Contentsquare vs. Google Optimize

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentsquare
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Contentsquare is a digital experience analytics cloud designed to help companies understand hidden customer behaviors, and use those insights to drive more successful experiences. It includes functionality from the former Clicktale heatmap, session recording, and A/B testing tool and now boasts a suite of customer journey analytic capabilities.N/A
Google Optimize
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.N/A
Pricing
ContentsquareGoogle Optimize
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Google Optimize
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentsquareGoogle Optimize
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentsquareGoogle Optimize
Considered Both Products
Contentsquare
Chose Contentsquare
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but …
Chose Contentsquare
ClickTale is now a step ahead of the competition since it delivers insights based on pre-defined business KPIs and customer journeys that we have set up. We can also segment our traffic and easily sift through the many recordings finding the ones that match our lookup criteria. …
Chose Contentsquare
The only other website analytical tool I have used is Google Analytics. They both have some overlap but Google Analytics is much more broad, while ClickTale focuses on what it does and provides tools and analysis to work within its area of expertise. When used together, more …
Chose Contentsquare
We used CrazyEgg prior to ClickTale. CrazyEgg is simpler to use and much less expensive, but you get what you pay for. ClickTale gives us more capabilities that we desired. If you are a small start up with few people dedicated to the web, go with CrazyEgg. If you are a larger …
Chose Contentsquare
Google in-page analytics- while it does many of the things Clicktale does and for free, it lacks the full featured offering that Clicktale provides. Mouse Recordings alone are worth it. They allow our new designers to watch and learn from real customers, then create solutions …
Chose Contentsquare
Tealeaf was way too expensive for us. ClickTale was a much more economical solution that still provides enterprise level service and quality!
Google Optimize
Chose Google Optimize
We switched from Google Optimize to ab tasty which is a paid platform. Ab tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a …
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize 360 is expensive but definitely more accurate and reliable than the other simple tools out there.
Chose Google Optimize
Adobe Target is extremely powerful and provides features Google Optimize does not, but Adobe Target is also more expensive and harder to use. Google Optimize could benefit by offering basic built-in reporting so it doesn't require Google Analytics events.
Chose Google Optimize
We didn't use Optimizely very long as it fell out of budget due to complexity with the experiment setup.
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize is a great entry-level test platform and is an ideal solution for my clients that want something simple to start with and see value. Although not as robust as the paid platforms, it still does the job well and delivers believable data ties to one of the most …
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites …
Chose Google Optimize
Other products probably are more in-depth, but also cost more money and require technical resources to install.
Chose Google Optimize
To be very honest, we haven't used any software different from Optimize at this point. It would be irresponsible to write about alternatives that we don't know much about.
Features
ContentsquareGoogle Optimize
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Google Optimize
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
9.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Google Optimize
8.2
Ratings
2% below category average
Heatmap tool8.00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Scroll maps10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Session Recording and Replay10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
Google Optimize
4.9
Ratings
50% below category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings2.70 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings2.60 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
Google Optimize
7.0
Ratings
20% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ContentsquareGoogle Optimize
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentsquareGoogle Optimize
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentsquareGoogle Optimize
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited to businesses with a full time web analyst that will be using the tools to create actionable reports that drive action in the company. It is less appropriate where companies are just looking for some new tools and it will be forgotten soon after implementation. If a website is critical to your business and you have dedicated resources or consultants to help you understand the data, then it is invaluable. I love it.
Read full review
Google Optimize is well suited for testing small changes on the browser pages. You have the option of changing designs, texts, and some small features on the page. The audience can be divided using a long list of factors, so it makes it quite easy to set up the test. It is not well suited for complicated feature tests where you need to monitor the user over a long period or where the user is likely to use multiple sessions across multiple devices or browsers
Read full review
Pros
  • The qualitative aspects of user experience are very well captured by ClickTale. We can get solid actionable insights through the various dashboards which track mouse movements, clicks, scrolls, etc.
  • The visual conversion funnels give a very good high level view of landing page performance and how they work together.
  • The video recordings are especially helpful. The user behavior captured is especially helpful in making decisions about user interface - form fields, call to actions, etc.
Read full review
  • Easy test implementation. You're up and running once you've pinned down your hypothesis.
  • Goals and conversion points can be easily mapped to any test.
  • Customization of goals in case you don't have one setup.
  • Integrated with Google Analytics so you can correlate with other metrics under behavior and e-commerce data.
Read full review
Cons
  • Looking at isolated recordings without creating a segment, we still have to use the old interface
  • User interface has been massively improved but there are a few nags here and there that still need to be addressed
  • Mobile and desktop should be shown side by side and not separately
Read full review
  • Track site performance with each test version; see if the resource timing of each test has anything to do with conversion rates.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I had some issues interacting with viewing recordings of a specific page by many users but my impression was that this was going to be fixed.
Read full review
Google has always been known to make easy-to-use products. The Google Optimize interface is intuitive and easy to follow for anyone.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Google has well-documented resources and unlimited use cases that can be found online. Plus, their support is always helpful and available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
Read full review
We switched from Google Optimize to AB Tasty which is a paid platform. AB Tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a full programme running but this has now sunset so is no longer available.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I learned how effective some of our image carousels were. How only 10% of a page visitors were being exposed to only the first slide. People were scrolling down or leaving the page without ever being exposed to 90% of the content. Once I provided this input to stakeholders it was an easy sell to redesign this aspect of the page.
  • I used the mouse-move heat map to analyze user interaction with the footer. Showing stakeholders the before and after redesign heat maps did wonders for improving my credibility as an usability analyst.
  • We used Clicktale to help analyze our 404 error page effectiveness. Our redesign gave us a 14% lower bounce rate on our redesigned 404 error page. Stakeholders appreciated a quantitative measure to gauge the success of that project.
Read full review
  • Useful with clients on a budget who need to see ROI without another paid platform to install.
  • Setting up Google Optimize helps as an additional value add when bidding on projects.
  • Nothing negative unless a larger client needs a more robust package; then, there is always Google Optimize 360 as well as platforms from other vendors.
Read full review
ScreenShots