Ridder iQ vs. Microsoft Dynamics 365

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ridder iQ
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 is a CRM providing sales, marketing, and service functionality. It is offered as SaaS and on-premise. Dynamics 365 is part of the larger Dynamics suite of business intelligence and ERP products.N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQMicrosoft Dynamics 365
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQMicrosoft Dynamics 365
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQMicrosoft Dynamics 365
Features
Ridder iQMicrosoft Dynamics 365
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
7.8
Ratings
4% above category average
API for custom integration6.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Plug-ins5.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom fields00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Custom objects00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Scripting environment00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
6.5
Ratings
24% below category average
Single sign-on capability7.70 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.20 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Pricing7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Billing Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
23% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
28% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared4.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository4.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
4.9
Ratings
28% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Risk Repository4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments4.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Transportation Execution Management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Production Process Design8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Forecasting6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
17% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365
-
Ratings
Proposal Management5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
6.9
Ratings
11% below category average
Customer data management / contact management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Workflow management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Territory management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Opportunity management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Quote & order management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Interaction tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
6.7
Ratings
12% below category average
Case management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Call center management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Help desk management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Lead management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Email marketing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
8.3
Ratings
9% above category average
Task management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Customizable reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
7.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Social data00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Social engagement00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
6.5
Ratings
12% below category average
Marketing automation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Compensation management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365
7.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Mobile access00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Ridder iQMicrosoft Dynamics 365
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
5.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.4
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
5.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ridder iQMicrosoft Dynamics 365
Likelihood to Recommend
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Read full review
Based on user experience, I would like to recommend this software to my friends or colleagues on the AP Handling. I like AP recording the most because it makes my work easy. I have been using this for the past 2 years, and it's one of the best for this task. Easy to use and user-friendly.
Read full review
Pros
  • Flexibility in setting budgets for specific parts of a project
  • Insight in costs (journaldetails)(bookkeeping, however not Ridder financials)
  • Sending out offers and order confirmation
  • sending out purchase orders
  • Flexibiliteit bij het vaststellen van budgetten voor specifieke onderdelen van een project
  • Inzicht in kosten (journaalgegevens) (boekhouding, echter geen Ridder financials)
  • Het versturen van offertes en orderbevestigingen
  • het versturen van inkooporders
Read full review
  • Some useful out-of-the-box features, like mass uploads of Leads from trade shows or when qualifying a Lead, CRM automatically creates the Opportunity, Contact, and Account for you, etc.
  • Really powerful customizations through the user interface to improve user experience. Things like Business Rules, for example, if Field A = 1, then Field B = 2 and Field C = 2, if Field A = 2, then Field B and Field C don't apply, so automatically hide them.
  • Or other functionality that improves user experience, like Business Process Flows. These walk users step by step through our business process, helping them know when certain actions should take place, and at what point other data is now required. We've used this extensively with our Lead to Opportunity to Quote to Order process, helping users understand the business process each step of the way.
  • Customizations built on top of the platform now called model-driven PowerApps. You can have connections to "typical" data, like Accounts, Contacts, or Opportunities, for example, but then connect that data to custom entities, records that only apply to your specific business. This is all done through the user interface and allows you to customize and automate specific line-of-business applications for your specific needs.
  • Behind the scenes, D365 CE is built on SQL. So the data conforms to industry standards and makes it much easier to interact with. Your developers and IT team will thank you.
Read full review
Cons
  • The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
  • Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
  • De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
  • Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een ​​kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
Read full review
  • Microsoft Dynamics 365 storage & license cost can prohibit some large deployments or even cost-sensitive small projects from using the platform (although I'm certain most deployments would realize a positive ROI if implemented correctly with process automation).
  • The cost and licensing document for Dynamics 365 is 61 pages and will take a rocket scientist to understand it. It's better to just have your Microsoft help estimate the cost if they are willing to help you that.
  • The documentation on how to first fully understand the Out of the Box default solution and settings is lacking or even non-existing. This has the potential to derail Dynamic 365 launches and implementations from the gitgo. Want to use an out of the box entity?.. well it's probably related to 5 other entities that require configuration and full understanding of it to successful implement. And you ask where is the laymen guide or instructions?... User groups and forums. In Summary, Microsoft can up its game in deployment training and supporting documentation.
