TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CyberArk Workforce Identity vs. Okta

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CyberArk Workforce Identity

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ACyberArk Identity is a SaaS-delivered suite of solutions designed to simplify identity and access management in enterprises. CyberArk Identity unifies Workforce Access and Identity Management solutions in a single offering. Workforce Access capabilities include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, session security, and credential management. Identity Management capabilities include lifecycle management, identity orchestration, and identity governance. With CyberArk Identity,…N/A

    Okta

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOkta is an enterprise grade identity management service, built in the cloud. IT can manage access across any application, person or device. Whether the people are employees, partners or customers or whether the applications are in the cloud, on premises or on a mobile device, Okta helps IT become more secure and maintain compliance. The Okta service provides directory services, single sign-on, authentication, provisioning, workflow, and built in reporting. ment systems.

    $2

    Per User Per Month

    Pricing
    CyberArk Workforce IdentityOkta
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Single Sign on
    $2.00
    Per User Per Month
    Multi Factor Authentication
    $3.00
    Per User Per Month
    Single Sign on Adaptive
    $5.00
    Per User Per Month
    Multi Factor Authentication Adaptive
    $6.00
    Per User Per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CyberArk Workforce IdentityOkta
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Browse products and price points that make the most sense for your organization on the Okta website.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CyberArk Workforce IdentityOkta
    Considered Both Products
    Cyberark
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    We reviewed Okta and OneLogin while looking at Centrify for our ticketing solution SSO partner. When doing so we looked at it from the aspect of if we wanted to roll this out where we could see the use cases for it and initially it would be in a couple departments then branch …
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    We started off using ADFS from Microsoft, which took most of a day to get fully functional and nearly a week to get fully optimized. The documentation was inconsistent with ADFS and there was no real support without opening a Microsoft Premier Support ticket. At the time, if …
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    Okta has no Mac management
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    OneLogin and Okta provide similar experiences, but OneLogin is less mature than Centrify. Their Mac and Windows management suites are still in a beta phase are cannot be deployed en masse to our user base. Okta is more expensive and does not have the security compliance. …
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    Centrify offered us more for our money by being more than just an SSO platform. There were several other features included such as MDM and MFA. This started other initiatives for us and felt the other solutions we evaluated would not have been able to provide.
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    Centrify provided both SSO support as well as Mac support; we needed both. Other products had one or the other, but not both.

    This made choosing Centrify a no-brainer as we didn't have to have a wide variety of integrations to do and vendors to manage.
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    I think they are quite similar and don't have enough knowledge about one over another.
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    Seemed to be the best in breed and the one with deeper Mac integration on the short roadmap. As an Apple Distinguished School, this is obviously very critical to us. Very easy to set up and it has a deep pre-canned application pool for already deployed apps. Very easy for …
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity

    During our evaluation process, Centrify could show in the PoC that they are very flexible and open minded to our ideas. An application integration which was not part of the product catalog has been integrated for free. Furthermore the whole package compared to the …

    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    Centrify's pricing was much better than their competitors. They also offered a better sign-in/multi-factor experience for our users when doing pilot testing. Their product also included other features like Mobile Device Management that was a nice add-on.
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    Centrify offers many more features and much better control.
    Incentivized
    Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
    To be honest, all four products were fairly similar in much of the architecture and functionality. We found that Centrify offered a bit more in terms of user acceptance, ease of administration, reporting and MDM capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Okta
    Chose Okta
    I selected Okta for its robustness of product as well as the clear record of security breaches, which some of its competitors do not have. Ease of use and reliability of the product are things that are unmatched by its competitors.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta has more robust support for Office 365 than Centrify (which we previously used), and it is easier to configure and administrate. It is cloud-based and easier to manage than Microsoft ADFS. It is similar to OneLogin and Ping but we've found the pricing and support options …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta single sign-on provided better functionality with a higher variety of directory integration that was important for our particular organization with multiple user directories being accessed by various departments.
    Cost was another factor for our selection as some other …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Centrify solves several problems in our organization. First, it helps improve our security by creating a secure, easy to use user authentication service across applications that would have previously required separate login credentials. RSA- In a corporate setting I feel this …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    We had an investment in Okta already, but we did look at Centrify. While Centrify is nice and capable, there wasn't enough reason to change solutions.
    Chose Okta
    Okta is more easier to handle than CyberArk. The webpage is more understandable.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    CyberArk Workforce IdentityOkta
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of CyberArk Workforce Identity and Okta
    Feature
    CyberArk Workforce Identity
    9.0
    3 Ratings
    Okta
    9.0
    124 Ratings
    ID-Management Access Control9.03 Ratings9.4114 Ratings
    ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.02 Ratings9.3123 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication9.02 Ratings8.8119 Ratings
    Password Management9.02 Ratings8.3114 Ratings
    Account Provisioning and De-provisioning9.03 Ratings9.3103 Ratings
    ID Management Workflow Automation9.03 Ratings9.095 Ratings
    ID Risk Management9.03 Ratings8.890 Ratings
    User Ratings
    CyberArk Workforce IdentityOkta
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (43 ratings)
    8.7
    (166 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (12 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)