TruBot RPA tool is an enterprise grade, multi-skilled bot programmed to enhance enterprise productivity. It automates a range of simple as well as complex processes. The vendor states that with TruBot RPA, even a business user with absolutely no programming knowledge, can design bots with click of a button. TruBot also comes with an intelligent data capture solution,
N/A
Nintex
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Nintex offers a platform that helps companies discover, automate, and optimize business processes.
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Pricing
Datamatics TruBot
Nintex
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise - Process Platform
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Professional - Process Platform
150,000
per year
Expert - Process Platform
185,000
per year
Custom
Personalized Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Datamatics TruBot
Nintex
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Datamatics TruBot
Nintex
Considered Both Products
Datamatics TruBot
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Datamatics TruBot
Datamatics RPA TruBot is cost-wise and product-wise much easier to use. I have realized that it gives user experience, too. Support from Datamatics is also good. The regular webinars and trials and demo also help Datamatics to increase the knowledge base and perform better …
TruBot has the best Document Character Recognition Processors. The Artificial Intelligence feature can detect minor variations of a scanned signature in any document and verify the authenticity and then run the Workflow. TruBot can also verify Digital Signatures in PDF …
More than the product, it is the service that they offer
that stands out. There are also multiple trainings available for making the
best use of the tool in different scenarios. The SMEs that helped us were very
RPA TruBot is a very effective tool. It helps increase the productivity of organizations. With the help of automation, we can manage documentation easily. The robotic process of automation helps us convert raw data into standard format data and perform data validation using …
The [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more simple and easy to understand for a nontechnical person as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. Also, [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more cost-effective and provides better support as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. [Datamatics] RPA …
[Kofax RPA's] user interface is somewhat extensive and complex. We believe it does not offer correct or direct information for a due understanding to achieve a more coherent and legible performance. It leaves emblems to know what this system is dedicated to, meaning that its …
We selected Nintex because Process Manager is a purpose designed platform for knowledge management. However, what we discovered is that there are significant limitations, which has lead us to now explore developing a knowledge management platoform in sharepoint. this is a much …
Microsoft environment does not have the scalability of Nintex; it is perfect for small and medium-sized companies, especially in environments where Microsoft environment is almost entirely used. Although Microsoft offers options to connect to other applications, its platform …
Nintex Process Platform is a great tool for automatic tasks and creating forms in SharePoint Online. For automating using other applications, including third party, Power Automate has more usage.
Xmind was great for mind mapping, but when I tried to use it as a process mapper, I found it was rather lacking. It has its uses, but process mapping (at least for us in our stage and phase of mapping) was not up to the task, unfortunately. We didn't have any other software we …
We use Outsystems for other processes in our operation but we see that this platform is not able to indentify processes when drawed. Besides that OutSystems requires some basic development knowledge to use it. This makes it not really useable for business units.
Nintex workflows has much complex process management tools and better integration tools than Microsoft Power Platform. Being able to host it on premises is also an important feature for companies that are not cloud fans.
Nintex was selected because it was somewhat unique in its capabilities and depth/breadth of ability 7+ years ago. However, the competition has now caught up and pricing is a significant factor in whether we continue to use Nintex going forward.
Nintex Process Platform was and still is by far the most flexible and easy-to-use than any of the other form creation and workflow designer apps we looked at.
It's much more reasonably priced and we were able to actually experience the platform for a bit before we made a decision. And by the time our demo was finished we had already started depending on it for some of our processes so it would've been very hard to separate from it.
We use Microsoft Power Automate as well in our organization but used Nintex Automation Cloud workflows for most of the automation workflows because NWC is low code solution to develop automation workflows for SharePoint, integrate well with Microsoft teams, better designer tool …
We are using Nintex for SharePoint 2016 forms and workflows only for all kinds of automation. It has the following benefits over others. It is faster than working with the old SharePoint Designer and its
textual design or Visual Studio with coding. Less complex workflow can
Best suited for: 1. Processing complex, bulk and multiple source of data 2. working with SQL Database 3. Automating any web browser based activities Not appropriate: 1. Automation of mMacro based excel utilities
The Nintex K2 platform is not only efficient and developer-friendly, but the support provided by the vendor is also highly commendable. The platform's ease of use and robust functionality make it a preferred choice for developers, while the vendor's exceptional support ensures smooth implementation and ongoing assistance, enhancing overall user satisfaction.
