Dialpad Ai Contact Center is an inbound or outbound call center platform and solution, that helps companies connect with customers across all channels and skip the repetitive questions, retaining reviewable conversations and context history.
$80
per month per user
Zoom Contact Center
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Zoom Contact Center helps businesses deliver prompt, accurate, and highly personalized customer experiences that drive loyalty. It includes intelligent self-service and routing, a unified communications and contact center, and video optimized high-touch engagements.
$69
per month per user
Pricing
Dialpad Support
Zoom Contact Center
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$80
per month per user
Advanced
$115
per month per user
Premium
$150
per month per user
Essentials
$69
per month per user
Premium
$99
per month per user
Elite
$149
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dialpad Support
Zoom Contact Center
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Dialpad Support
Zoom Contact Center
Considered Both Products
Dialpad Support
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Dialpad Support
I have not used another software like Dialpad before
Dialpad is so much better than Sisco. Oh my, when I had to use that there were always major outages. At the time i worked for a phone company that was based off of commission so once Sisco when out, so did my money. It was so aggravating. I have never had a issue with Dialpad …
That was 3 years ago and They didn't have Ai at that time. But only reason why we did not choose Genesys was, it required Gateway systems set in our office which did not meet our BCP requirement
Dialpad Support is superior to both Avaya and Genesys, because only Dialpad offers a automatic transcribing system during and after the call. It also is very easy to use and can send text messages during a call. The only thing that needs improvement on Dialpad is the interval …
We looked at ARIA, but we already had Dialpad Support and decided just to move forward with more features. I think the familiarity with the Dialpad app and the basic features made the addition of new features a much more seamless process rather than attempting to try dual …
price mainly and they had voicemail transcription and a reliable mobile app. More functionality and reliability and Dialpad Support had all the features we needed and onboarding was super easy. Overall, the experience with Dialpad is quite positive. We came from another in …
I think Dialpad Support works better than the other phone systems we have used in the past. The only thing I prefer with Phone Burner versus Dialpad is the ability to pre-load lists in which you can dial out on or send mass texts out at once (like how can you email out in Phone …
Dialpad support stacks up against Ringcentral in their AI features. Dialpad offers real time voice transcripts that aid in better understanding that patients needs if we are not able to fully hear them due to inhouse noise/connection. This built in voice intelligence helps us …
Dialpad Support is far and away the better of the 3: - Ease of use for the admin and the end-user is top-notch (the others were incredibly difficult to navigate and use) - call quality has never been better - analytics is my favorite - so much more comprehensive than what …
Dialpad and Ringcentral (along with most Cloud VOIP services) are all very similar now and the only difference is their unique approach to the interface. In most cases we would go with a brand that is well know or a common name among other institutions. Dialpad brings a sense …
I have only used one other product aside from Dialpad Contact Center; it was called "Office@Hand Phone-Ringcentral". It does not compare to Dialpad; it only has the main functionalities of an office phone.
Cost, breadth of services, customer support, flexibility in reporting and analytics, less downtime and more productivity. It has just about everything we need in a contact management software. The call center live dashboard is customizable, the call history is in real time …
Dialpad is the evolution of MiCloud, it does everything MiCloud did and then some and it does it better. The level of flexibility and customization provided by Dialpad allowed us to go to the next level in terms of productivity and interconnection, their interface is …
Vonage does have much more deeper integration with Salesforce (a ton) but, it is very hard to manager and use and needs dedicated resources to pull it off. It also doesn't have as many easily used features for agents.
Twilio is along the same lines of Vonage, but, offers a lot …
Dialpad contact center share a bunch of feature in just one application, using it in your smartphone, web browser, tablet, or even your smart TV, and yes, technically possible for you to open a web browser on any smart TV and start showing the real-time dashboard to your whole …
At my company we have worked with other Contact Center solutions, both for internal use and for distribution, and we have chosen Zoom Contact Center as the best of all for its ease of use, implementation time, and easy adoption.
