Qubit, now from Coveo (acquired October 2021) uses visitor history data to understand different user segments and serve personalized messages to segments using JavaScript. It is available as either a managed or self-service model. Data is collected using Qubit's own Universal Variable data model, or by integrating the user's existing model via our API. It combines quantitative data with qualitative visitor feedback to give Qubit users the ability to detect areas for optimization.
Using…
N/A
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Score8.7 out of 10
N/A
Whether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.
Vice President Ecommerce in Corporate at alice + olivia (Apparel & Fashion, 201-500 employees)
Chose Coveo Qubit
In my previous company one of the brands was using Optimizely, while the brand I was working for was using Qubit. Qubit proved to be so much more than a multi-variant platform. It was much easier to use - we didn't have to rely on the tech team to implement tests. This way we …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
We're using Qubit as a fully managed testing platform, and their account management and level of service we've received from any other contact (technical, support, sales etc) was above any of their competitors. Integration and on-boarding was well done and we feel confident …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
As alternatives to Qubit, we considered: * Optimizely: more limited personalisation options, more expensive to be used across different sites. * Maxymiser: more expensive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
We've chosen Qubit because of the data driven approach, ease of use and the offered support. We like the ability to build some tests externally with the Qubit help.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
Our company decided to choose Qubit due to its perceived similarly to Optimizely and promise infinite integrations through open tag. Sadly it didn't live up to its promise. The integrations were not integrations as most people would understand it. It was all very manual and you …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
We chose qubit because of the data they capture on our users. Presumably, we can use that data to segment our audiences and significantly improve conversion rates - we're just starting to do that now. Most of our success with qubit has been on the acquisition side, testing …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
No we have other data point solutions in place (Tealium)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
The decision to use Qubit was based on a combination of factors including cost, previous relationships and account management fit.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Senior UI/Front-End Developer at Blue Acorn (Internet, 51-200 employees)
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit is a great choice for A/B testing where advanced JavaScript capabilities are required. This is especially true for large "legacy" sites that have a ton of on-site JavaScript that has culminated over years, often overriding changes made in a WYSIWYG or "basic mode" editor …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
UX Manager in Information Technology at Chain Reaction Cycles (Sporting Goods, 501-1000 employees)
Chose Coveo Qubit
The decision to proceed with Qubit over other products was because of strengths on sample size and statistical significance of test results. The expertise, professionalism and enthusiam of their consultants and strategists was also a factor.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
We went with Qubit because we needed to leverage their full service tech team. We had scarce resources to complete the technical side of A/B testing and it was an area we felt they excelled. And they did. It was extremely helpful. On the tests that worked and proved to have …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit was already in place when I joined the company, however I understand that the managed solution and consultation played a big part in the decision.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Manager II, Digital Commerce Operations in Marketing at 1-800 CONTACTS (Consumer Goods, 501-1000 employees)
Chose Coveo Qubit
We chose to add Qubit to our suite of testing platforms based on their ability to reduce our reliance on internal resources. While other products provided professional services, Qubit's offering felt more strongly geared toward an organization that needed to produce many tests …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Coveo Qubit
The level of detail and complexity that can be achieved with the tool.