Deacom, an ECI Software Solution, is an ERP platform with a wide range of capabilities designed for growing batch and process manufacturers. It helps to reduce the burden caused by multi-system complexities and avoid the manual workarounds that plague traditional ERP implementations by having all of required functionality in a single platform.
N/A
M1
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
M1, from ECI Software Solutions headquartered in Ft. Worth, is an all-in-one manufacturing ERP software solution, built for small and medium-sized discrete manufacturers.
N/A
Pricing
Deacom ERP
M1
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Deacom ERP
M1
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Deacom ERP
M1
Features
Deacom ERP
M1
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
6.8
Ratings
11% below category average
M1
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
6.80 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
7.7
Ratings
6% below category average
M1
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Single sign-on capability
8.20 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.30 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
6.4
Ratings
12% below category average
M1
6.5
Ratings
10% below category average
Dashboards
5.50 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Standard reports
6.90 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Custom reports
6.80 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
M1
6.9
Ratings
11% below category average
Accounts payable
7.30 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.90 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.20 Ratings
5.20 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.10 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.90 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
7.4
Ratings
7% below category average
M1
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
Inventory tracking
7.30 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Location management
7.80 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
6.6
Ratings
18% below category average
M1
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
Pricing
6.60 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Order entry
7.20 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Credit card processing
6.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
6.70 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
6.9
Ratings
8% below category average
M1
6.5
Ratings
14% below category average
Billing Management
7.30 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.20 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
6.20 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.20 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Period Close
7.50 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
6.6
Ratings
5% below category average
M1
6.3
Ratings
10% below category average
Contract Repository
7.70 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
6.00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Supplier Management
6.20 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
6.4
Ratings
15% below category average
M1
6.6
Ratings
12% below category average
Production Process Design
6.20 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Production Management
6.20 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
6.20 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Work Execution
6.60 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
6.80 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
6.0
Ratings
17% below category average
M1
5.6
Ratings
24% below category average
Forecasting
5.80 Ratings
4.70 Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
6.20 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
7.8
Ratings
9% above category average
M1
4.4
Ratings
47% below category average
Product Master Data Management
7.80 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Proposal Management
00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
-
Ratings
M1
5.6
Ratings
25% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
-
Ratings
M1
5.2
Ratings
28% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
6.20 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
5.40 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
4.60 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
-
Ratings
M1
2.7
Ratings
94% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
2.70 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Deacom ERP
-
Ratings
M1
4.9
Ratings
28% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
5.90 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
4.80 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
3.80 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
3.80 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Good for the price and basic functionality but sometimes calculations inside the application are not handled smoothly. For us, we have no problems for our Lb customers but our Gallon/Kg customers usually have issues have unit conversion issues.
Implementation is by far the weakest link in the ECI/M1 process. Although the tool is powerful, the client is expected to drive the process of learning the tool, planning the meetings with consultants, identifying risks and making mitigation plans, etc. without any samples, guidance or assistance on the part of ECI. The tool is best suited to high volume, standard product manufacturers who build to inventory or to order without much variation. The shop floor routing and time tracking are straightforward if you can master the convoluted Unit Of Measure calculations. The tool is either hosted locally or accessed through Remote Desktop. Shop floor is web enabled but the main desktop for M1 is still a relay which makes connectivity a potential issue. Moving this platform to a truly web hosted environment would substantially improve connectivity and eliminate compatibility issues with Apple products
Manage inventory counts. Good precision on quantities in and out, through shipping, MI, MR, and receipts.
Job costing shows great details on labor, operations, and materials to be used. I wished that would do better in outside operations that would return, but we still think it is great.
Ability to track changes (changelog), showing all changes that had in a particular place. Such as where, when, and by whom a line item unit price was changed in a PO.
Link, traceability, keeping history. If done correctly, it is amazing to keep the history of a part/lot.
The amount of user rights/customization is unbelievable. It can be hard to set up in the beginning, but it is great that you can give some very specific access to a user, and it is not (in general) as a package.
Some of the functions are pretty detailed - and so they take a while to generate screens and pages in reports.
We actually use it for 2 companies we own - and it would be nice if the inter company communication was a little smoother. It's hard to share some data, and not everything is possible to be shared.
Customized reports need to backed up before any updates to M1 or they're lost. It seems M1 overwrites the report folders everytime you run an update - so you have to keep track of what you've changed in Crystal Reports and restore it.
Because it would be helpful if ECI would provide better documentation, communication and workflows to understand how each field interacts within the system and how each of those touch other areas within M1. It would also be useful if ECI would provide prescheduled training for how to customize things with M1 through Design Studio
Deacom ERP is much faster to respond to bulk sales order processing, large numbers of EDI transactions and query response time. Deacom ERP support is vastly better, and the team is very helpful.
Our customization requirements were not that high and based on a price/cost benefit M1 was the winner. SAP was considered but the upfront costs and challenging learning curve together with the lack of flexibility in the SAP HANA public cloud version made the M1 choice more natural. SAP Services is usually more expensive compared to M1.