Coveo Qubit vs. Luigi's Box

Coveo Qubit

Coveo Qubit

199 Reviews and Ratings

Luigi's Box

Luigi's Box

45 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Coveo Qubit	Score 7.4 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Qubit, now from Coveo (acquired October 2021) uses visitor history data to understand different user segments and serve personalized messages to segments using JavaScript. It is available as either a managed or self-service model. Data is collected using Qubit's own Universal Variable data model, or by integrating the user's existing model via our API. It combines quantitative data with qualitative visitor feedback to give Qubit users the ability to detect areas for optimization. Using…	N/A
Luigi's Box	Score 9.4 out of 10	N/A	Luigi’s Box solutions understand customer behavior, and use data to provide better search results, recommend relevant products, and enhance the shopping experience to boost your e-commerce conversion rates and average order values. Search and Autocomplete Recommender Product Listing Shopping Assistant Analytics	N/A

Pricing

Coveo Qubit

Luigi's Box

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Coveo Qubit	Luigi's Box
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Required

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Coveo Qubit	Luigi's Box
Considered Both Products	Coveo Qubit Marianna Satanas Vice President Ecommerce Chose Coveo Qubit In my previous company one of the brands was using Optimizely, while the brand I was working for was using Qubit. Qubit proved to be so much more than a multi-variant platform. It was much easier to use - we didn't have to rely on the tech team to implement tests. This way we … Incentivized Helpful? Kim Jacob Omni-Channel Programme Manager, Global Chose Coveo Qubit Key points that keep us close to Qubit are its knowledgeable resources, presentation and UI, ease of getting trained, ease of use, low time to market, analytics and reports. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit We're using Qubit as a fully managed testing platform, and their account management and level of service we've received from any other contact (technical, support, sales etc) was above any of their competitors. Integration and on-boarding was well done and we feel confident … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Having previously used Maxymiser around 3 years ago, I found their setup to be geared more away from faster moving retail. While tests would be thoroughly researched and built to a high standard, the length of time to turn around a single test was too long. Qubit has allowed us … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit As alternatives to Qubit, we considered: * Optimizely: more limited personalisation options, more expensive to be used across different sites. * Maxymiser: more expensive. Incentivized Helpful? Eduardo Barea AB Testing and Personalization Specialist Chose Coveo Qubit Qubit definitely beats Optimizely in terms of segmentation and personzalization. Regarding AB testing, both tools are quite similar. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit We've chosen Qubit because of the data driven approach, ease of use and the offered support. We like the ability to build some tests externally with the Qubit help. Incentivized Helpful? Neil Majithia Senior Business Analyst Chose Coveo Qubit At the time of taking the product, we found no comparable alternatives. Since then, the product has only grown from strength to strength, so it still does not have any comparable competitors that offer both the technical product and business knowledge that Qubit can. Google … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit We previously used Monetate but that was before my time so it's tough to specifically compare. However, I think the fact that we're no longer with Monetate proves that Qubit has been a better partner overall. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Simple usability is a controlled group testing only. Qubit on the other hand allows you to run a test on a live site with traffic ranging from 5% to 95% Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Qubit has a nicer UI than Google Tag Manager and offers the A/B testing that GTM doesn't - but for script management, there's not a lot to choose between them. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Qubit has stronger account management and business understanding Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit By far the most streamline of the programs. Incentivized Helpful? Bulat Yapparov Head of Analytics Chose Coveo Qubit Ability to deliver A/B tests via the UI which means that JavaScript development is not required. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Qubit is probably the most powerful tool that we reviewed. The challenge is that with the power comes a large responsibility to make sure you are doing it right and not having issues. With digital tools, power and complexity seem to go together so you have to make sure that you … Incentivized Helpful? Zach Shelley Manager of 360° Experience Chose Coveo Qubit I was not directly involved in the decision-making process but understand that overall functionality, data integration, and UX testing weighed against the cost of the solution were the deciding factors. Incentivized Helpful? Joe Dingley Senior Ecommerce Manager Chose Coveo Qubit Qubit was the first CRO tool we have used, and have stuck with it, even though we've tested other platforms on our other websites. I think it's a testament to Qubit and their staff that they are still implemented on our largest website. Incentivized Helpful? Art Bukowski UX designer // Web Project Manager Chose Coveo Qubit Customer support. