e-Builder vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
e-Builder
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
e-Builder is a cloud-based construction program management solution that manages capital program cost, schedule, and documents. It allows owners to measure and manage the capital project delivery process from planning, design, procurement, construction and operations.N/A
Oracle Primavera
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Oracle’s Primavera is a software suite designed for construction and other asset-intensive industries. It contains a variety of project planning, management, and execution components for buyers to select from.N/A
Pricing
e-BuilderOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
e-BuilderOracle Primavera
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
e-BuilderOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Considered Both Products
e-Builder
Chose e-Builder
From what I have seen, e-Builder has the edge; a significant edge over AiM, slightly less so over PMWeb.
Chose e-Builder
We have not compared other plans since the boss prefers this program from personal experience. But from using this program for 2 years I can see why we don't need to compare. Why fix something that isn't broken? It gets the job done, yes we might run into some issues but I feel …
Chose e-Builder
The client selected e-Builder, so we did not have a choice as the consultant.
Chose e-Builder
We like e-Builder over competitors because it is easier to manage and navigate workflows with.
Chose e-Builder
Procore is much more user friendly and better for project management however there are features in e-Builder that I do not have access to that probably make it more attractive for owners as they deal with financial management of projects.
Chose e-Builder
EB is user friendly and stacks up very high, compared to the others.
Chose e-Builder
We didn't select e-Builder, it was selected by our customer. It was their preferred method to keep items secure and be able to communicate with various contractors across great distances. It seems to work for all of us as a good gateway for sharing information in a safe, …
Chose e-Builder
The previous program our client used was not user-friendly; documents wouldn't load properly and it was hard to find the project file or document you were looking for. It was harder to collaborate with other companies or entities than it is with e-Builder so switching has been …
Oracle Primavera
Chose Oracle Primavera
Oracle Primavera is more easy and integrated with other systems
Chose Oracle Primavera
Oracle is better laid out and has more functionality as well as end-user flow. The login process, billing, and construction management features are easy to find, easy to use, and helpful. The limitations on Quickbooks restrict users from the ability to view and bill full …
Chose Oracle Primavera
We use Oracle ERP and are happy with it. We have long-standing relationship with Oracle and our workforce is well versed with it. We wanted a high-end scalable software for construction projects and Primavera fits the bill. Payment systems like Textura can be easily integrated …
Chose Oracle Primavera
Oracle Primavera is better and faster than the other solutions available. Especially with large data sets.
Chose Oracle Primavera
I have also used Microsoft Project in the past to do scheduling. While easier to use than Primavera, it does not have the same capabilities to determine CPM. Furthermore, it would not be appropriate for larger sized projects.
Chose Oracle Primavera
I did not select Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. It was an inherent application. Having used other applications, compared to those, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a far superior tool for portfolio management. However, in the span of the last 10 years, there …
Chose Oracle Primavera
When compared to the likes of the field, Oracle is the least friendly in regards to being accessible to the team with Smartsheet working the most favorably in that aspect. Otherwise, Oracle's PM program is more intuitive than Microsoft Project, has more features when compared …
Chose Oracle Primavera
I found Oracle Primavera better compared to Clarity as it offers better navigation. The reporting feature is also better in Primavera. The views provided by Primavera are far better compared to Clarity.
Chose Oracle Primavera
Primavera allows several users to work in a single file at the same time. This allows the team to develop and update the project schedule for reporting much faster. Also, the user can see updates that effect logically link activities in the future easily. MS Project does not.
Chose Oracle Primavera
P6 is the most robust scheduling software I've used. It's the best solution for large-scale projects.
Features
e-BuilderOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
e-Builder
7.4
Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
e-BuilderOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
monday.com
monday.com
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
e-BuilderOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
e-BuilderOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend
e-Builder is well suited to situations where there are stakeholders across a large organization who need updates on a regular basis and great for tracking costs and schedule. It is less well suited to small projects with little complexity. It is also not well suited to projects with multiple primes
Read full review
This program is well suited for online database management for construction-related fields and their contract management. It has many features which allow for reporting, issuance of changes, applications for payment and HB, and related construction-related documentation for both client and user. It also allows one to print and review in PDF any required documentation needed as per contracts.
Read full review
Pros
  • I appreciate the fully configurable dashboards. They are beneficial for both individual or company-wide use.
  • Getting email alerts when documents are recently uploaded is helpful with staying on top of current submittal processes. Highly supportive in the process of getting items paid for in a timely fashion.
  • Redundancy is easily reduced because e-Builder is helpful in standardizing different processes. Transparency is also emphasized, which keeps people on the same page.
Read full review
  • Critical Path Methodology will identify potential issues in on time completion if activities move.
  • A resources loaded schedule can accurately forecast % complete and staffing requirements.
  • Coding allows easy group, sort, and filtering when reporting to certain business units out of the same file.
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be great if EB can introduce an asset management module where we can tie assets to a project. This is the biggest issue I am currently having. If you can develop this, it would make Finance, Engineering, and Operations life easier. In addition, synchronize data out in field to EB for creating specific reports. For example, in water utility environment, knowing how much total linear feet of water line pipes were installed per day, per month, or per year. Furthermore, know what size pipe was installed.
  • Help improve the Planning Module and make it more user friendly, similar to the updates made to Schedule Module
  • Provide better reporting options on Dashboard Module. For example, allowing us to choose different types of charts, colors, etc.
  • Improve the speed connection downtime which always happens around 1230am-2pm EST. EB really drags in speed when already logged in or having to log in to access the system.
Read full review
  • The software is high end with rich features, hence its rich price.
  • There is room for improvement in their customer service.
  • Oracle is doing its best in coming up with new features, and has a planned roadmap. It would be good if the enhancements are delivered faster.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Because again, one of our biggest clients entrusts E-builder to work with their systems. And its functions work for us as well.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Simple, because have a used it for the past two years, so i'm very familiar with the particular aspects of its program that I need to accomplish my tasks.
Read full review
Is easy to use but the the interface should be more nice and contemporary
Read full review
Support Rating
Again, because our technical support is great. He doesn't always answer the phone but he definitely responds to emails fairly quickly. In addition, I like that he actually resolves an issue and I have yet to encounter the same issue twice. Actually, I haven't encountered many issues at all in the two years I have used the software.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
1. Set up the time to get training on the sytem before you go all in.
2. Listen, ask questions and actually practice using the tools and features while in class. It helps tremendously with becoming comfortable and remembering how things work.
3. Don't be afraid to mess up. They are helpful and will help resolve your issue in a timely manner
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Procore is much more user friendly and better for project management however there are features in e-Builder that I do not have access to that probably make it more attractive for owners as they deal with financial management of projects.
Read full review
I did not select Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. It was an inherent application. Having used other applications, compared to those, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a far superior tool for portfolio management. However, in the span of the last 10 years, there are newer, perhaps better products available. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management does still manage to get the job done, but its time in the sun is fading.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Has added extra steps to processes that were previously easier. And I work for a university that complicates everything
  • Has more than cut in half the time it takes to generate reports about project status
  • Has made project management more efficient
Read full review
  • P6 has had measurable ROI in the fact that projects can be completed on schedule or sooner using it.
  • P6 it presents data date stamps, which are used to share with clients during the project for the progress of the schedule.
  • P6 may have a high level of entry to use for the smaller project, which can be a hindrance to use.
Read full review
ScreenShots