TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Contentsquare vs. Optimizely Web Experimentation

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contentsquare

83 Reviews and Ratings

Optimizely Web Experimentation

580 Reviews and Ratings

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Contentsquare

    Score6.9 out of 10
    		N/AContentsquare is a digital experience analytics cloud designed to help companies understand hidden customer behaviors, and use those insights to drive more successful experiences. It includes functionality from the former Clicktale heatmap, session recording, and A/B testing tool and now boasts a suite of customer journey analytic capabilities.N/A

    Optimizely Web Experimentation

    Score8.7 out of 10
    		N/AWhether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.N/A
    Pricing
    ContentsquareOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ContentsquareOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ContentsquareOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Considered Both Products
    Contentsquare
    No answer on this topic
    Optimizely
    Verified User
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you …
    Incentivized
    Olivia Hollerbach
    Senior Analsyt in Information Technology at PetSmart (Consumer Goods, 10,001+ employees)
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    It's a lot more, well, site stacked, it's way better than that. Adobe Target. I think the UI is easier to use on Optimizely. The one thing that I would say comparatively is our analytics talking to each other. Obviously Adobe, we use Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, so they …
    Incentivized
    Jason Tabert
    Manager, Experience Optimization in Marketing at Zillow (Real Estate, 5001-10,000 employees)
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Google Optimize was much less flexible for our program needs and requires Google Analytics for analysis and metrics tracking. Optimizely Web Experimentation lets you build any number of metrics which can be much more complex than standard GA goals. Optimizely Web …
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    We use heap and ClickTale but for different reasons. They don't do a/b test creation but they are great additions to analyzing your Optimizely tests.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely has loads more out of the box, such as heat mapping! And integrates with Demandbase great!
    Incentivized
    Jeremy Cox
    Business Analyst in Marketing at CLEARLINK (Marketing and Advertising, 501-1000 employees)
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    I was not part of the implementation. The decision to go with Optimizely was made before I began working here.
    Verified User
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optmizely is much more performant product. We have witnessed less issues with page performance on Optimizely and have no issues with flickering. We had these issues with Maxymiser.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ContentsquareOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Contentsquare and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Contentsquare and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare
    9.7
    1 Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.3
    138 Ratings
    Heatmap tool8.01 Ratings9.313 Ratings
    Click analytics10.01 Ratings8.833 Ratings
    Scroll maps10.01 Ratings8.517 Ratings
    Conversion tracking10.01 Ratings8.744 Ratings
    Goal tracking10.01 Ratings8.2117 Ratings
    Session Recording and Replay10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form fill analysis00 Ratings8.065 Ratings
    Test reporting00 Ratings7.9126 Ratings
    Results segmentation00 Ratings7.793 Ratings
    CSV export00 Ratings7.992 Ratings
    Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings8.049 Ratings
    Testing and Experimentation
    Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Contentsquare and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.0
    150 Ratings
    a/b experiment testing00 Ratings9.0150 Ratings
    Split URL testing00 Ratings8.5122 Ratings
    Multivariate testing00 Ratings8.4127 Ratings
    Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings7.9116 Ratings
    Cross-browser testing00 Ratings8.186 Ratings
    Mobile app testing00 Ratings8.066 Ratings
    Test significance00 Ratings8.4136 Ratings
    Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.2121 Ratings
    Advanced code editor00 Ratings8.0114 Ratings
    Page surveys00 Ratings6.217 Ratings
    Visitor recordings00 Ratings8.418 Ratings
    Preview mode00 Ratings7.6133 Ratings
    Test duration calculator00 Ratings7.9101 Ratings
    Experiment scheduler00 Ratings8.2101 Ratings
    Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings7.881 Ratings
    Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings7.565 Ratings
    Client-side tests00 Ratings7.888 Ratings
    Server-side tests00 Ratings7.244 Ratings
    Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings8.274 Ratings
    Audience Segmentation & Targeting
    Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Contentsquare and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Contentsquare
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.2
    142 Ratings
    Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings8.4137 Ratings
    Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings7.6113 Ratings
    Traffic allocation control00 Ratings9.1135 Ratings
    Website personalization00 Ratings7.8103 Ratings
    User Ratings
    ContentsquareOptimizely Web Experimentation
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (14 ratings)
    8.7
    (238 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.5
    (11 ratings)
    9.5
    (51 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (58 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (16 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (11 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (148 ratings)