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit I have not personally used anything similar to Qubit and I was not involved in the decision to use Qubit. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Maxymiser and Monetate Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Primarily the strength of Qubit's data layer and therefore the ability to personalise and create seamless user journeys for our different customer segments. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit The decision to use Qubit was made based on the capacity to run a 3 month test before committing for a longer term and down to a recommendation from a sister company. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit We were not aware of some of the other offerings from Qubit so I think this is an area that could be improved upon. For us, Qubit is seen as an A/B testing tool more than anything else so I would say that the promotion of additional tools offered by Qubit is certainty something … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit Our company decided to choose Qubit due to its perceived similarly to optimizely and promise infinite integrations through open tag. Sadly it didn't live up to its promise. The integrations were not integrations as most people would understand it. It was all very manual and you … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Coveo Qubit We opted for Qubit due to their personalisation features compared to the other market offering, as we felt their Visitor Cloud was a USP in the industry. The Visitor Cloud allows further personalisations, such as social proofs, to complement internal data we have gathered and … Incentivized Helpful?	Luigi's Box Verified User Anonymous Chose Luigi's Box The most important advantage was easier implementation, multiple configuration options and price.Competing solutions did not offer as much flexibility as Team Luigi's box. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Luigi's Box There is some not relevant competition, their product seems to be worse. I choose Luigi for better design. Incentivized Helpful? Wojciech Siebierański D2C Channel Poland Manager Chose Luigi's Box The choice of the tool was determined by the support of the sales and implementation team and the available functionalities. Incentivized Helpful? GO Grzegorz Okseniuk E-commerce Manager Chose Luigi's Box After analysis, we found that it is better optimized. Incentivized Helpful? KS Krystian Szewczyk head of ecommerce Chose Luigi's Box a better, personalized offer for the entire company, a transparent management panel Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Luigi's Box We chose it for the ease of implementation, the willingness of the staff and the quality results they have achieved so far. We read a lot of positive reviews about them, from which we learned that they really deliver what they promise. Real reviews are extremely important and … Incentivized Helpful? Tara Hunter Operations Manager Chose Luigi's Box In my opinion, Luigi's Box is superior. It was much easier to implement, customer service was better, the search results are much more accurate, the customization options are much more advanced, the analytics section is superior and the price for all of the tools that Luigi's … Incentivized Helpful? Gavin Hunter Director Chose Luigi's Box The price is a lot better than Clerk, and the speed of integration is much simpler. Our IT team had so many issues intergating Clerk and the price kept on increasing. Whereas with Luigi's Box it was the exact opposite. Price is good for the system you receive and the … Incentivized Helpful? Bartosz Bielawski Business Analyst Chose Luigi's Box The software is significantly faster and cheaper than your own Elasticsearch implementation, and in tests it proved better than Prefixbox Incentivized Helpful? Ľuboš Baran Branch manager Chose Luigi's Box Unfortunately, I did not have an opportunity to test and compare other similar Solutions. Before implementing Luigis box we developed our on site search module but we struggled with good results. Our search results significantly got better and also revenues from on site search … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Luigi's Box Luigi's Box offers a sweet spot between functionalities and price. While implementation was somewhat lengthy the usability is more important as you would stay with the solution for longer time. And this is where Luigi's Box excels as it's very intuitive and easy to work with. … Incentivized Helpful? Dominika Bieliková Online specialist Chose Luigi's Box It was bought by the company even before I worked there. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Luigi's Box I have no other experience with other applications Incentivized Helpful? Zoltán Szabó Shopmanagement Teamleader Chose Luigi's Box As Luigi's Box is a slovak company as well as ours, we had better negotiating options and we managed to negotiate a better price. We also consider Luigi's Box as a tool that is one of the easiest to implement. Regarding features, there were not any big differences. We were also … Incentivized Helpful? TR Tomas Rais Internet shop administrator Chose Luigi's Box We had really good references for Luigi's Box so we barely considered any other option or alternative. I must say that we do not regret so far. Mostly because the implementation was fast and easy and thanks to self learning algorithm, Luigi's Box needs minimum maintenance. The … Incentivized Helpful? Michal Pekarcik Group Conversion Rate Optimization Expert Chose Luigi's Box Luigi's Box is much easier to set up and maintain. Most features are ready to go without the need to study extensive documentation or do additional training. It does not allow you the flexibility to