Contentsquare vs. etracker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentsquare
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Contentsquare is a digital experience analytics cloud designed to help companies understand hidden customer behaviors, and use those insights to drive more successful experiences. It includes functionality from the former Clicktale heatmap, session recording, and A/B testing tool and now boasts a suite of customer journey analytic capabilities.N/A
etracker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
etracker is a web optimization solution.  The vendor says their customers use this solution for visitor statistics, usage analysis and gain information regarding visitor origin. This solution includes a set of website optimization tools that include: Web analysis and online marketing in real-time Satisfaction analysis through visitor surveys and feedback button Mouse tracking to uncover user experience obstacles App tracking for the assessment of the…N/A
Pricing
Contentsquareetracker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contentsquareetracker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contentsquareetracker
Considered Both Products
Contentsquare
Chose Contentsquare
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but …
Chose Contentsquare
ClickTale is now a step ahead of the competition since it delivers insights based on pre-defined business KPIs and customer journeys that we have set up. We can also segment our traffic and easily sift through the many recordings finding the ones that match our lookup criteria. …
Chose Contentsquare
The only other website analytical tool I have used is Google Analytics. They both have some overlap but Google Analytics is much more broad, while ClickTale focuses on what it does and provides tools and analysis to work within its area of expertise. When used together, more …
Chose Contentsquare
We used CrazyEgg prior to ClickTale. CrazyEgg is simpler to use and much less expensive, but you get what you pay for. ClickTale gives us more capabilities that we desired. If you are a small start up with few people dedicated to the web, go with CrazyEgg. If you are a larger …
Chose Contentsquare
Google in-page analytics- while it does many of the things Clicktale does and for free, it lacks the full featured offering that Clicktale provides. Mouse Recordings alone are worth it. They allow our new designers to watch and learn from real customers, then create solutions …
Chose Contentsquare
Tealeaf was way too expensive for us. ClickTale was a much more economical solution that still provides enterprise level service and quality!
etracker
Chose etracker
I like etracker better than Bound. I feel the UI and info are easier and cleaner.
Chose etracker
I used JIRA which is again a issue tracker system but it is not even close to what eTracker provides.
Features
Contentsquareetracker
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
etracker
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
9.7
Ratings
3% above category average
etracker
9.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Heatmap tool8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Scroll maps10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Session Recording and Replay10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
etracker
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
etracker
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contentsquareetracker
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Contentsquareetracker
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Contentsquareetracker
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited to businesses with a full time web analyst that will be using the tools to create actionable reports that drive action in the company. It is less appropriate where companies are just looking for some new tools and it will be forgotten soon after implementation. If a website is critical to your business and you have dedicated resources or consultants to help you understand the data, then it is invaluable. I love it.
Read full review
It is very helpful for a product development company as well as a software support team.
Read full review
Pros
  • The qualitative aspects of user experience are very well captured by ClickTale. We can get solid actionable insights through the various dashboards which track mouse movements, clicks, scrolls, etc.
  • The visual conversion funnels give a very good high level view of landing page performance and how they work together.
  • The video recordings are especially helpful. The user behavior captured is especially helpful in making decisions about user interface - form fields, call to actions, etc.
Read full review
  • Web analytics
  • Reporting
  • Comparing segment/parts
Read full review
Cons
  • Looking at isolated recordings without creating a segment, we still have to use the old interface
  • User interface has been massively improved but there are a few nags here and there that still need to be addressed
  • Mobile and desktop should be shown side by side and not separately
Read full review
  • Lesser fields to populate
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
Read full review
I would love to use and recommend this.
Read full review
Usability
I had some issues interacting with viewing recordings of a specific page by many users but my impression was that this was going to be fixed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
Read full review
I like etracker better than Bound. I feel the UI and info are easier and cleaner.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I learned how effective some of our image carousels were. How only 10% of a page visitors were being exposed to only the first slide. People were scrolling down or leaving the page without ever being exposed to 90% of the content. Once I provided this input to stakeholders it was an easy sell to redesign this aspect of the page.
  • I used the mouse-move heat map to analyze user interaction with the footer. Showing stakeholders the before and after redesign heat maps did wonders for improving my credibility as an usability analyst.
  • We used Clicktale to help analyze our 404 error page effectiveness. Our redesign gave us a 14% lower bounce rate on our redesigned 404 error page. Stakeholders appreciated a quantitative measure to gauge the success of that project.
Read full review
  • It gave us good insight into where people were going/clicking on website.
Read full review
ScreenShots