Microsoft Teams was very difficult. Many third-party providers didn't understand the integration and capabilities of the systems. The Teams app is very clunky, and you can get very different capabilities and compatibility when using it between Mac and PC environments. Zoom had …
Without being too negative, I would say that Zoom shines in every area that Mitel left us lacking. The application itself is far and beyond more optimized for our systems. As the Contact Center Administrator, uptime and stability and call quality are my main priorities, and …
As the person in IT dealing with the day-to-day issues that come up, Zoom Contact Center is far superior to 8x8 Contact center. When we had 8x8 we probably saw 10+ tickets (we were a company of about 115 employees) every day. Most of those times we would have to uninstall and …
Zoom has all the features Jive lack at the moment, example: Routing skills, better analytics and logs, being able to add conditions to the routing flows.
Ease of administration, use, and UI. Very dynamic platform designed by people who wanted to make something that made sense, unlike every other phone system out there that is a nightmare.
It is a good product that fits our needs, we considered using the Contact Center despite the fact of still lacking important capabilities (we think it is till s in its "toddler" age) because we see how rapidly Zoom builds their products and add functionality to it, and because …
Talkdesk was an all-around lower-quality product. The app wasn't great, the customer service was lackluster, and the call quality was very often poor. Its reporting and live team dashboard were better than ZCC's
There are options and ways to get to specific feature sets that are similar to what Zoom can offer.
Many of the Zoom included features are add-ons for the RingCentral offering. So cost goes up and can also be an add-on difficulties/deployment costs as well. When we reviewed the …
When we did a head to head comparison between the two products we felt that Zoom stacked better in price, performance and ease of use. We did trial both products and determined that the users liked the Zoom interface better.
Setup and management is much easier compared to other applications. Making changes is all done from one place and not multiple. Changes can also be made and implemented very quickly.
In my opinion, Zoom Phone is far more user friendly and cost effective. I think Zoom Phone has superior user and administrator support. When you have issues, you have a person to talk to quickly. The administrative side of Zoom Phone is by far one of the best that I've every …
I think the Dialpad Support provides a great way to speed up calls being directed to the right department but also provides the added safety of detailed information so that calls are not lost in the shuffle. The ability to better educate new folks on how to route calls and take some of the note-taking about who is calling and why off their plate is great.
Perfect for companies that have agents all over the place, e.g., different offices or WFH. Also good for companies that aren't big enough to have a "phone guy" as this platform allows IT to do the phone work as it doesn't require esoteric knowledge like other phone systems.
Customer service - Whether for sales, setup, or technical assistant, their team is always patient, informed, and helpful.
Cutting Edge - Every month there are a plethora of new or enhanced features that are well thought, tested, and ready for implementing.
Stability - Our uptime is important to our clients. As a 24/7 365 day/year contact center, having confidence that Zoom's systems are up and running means our clients have trust in our abilities to service their calls.
I cannot think of one single reason we would stop using Dialpad. There has been too much positive feedback from our staff as well as the ease of use and training for new hires is big incentive to renew. We've looked at other VoIP products and price versus feature set is overwhelmingly in favor of continuing to use Dialpad.
It's a great tool for our department! We're still trying to figure out how to best utilize all of the capabilities and have not yet explored all it can do. So far, we love it, but know there's more it can do!
First and foremost for our results, the omnichannel approach and ease of use on the internal side (agents, supervisors and administrators) have made adoption very simple, we have managed to reduce response times (SLA) and internal communication has become very fluid. We get good feedback from our clients for having implemented ZCC in the company to serve them.
Dialpad is so much better than Sisco. Oh my, when I had to use that there were always major outages. At the time i worked for a phone company that was based off of commission so once Sisco when out, so did my money. It was so aggravating. I have never had a issue with Dialpad where my phone has gone completely out
Microsoft Teams was very difficult. Many third-party providers didn't understand the integration and capabilities of the systems. The Teams app is very clunky, and you can get very different capabilities and compatibility when using it between Mac and PC environments. Zoom had a local team that could help with the transition directly, which is very valuable
The callback feature has saved clients a lot of hold time
The voicemail system has allowed cases to be handled properly by client's being able to leave a message for the proper agent
The Ai transcript feature has helped dozens of agents, as well as the company, avoid a lot of hassle, time, and lost money due to verifying conversations and information that normally would be much harder to confirm without it