Covercy vs. Progress ShareFile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Covercy
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Covercy is a Banking-Embedded Investment Management Platform built for commercial real estate investment firms. It offers automated distribution & capital call payment processing, an Investor Portal, and APY yielding checking accounts.N/A
Progress ShareFile
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011.
$17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Pricing
CovercyProgress ShareFile
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Advanced
$17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Premium
$27.50
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Industry Advantage
$45.83
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Virtual Data Room
$75.00
per month per user (minimum 5 users)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CovercyProgress ShareFile
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CovercyProgress ShareFile
Considered Both Products
Covercy
Chose Covercy
2 other platforms. I would say that it is the personal care, [...] and [...] and attention that tips it to Covercy.
Chose Covercy
Juniper Square is the No. 1 option for institutional developers and investors. Since we don't have hundreds of millions of dollars in AUM, we chose Covercy since it was largely the same and more affordable.
Chose Covercy
We've only used one other portal. There are features that I liked about the other platform. Most of which, I've already stated. Investors can add their own profile information. Being able to send emails with attachments. Covercy has better customer service. Your doc signing is …
Chose Covercy
I think Covercy is easier to use and more engaging tech for investors than Juniper Square.
Chose Covercy
Covercy is much more user-friendly than Juniper Square.
Chose Covercy
We have utilized Syndication Pro and it is a night and day difference between the two. The most noticeable is the investor portal where the ease of use and the information that is readily accessible to the investor makes it a much better overall user experience. This alone was …
Chose Covercy
We selected Covercy for the price mainly.
Chose Covercy
Most of them provide similar functions, but for me it was a matter of simplicity and cost. Covercy makes the most sense for our team and for our investors. The lighter our spend, the lighter our fees can be.
Chose Covercy
Covercy was better suited for our needs. More customizable solutions and a more intuitive platform. AppFolio is our PM software and even despite this (at a similar price point) we chose Covercy.
Chose Covercy
Covercy is cheaper and the functionality is on par, if not better than Juniper Square.
Chose Covercy
Covery seemed to have the lowest administrative fees and is one of the only companies that allows transfers originating in Israel to western countries.
Chose Covercy
I believe that Covercy is the only solution that is currently allowing Real Estate firms to distribute funds to their investors directly through the platform. Also, both other solutions are pretty expensive compared to the reasonable pricing that Covercy has in place (function …
Chose Covercy
I don't remember the names of the other products we looked at, but Covercy was much more cost-effective than the other 3-4 products we demoed and offered a more holistic service.
Progress ShareFile
Chose Progress ShareFile
ShareFile offers more professional level services, and doesn't constantly "run out" of space, forcing you to upgrade to continue. When doing a cost comparison, the competitors may seem cheaper at first, but by the time you add on the features to make it comparable, the pricing …
Chose Progress ShareFile
The ability to learn how to access, store, share, and retrieve documents is simpler than in other applications, and that is what keeps me in the application. Even though my Microsoft 365 professional and Adobe Acrobat Pro applications, which I currently subscribe to, include …
Chose Progress ShareFile
Dropbox and others like Mega is are open to anyone and when they leave your company they take those documents with them. ShareFile give secure sharing but you keep control of your documents. ShareFile also offers other tools like Outlook plug-ins and windows mapping tools.
Chose Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is cheaper, but I think Box had more user friendly features
Chose Progress ShareFile
DocuSign did not allow me to save directly to a client folder. ShareFile will allow this, and it cut out having to move or download the file then store it in a client folder. We used that along with Dropbox. Dropbox did not allow us to seamlessly see who had access to what …
Chose Progress ShareFile
I use ShareFile because it is simple and offers easy use of esignatures - and unlimited. Docusign is getting expensive and charges often on a per "envelope" basis which doesn't work for me.
Chose Progress ShareFile
Ease of use, cost and proficiency is above and beyond what other products offer. Customer service is down to earth, and you feel like your concerns are addressed appropriately.
