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Net-Results
Marketing automation at its core has become very standardized. While most platforms can easily compete with one another it is difficult to ignore the small company factor when it comes to top-notch support. Net-Results cares a great deal about your success and do what they can …
Net-Results is 10X more powerful than HubSpot, which to us was a basic marketing automation implementation that focused only on top of funnel acquisition.
Net-Results is structured for the marketing automation power user whereas Pardot is structured for the generic marketing …
Net-Results is much easier to use, I'd say some other softwares can be guesswork. All the features of the big marketing automation softwares are included in Net-Results. And don't even try to compare prices!
We selected Net-Results because they aren't too big to not care about their customers. They work with our company on an individual basis, integrating our systems so that, working together, we are more efficient and effective. The mammoth companies wouldn't care whether we …
--Priced much much better than the big dogs in the industry, and similar to platforms with much fewer features --Support is excellent and includes phone support, which the others didn't --Doesn't need to take over your blog and host it on their site, like others do.
Net-results is more cost effective and you feel like you really get to know the team. This is not a big organization feel, but they have a lot of power.
Net-Results was far more customizable and able to integrate with our website than any other solution. It is more intuitive than Strongmail and more powerful than Constant Contact. Blue Hornet didn't offer this level of integration.
Initially, we made inquiries with other providers. It seemed they were either too large, or too small. Net-Results provided a team responsive to our specific needs, without having to tolerate a voicemail hockey game with each inquiry. I am able to contact the appropriate …
Features
Constant Contact
Net-Results
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Net-Results
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
8.40 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.70 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
8.50 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Landing pages
7.80 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
A/B testing
7.10 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Mobile optimization
8.60 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
List management
8.30 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
7.20 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Net-Results
6.3
Ratings
15% below category average
Dashboards
8.40 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.30 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.50 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
Net-Results
-
Ratings
URL Validation
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Link Tracking
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Image Validation
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inbox Display
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Accessibility Tools
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Spelling and Grammar Check
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Spam Testing
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Previews
9.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Net-Results
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact is great when trying to target specific market segments. We typically like to segment our master list by region, but also have product segments, as well. They do provide pre-made segments to start you off too. We don't usually use their email builder, we find others to be more flexible, intuitive, and have more variety. We do prefer emailing from Constant Contact, however.
It's great for a small to medium-sized marketing team. We manage it with just a two person marketing staff. It also works well with the Professional version of Salesforce. It works well for moderately skilled marketers, meaning ones that might not have previous marketing automation experience or lots of digital experience. The other options are much more complex. Hope that helps!
Visibility - Net-Results provides an excellent view into the current state of our prospects. We can understand how prospects are engaging with our assets, create detailed segments, and track prospects through the different stages of our nurturing campaigns.
Responsive email design - Net-Results has an excellent drag and drop email builder that uses responsive email designs. It is the easiest email builder I've ever used and the emails look great on both desktop and phones.
Support - Obviously support is not a product feature, but it is one of the most important aspects to consider when choosing solutions. Net-Results in the front of the pack when it comes to support. Their support team is intelligent, responsive, and is able to provide a resolution often in only one or two emails.
Campaign flexibility - There is a great deal of flexibility when it comes to structuring campaigns. Between segmentation and logical branching Net-Results is able to execute campaigns just as you envision them. They've done a nice job making the campaign complexity scalable, allowing simple campaigns to be created with ease.
Sometimes some software provides outdated and useless features and functions, but this email marketing tool gives advanced kinds of functionalities with modern features.
I like the ease of use of this platform also appreciate its professional customer support team.
I am no longer desperate after getting this tool at my work.
Adding new contacts to our contact list. I would love integrations with Outlook. I am communicating with new people every day and it would be awesome to be able to tag a new contact and automatically add that person to an appropriate contact segment without logging in and manually adding a new contact (which I rarely do)
There is no doubt that we are going to renew Constant Contact. We have not just invested a lot of time in learning and creating a great looking product but we have developed a strong database of information that allows us to track how we are doing for each newsletter. This supports our goals of creating products that residents desire and are excited to receive.
There is always room for improvement. I don't know how they test their systems, but they should invite not-so computer savvy people to test it. If I, as an expert have problems, they need to think like the technophobe. Since I've used Constant Contact in the past as part of my former employment, I have not viewed any of the tutorials and just jumped in to work on my client's newsletter. With that said, I found some areas easy and some a bit cumbersome
Net Results is pretty easy to use and understand. I wouldn't say that it is the best in comparison to MailChimp's drag and drop email builder, but Net Results do so much more than MailChimp that it is hard to even compare the two. Overall Net Results has good usability
The system seemed quite slow sometimes. Specifically, there was sometimes a delay in sends if it was during a high traffic period. There were time-outs when uploading new code for an email, and a lag in reporting analytics which was sometimes as long as 72 hours
I think the overall support for Constant Contact has always been incredible; I have nothing negative to say. Our customer support representative was attentive, easy to understand, and very knowledgeable. I never felt like I wasn't a priority of his and my issues, while very small, were fixed in a very short time frame.
Implementation is very easy for someone who wants to send out the “batch and blast” type newsletters. If you want to use their templates with no customizations, the product works fine. However, the more customizations you get into involving link color, etc, that’s where things can get tricky for someone who may not be familiar with coding
We selected Constant Contact due to pricing constraints. However, if the pricing were to increase, we may look at alternative products that offer more features. We are looking for a product that will allow us to stand out from other organizations like ours that are appealing to the same customers—a product that will set our company apart from the others.
Net-Results is 10X more powerful than HubSpot, which to us was a basic marketing automation implementation that focused only on top of funnel acquisition. Net-Results is structured for the marketing automation power user whereas Pardot is structured for the generic marketing professional. Net-Results lacks in the enterprise level functionalities that Pardot has. But Net-Results excels in the flexibility and customizability of campaigns where Pardot is more limited in terms of how you can send and what you can send based on variables
Very reliable in sending email campaigns and controlling the recipients so that no contact is sent the same email more than once, even if they are on a resent list
I can't report hard numbers, however, being able to execute sales and marketing campaigns led to a noticeable increase in brand awareness in our industry.
We were able to offer white-labeled email communication services to clients, which is not something that other administrators typically offer. This helped us win and retain business.