change EVERYTHING right away. Incentivized Helpful? MD Matej Drazdik Sales representative Chose Luigi's Box we chose Luigi's Box because we had a problem with searching for products on our website. Luigi's Box solved this problem and we are extremely satisfied with it. The number of orders has increased and we still only have positive reactions to Luigi's Box from employees and also … Incentivized Helpful? MR Matej Roder Project and product manager Chose Luigi's Box First we were deciding between Algolia and Luigi's Box. They are leaders on the ,,search,, market. We test them both against each other and against our engine. Luigi's Box was the winner and by far the price was better then Algolia for sure. We made a great decision in the long … Incentivized Helpful? Jan Slovacek Co-founder Chose Luigi's Box We used an in-house system which couldn't handle large amounts of data. Luckily, we quickly found Luigi's Box and didn't need to try any other systems. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Luigi's Box Cost effective Incentivized Helpful? Julie Huet E-commerce senior manager Chose Luigi's Box Better technical support and more relevant product proposals Incentivized Helpful? Frédéric Gomes Founder Chose Luigi's Box Better pricing, better analytics, better support. Incentivized Helpful? Peter Mažec Project manager Chose Luigi's Box Easier to implement and use in daily, the search engine is faster and better, to be honest is the best. We have one solution for recommenders, searching, and listings. We managed to agree to favorable contract terms + Communication with tool support is perfect. We have solved … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Luigi's Box I got recommended Luigi's Box by multiple people from the network and also was remarketed by their ads quite a lot so they were organically my first pick when it comes to such a tool. Other solutions on the market seemed quite old-fashioned and mostly didn´t have the specific … Incentivized Helpful? Martin Poduska UX Writer Chose Luigi's Box It's a huge improvement over our in-house solution Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Coveo Qubit	Luigi's Box
Small Businesses	Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization Score 8.6 out of 10	Yext Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10	Guru Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises	Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10	Guru Score 9.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Coveo Qubit	Luigi's Box
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	9.4 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	7.1 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Availability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	6.8 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
In-Person Training	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	7.4 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	8.7 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	7.6 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Coveo Qubit	Luigi's Box
Likelihood to Recommend	Coveo Qubit is a very helpful platform mainly for organizations that need to provide a solid business model before carrying out any implementation or new functionality. In addition, it is a very good tool to generate changes and show different content to different types of clients, with their personalization and segmentation criteria.It is ideal for simultaneous testing and customization, only one of these activities individually is not recommended. Incentivized Victor Ramirez Benitez Sales Support Team Leader Arg Read full review	Luigi's Box is the perfect solution for sales platforms that have search engine problems on their site. Luigi's Box allows you to go to the next level and enable customers to find what they are looking for. With additional options to recommend and indicate substitutes and add-on products, it can work great as a sales-boosting element. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	The testing platform itself is continually evolving. This means that we are always able to try new ideas as well as quickly and efficiently put others into practice. The beta programme and the additional functionality products are both exciting to see as well as ensuring we can cherry pick the functionality we need. This means that we don't end up paying for functionality we don't need Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wide access to the analysis panel that supports sales and helps analyze user behavior. Adapting functionality to the partner's needs, which confirms the flexibility of the tool. The boost function which allows us to prioritise showing customers certain products over others, which improves conversions. Incentivized Wojciech Siebierański D2C Channel Poland Manager Read full review
Cons	Some of the reporting within Qubit has been overly simplified in the past, a point they are continually addressing. At times the syntax of experience (test) creation can be specific to Qubit and so there is a slight learning curve for developers. Unless developers have much time to allocate to creating tests in Qubit, marketers may potentially find simple tests limited. I would recommend having someone in-house as we do. Incentivized Gideon Caspi Web Manager Read full review	More choice for customisation and layout would be good. More payment options for example the choice to pay via direct debit. BO Beth O'dell Customer Service Manager Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Qubit helps out immensely and lays out in plain English the profitability of each of our A-B tests. Say Qubit has provided us overall with a 5% profit increase this year (that is a completely arbitrary figure