  • Microsoft needs to incentivize more external platforms to build app connectors for easy integration, such as ZenDesk, Slack, Tableau, etc. Even the current connector apps such as Salesforce, MailChimp, Docusign are useless or don't work at all.
  • Several limitations inhibit successful Dynamics 365 deployments such as: limited number of Rollup field calculations (summarizing fields on child/related records), limited number rows that can exported to Excel via advanced find, Dynamics 365 files, log and database storage size limit is extremely small and will always require purchasing additional storage (for Online deployments).
  • New user buy-in or acceptance or system platform changes can be difficult if a solid change management plan isn't enacted.
  • Don't expect much help from Microsoft on implementation or solutions unless it's a technical flaw with the platform. Microsoft relies on their MVP partner network to consult for implementations at a hefty cost. Hiring a knowledgeable and savvy Dynamics 365 System Administrator can reduce the need for consultant support; of course, this is dependant upon many many variables.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
Read full review
CRM has allowed us to keep all of our data in one place that is easy for all users within the company to view. I came into the company after they had been using CRM for about 4 years. They have all said that since we have used this it has helped us control work processes better, it has allowed us to be able to track things so much better, and has been something that has helped unite many processes that used to be all over the place. We are currently using CRM 4.0 and are planning on upgrading in the next 18 months to the 2011 version. Support for 4.0 is almost all but dried up. Understandably so. Some of the customization we have done, and a plugins we use, are now contained within the 2011 version so we are looking forward to that upgrade. We use an email marketing company as well, and they primarily support the 2011 version, but their product connects and is integrated within CRM. This is a great benefit as well so that all of our marketing information can be contained in one location.
Read full review
Usability
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
Read full review
The platform offers a comprehensive suite of features that cater to various business needs, but its complexity can be a barrier for new users. While the interface is visually appealing, navigation can be cumbersome, and some users may find it challenging to access certain functionalities without adequate training.
Read full review
Support Rating
Expert level of the support engineers is adequate. However in our opinion it does take a fair amount of time to respond
Read full review
Our partner, Ledgeview Partners has been FANTASTIC to work with. They are always timely in their response and have taken time to understand our business and our specific needs. We've made a lot of advanced customizations and they have been a great help in making those updates.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I didn't work here yet at the time of the implementation
Read full review
We used a data warehouse to house our data, and our IT team and implementation vendor worked diligently ahead of time to construct idea implementation plans. Out of millions of records- we had less than a dozen errors, which is remarkable. My major insight is simply having a group of completely devoted individuals working towards your goal who fully understand the desired outcome. Focused resources for implementation season are critical to success.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Read full review
Microsoft Dynamics 365 is much more robust, with more customizable features, such as user-specific settings and customer customization options. The system is easy to us,e and all modules can be customized to the exact need of the user. The standard version includes everything you need for a small business that is starting out. Additional features can be added as needed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Implement the business rules and forces them to be applied
  • SDK is used 90% for managing all order inputs and product BOM
  • The software tends to come to an halt for changes for on premise which is required of you have software/machines communicating to/from the ERP
  • Implementeer de bedrijfsregels en zorg ervoor dat ze worden toegepast
  • SDK wordt voor 90% gebruikt voor het beheren van alle orderinputs en product-BOM
  • De software loopt vaak vast bij wijzigingen voor on-premises, wat vereist dat u software/machines hebt die met het ERP communiceren
Read full review
  • If you know your stuff, this product does just fine. They are always adapting (aren't they all, always?), so expect it to grow and for you to grow with it.
  • Don't expect new employees, or places with high turnover, to ease into this product quickly, or even on a moderate time table.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Ridder iQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Ridder IQ combines the knowledge and practical experience gained since 1982 and is built on the latest software techniques such as .NET, C# and Microsoft SQL.Screenshot of Ridder IQ includes a complete CRM system with integration to Exchange and Outlook, purchase, sales, stock and time administration, as well as document management systems, integrated report designer and an authorization system.