Chose Progress ShareFile
I chose to stick with ShareFile because of the signature certificate feature that is included with the software. The two programs are both relativley easy for me to use, but Adobe Acrobat does not have this feature included. Additionally, ShareFile can be opened in Browser and …
Chose Progress ShareFile
The ShareFile website never broke, so we switched the signature service to this platform too. Because in PandaDoc sometimes it was hard to find some signed documents from years ago, also we couldn't find an efficient way to order the signature documents for each client, but …
Chose Progress ShareFile
A lot more user friendly and less phone calls for assistance which make the purpose of smooth electronic communication a great thing. I like that it doesn't require 1 person to sign before the other person can and that we are notified separately once each person signs required …
Chose Progress ShareFile
The large file size for uploading and downloading documents was the one thing that the others just couldn't compare to.
Chose Progress ShareFile
Other platforms allow you to share information but without the security and confirmation guarantees that ShareFile offers. Although they provide fewer features, they are often less intuitive and less easy to work with. To date we do not consider trying other options, as we do …
Chose Progress ShareFile
We have one consulting engineer that uses MS Sharepoint. We find it comparable to ShareFile, but see no particular advantage to it over ShareFile. We don't really know a lot about it, or what it costs to use.
Chose Progress ShareFile
I think Dropbox is a plague to the world of cloud storage. It sucks. ShareFile doesn't suck.
Chose Progress ShareFile
For an organization that requires reliable security when sending sensitive data, ShareFile is the application to use. ShareFile has multiple features to ensure that the right information is being sent with the file so the end receiver has the pertinent information when the file …
Chose Progress ShareFile
I like ShareFile much better than Mango Practice Management. I think the navigation is much more intuitive and user-friendly.
Chose Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is better and easier to use than other products (i.e. SmartVault). I love ShareFile's ability to set up new clients easily. Their customer service is excellent as well. For any accounting firm, this is a great tool to have. Do not hesitate, you will not regret it. I …
Chose Progress ShareFile
Citrix RightSignature meets the needs of our business better than DocuSign. It also has an awesome interface that lets me keep track of pending documents and integrate with our webform on our website. Along with the e-signature features it offers best encryption. Also, customer …
Chose Progress ShareFile
DocuSign is well known and accepted and recognized in the industry overall but a subscription is needed for full usage
Chose Progress ShareFile
I haven't used any other products yet.
Chose Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is easier and does what you need. I have moved a few organizations from SharePoint to ShareFile. Just easier. You can setup different areas for different departments, setup their permissions and it is easy enough for them to do what they want in their zones. The …
Chose Progress ShareFile
First and foremost we are both a Citrix and Microsoft partner so we will always recommend their products. 3 years ago we found ShareFile's biggest selling point was the ease of setup, administration, and ease of use while still being an enterprise-grade product. We also enjoyed …
Features
CovercyProgress ShareFile
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Covercy
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
File search00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
Covercy
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
9.5
Ratings
9% above category average
User and role management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
File organization00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Device management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
Covercy
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
6.3
Ratings
30% below category average
Performance00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Reliability00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Storage Reports00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CovercyProgress ShareFile
Small Businesses
Dropbox DocSend
Dropbox DocSend
Score 9.6 out of 10
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 5.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dropbox DocSend
Dropbox DocSend
Score 9.6 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
S&P Capital IQ
S&P Capital IQ
Score 8.2 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CovercyProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CovercyProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
Covercy has been the ultimate Investor Portal that we have utilized as an organization thus far. From the outstanding customer service that we continue to see, to the ease of use that the software provides both for our investors and us on the back end make it a no-brainer for continuing to partner together.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile has been a great tool for sharing files. When you send to outside people they get an easy link to click on to download the needed files. On the sender side you get options to have the person do things logon to get the file, just enter a name and email address, or just click on the link and download. There are hooks to use other tools to scan for personal information like SSN or credit card numbers. Many of our users use email to send and store emails. They have found that clicking on a link to get a file adds a bit of complexity but many have learned how to adjust to the change.
Read full review
Pros
  • $3 Million in FDIC Insurance Account protection is unsurpassed and highly attractive to our project managers and investors.
  • The Onboarding of over 100 investors was simple and efficient using a spreadsheet import.