for illustration only), then if we didn't renew it could be seen as us taking a 5% loss as Qubit wouldn't be there. The results of our tests are showing no slowing down and as Qubit and Toast grow to understand each other better we can only see our performance getting better as the years go on. James Morris Web Developer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Overall navigation on Qubit is very user friendly and requires a minimal training to be up and running. Be it reviewing existing experiences or setting up new experiences, the process is pretty simple for business user. Add some basic development skills to your kitty, you can do magic with Qubit and make your website do wonders! Incentivized Kim Jacob Omni-Channel Programme Manager, Global Read full review	Luigi's Box just slots in nicely to the website with very little code and has no negative impact on pagespeed scores. Having been using it for a number of months now, we have had no bugs or downtime. The search functionality works for every customer and even our staff use it every day to get to the product they want faster. Incentivized Gavin Hunter Director Read full review
Reliability and Availability	I would say that the Qubit account managers are always available for any request. We have a lot of different promotions that could always do with last minute optimizing or changes and Qubit can be relied on to get this changes up and running in an impressive amount of time, so that we don't need to patch live or wait for the next IT sprint. Invaluable to our business. Miriam Isaac UX Design Lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	Technology is good for A/B testing and personalisation - allowing any team with a dedicated developer to create test relatively easily and to report/analyse them in a fair amount of details. Some advanced features, especially on the set up of test cells, are dearly missing. Unfortunately, new features are often not free of bugs... Also, support is sub-par, which means new features are realised without proper documentation, example or training (but of our Qubit counterparts and internally). Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Qubit are supportive and flexible in providing support. They are happy working out of usual hours, even on weekends and if I have any doubts about the set up of an experience they’re quick to respond and willing to check my work. On particularly big revenue days they monitor our account and they’re quick to identify and problem solve any issues. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Their support is excellent. Quick and helpful. Michal Pekarcik Group Conversion Rate Optimization Expert Read full review
In-Person Training	The training was great, but would be great to have a script or PDF with some explanations of the qubit JS layer. Without the script you can just try to learn on your own, so the training is not as powerfull as it could be. On the other hand - would be great to have training related to reading statistics or personalisation. Incentivized Art Bukowski UX designer // Web Project Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	Implementation couldn't be easier. All we needed to do was insert the tag. (easy) and set up the data layer. (dev required) This was pretty smooth in comparison to some of the other tools we use on our site, and was done in less than a day. Note : Data needs to be collected for a set period of time before you can accurately rely on the data that you are receiving. This is normal though with everyone else that we have used Incentivized Joe Dingley Senior Ecommerce Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	We're using Qubit as a fully managed testing platform, and their account management and level of service we've received from any other contact (technical, support, sales etc) was above any of their competitors. Integration and on-boarding was well done and we feel confident that the campaigns are developed and tested thoroughly. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	In my opinion, Luigi's Box is superior. It was much easier to implement, customer service was better, the search results are much more accurate, the customization options are much more advanced, the analytics section is superior and the price for all of the tools that Luigi's Box has to offer is extremely reasonable. We did also try to build our own product in house, but this proved very difficult and complicated to get the results we wanted. Tara Hunter Operations Manager Read full review
Scalability	Our requirements change throughout the year like most E Commerce retailers. At Christmas and Peak we're dealing with around ten times the usual traffic on the site. Qubit had no problems with this at all, tests continued to fire, and stats were still reported accurately. I don't think that it is the most server intensive .js anyway, but we have seen no issues at all. Incentivized Joe Dingley Senior Ecommerce Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Faster recognition of customer needs - finding out exactly what customers are doing when they come on site. Assessment of online assets for effectiveness and improvements - facilitated the analysis of 500 online feedback questionnaires for a campaign. Mapping out lead conversion and helping identify opportunities to improve it. Dennis Wildman Campaign Manager Read full review	Reduction in the number of abandoned carts - since the launch of the service, we have seen a drop in cart abandonment by more than 10% Lower reports of product search problems from customers Analytical accounts - they were able to recommend many things to us and improve services Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Coveo Qubit Screenshots	Luigi's Box Screenshots