The price is little more than other leading tools in the market.
Everyone should complete the training provided on the company website and then start implementing.
Something that I do not like at all about this tool and I would like it to be restructured is the registration dynamics in the different services they offer.
Difficult to fix flows that are in process (such as re-assigning a task for someone that is OOO or has left the company).
Nintex support team does not have resolution SLAs (only acknowledgment SLAs). Occasionally this has led to key issues taking weeks to resolve.
The number of integrations available is impressive, however, sometimes key methods are not available within an integration. This has been improving significantly in the past 2 years as the platform has matured.
Renewal is mainly on the fact that Nintex is so widely used and it would be impossible to migrate all of these existing workflows to another engine. Third-party lock-in within SharePoint is pretty strong, which makes it difficult to move to something else. Our Nintex database is well-over 100 GBs. Nintex email support is very good, and I've been impressed. The Community however is non-existent and filled with unanswered questions.
Nintex Workflow does exactly what it is advertised to do: make workflow development fast and easy. It doesn't provide very much new functionality, but it isn't really supposed to. When I am working with a client on a SharePoint project, I am always happy if I hear that they use Nintex Workflow, as it makes workflows much easier.
The Nintex Process Platform has never crashed or had any availability issues during my usage. However there was an issue that was of my own making that caused a slowdown of the system. I had set up a process to run once a day and check for employees on a list that had certain parameters selected, and for some reason that I had to troubleshoot, the process instead ran constantly, which filled the cache quickly. I ended up having to dismantle that process so the system didn't crash.
Unlike any other process automation product out there. Not only is it a low-code, easy to use tool for building processes in environments like SharePoint or Salesforce, they have really started to expand their tool-set by offering tools to manage other things like process mapping, RPA, mobile,etc.
The support team works as fast as they can and they are usually fast to solver the issues. Sometimes they need more time to solve one of them because our workflows and so on are more complex than usual clients.
I used the Nintex training software, it was easy to watch and follow along. It didn't go too fast and was descriptive enough to understand what the steps needed were in order to produce efficient workflows and user friendly forms.
1.Start with Simple Workflows: Begin with basic workflows to gain user confidence before tackling complex processes. 2.Involve Stakeholders Early: Engage business users and IT early to align workflows with real business needs. 3.Comprehensive Training: Invest in user training to ensure smooth adoption and reduce resistance. 4.Leverage Prebuilt Templates: Use Nintex’s templates to speed up implementation and maintain consistency. 5.Iterate and Optimize: Continuously improve workflows based on user feedback and performance metrics.
Datamatics RPA TruBot is cost-wise and product-wise much easier to use. I have realized that it gives user experience, too. Support from Datamatics is also good. The regular webinars and trials and demo also help Datamatics to increase the knowledge base and perform better than other industry competitors.
I was not part of selecting Nintex, but I think Nintex does a better job of generating linear flowcharts vs. Microsoft Visio because it automates the majority of the process of creating process maps. (Microsoft Visio is better for creating flowcharts that are not linear. because it is less automated and more flexible.)
The scalability is really bottlenecked by the imagination of the user. I was able to make processes for my own personal usage, making my daily tasks easier. I was also able to make processes that affected hundreds of employees, making large standardization and efficiency gains. So either way, the system is used the same way, and I was the limiting factor.
People have woken up to the amount of overlap after mapping their processes.
People can be resistant to process changes. You need to have the support from above or support from the 'business' that you are process changing to be able to see the positive impacts.
Numbers talk. if you can get a general salary figure from your HR dept to show savings for 'employee bands', then when you present reports, they will be all the richer in data.