  • The Technical Staff was very helpful and supportive during our startup phase and handled project startup delays beautifully.
  • Covercy was able to handle member payouts that involved compilcated and varied bonus structures and 15 different income generating assets with varied investor contributors and we had great support in figuring out how to handle the profit distributions.
  • The Covercy Account Managers were highly professional and a pleasure to work with.
Read full review
  • I think that one of ShareFile's greatest strengths is its ease of use. With the outlook plug-in sharing large documents is so quick and easy.
  • I also like the security and control that is provided for who can access the documents and tracking the changes within them. I think it does well at protecting information that leaves the company.
  • I also think the website is well organized and easy to use. It was very easy for us to implement and train our employees on the proper use of the website and software.
Read full review
Cons
  • We need our investors to log in and see what offerings they are invested in.
  • There is no way to add documents/photos in an organized manner.
  • As a debt fund, we want to be able to showcase our offerings to our LP Portals.
Read full review
  • Users grow quickly (each client gets a separate account). Automated pruning would be nice.
  • I'm not aware of integration with Office365 online (only the outlook app). This could make it harder for some users.
  • It would be nice to have something that auto-scans emails and attachments for PII and would require Sharefile for those emails.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It's a highly effective and secure storage system, has robust workarounds for serving the various equipment limits of our users, meets high security requirements of HIPAA standards, significantly reduces our needs for producing paper trails.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Some of the clunkiness in the user interface and the processing of documents could be made more seamless. However, once you get over that learning curve, it's straightforward enough. The API for integrating external systems is well documented, and the support crew is great at getting you over the rough spots. There's nothing bad about their system, just a few things I thought could be more elegant.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Covercy's customer service team has been responsive when we call-in asking about features that were not present at the on-boarding stage. They appreciated our feedback and made improvements to the portal that were helpful to our investors. We had a client service rep that we could call and was responsive.
Read full review
The software has never been down when I needed to use it.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Easy to use, easy to integrate with Outlook. I only gave it a 9 because I have found that sometimes it does not play nicely with Outlook and can slow it down. But, when that happens (not frequent), I restart Outlook and all is well again
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Typically the support is very knowledgeable and interested in following an issue until it is fully resolved. I have not had any issues working with their staff as they are all polite and easy to communicate with. If the first or second level tech does not fix the concern then it is escalated until we get to someone who can close the case.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Good documentation for the API. With a little help from RS tech staff, any competent programmer should be able to integrate RightSignature with an existing system in a week or three. That help is easy to get as well
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We've only used one other portal. There are features that I liked about the other platform. Most of which, I've already stated. Investors can add their own profile information. Being able to send emails with attachments. Covercy has better customer service. Your doc signing is better and works all the time vs the other, not working most of the time. The other platform had more sender fields available, which was a better investor experience
Read full review
ShareFile offers more professional level services, and doesn't constantly "run out" of space, forcing you to upgrade to continue. When doing a cost comparison, the competitors may seem cheaper at first, but by the time you add on the features to make it comparable, the pricing is as much, if not more, than what we're paying for ShareFile. The access control level is better with ShareFile, so we chose to stay with them.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I am a one person office. I have no idea how this software would scale to a larger office.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The ROI I can provide is for time management. It saves us at least 2 days' worth of work each quarter on capital distributions alone, and at least 30 minutes on each report distribution. Not to mention the amount of time it saves us on fielding client questions regarding their capital because they can just log in and see everything on their portal.
Read full review
  • All of our clients and consulting engineers find ShareFile easy to use, thus complementing our business.
  • Our staff also find ShareFile intuitive, accessible, and easy to use, making it an ideal, everyday indispensable desktop tool for everyone in our company.
  • ShareFile can be linked to our firm's primary website as a placed for private use. We haven't found need for this yet, but might in the future.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Progress ShareFile Screenshots

Screenshot of the ShareFile dashboardScreenshot of ShareFile's Outlook PluginScreenshot of the Projects interfaceScreenshot of ShareFile's link sharing optionsScreenshot of ShareFile's e-signature