Electric AI vs. Maze

Electric AI

Electric AI

1 Reviews and Ratings

Maze

Maze

32 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Electric AI	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	Electric AI, headquartered in New York, delivers IT support for remote, onsite, or hybrid teams. The eponymous Electric platform service desk staff augmentation solution provides real-time issue resolution, security at the device, app and network levels, employee onboarding/offboarding, and other IT management solutions.	N/A
Maze	Score 8.7 out of 10	N/A	Maze is a rapid user testing platform from Maze.design in Paris, designed to give users actionable user insights, in a matter of hours. The vendor states that with it, users can test remotely, autonomously, and collaboratively.	$75 per month 3+ seats

Pricing

Electric AI

Maze

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Professional: $75
per month 3+ seats
Organization: custom pricing

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Electric AI	Maze
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Electric AI	Maze
Considered Both Products	Electric AI No answer on this topic	Maze MC Matthew Carter UX research Chose Maze We left sprig to use maze because sprig had unreliable Figma questions and integrations. We chose maze as it was partnered with Dovetail and Askable, that's how we heard about them. We're not particularly loyal or wedded to maze. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Maze We ran a proof of concept exercise between Maze User Testing and Optimal Workshop. We found both products to be as good as each other in the elements of the products that both offered. Optimal Workshop did offer a lot more than what was required for the specific project for … Incentivized Helpful? D Hendrik Mulyana Product Design lead Chose Maze A lookback is an alternative option if you think Maze User Testing is quite expensive for you, but look back has a different approach to Maze User Testing. Lookback focuses on qualitative usability testing instead of quantitative UserTesting. And also, Maze User Testing has a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Maze Maze User Testing is brilliant to test with a large volume of people and if you’re not after particular qualitative insights, like UserTesting would offer. The card sorting feature is basic and not as mature as Optimal Workshop would offer but it does the job and can be used in … Incentivized Helpful? Milos Danilovic Lead Product Designer Chose Maze When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze … Incentivized Helpful? AK Akos Krommer Senior Implementation Consultant Chose Maze Figma helps to design and prototype out the concept but it does not allow to facilitate feedback gathering on a specific UI or even UX decision. That's where Maze comes into the picture with it's vaious features that helps to get the right insight to build a better product in a … Incentivized Helpful? Bryce Thompson Lead Experience Designer Chose Maze UserTesting Expensive Not as modern a UX as Maze for contributors, stakeholders, and testers Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Maze I find Maze's UI more user friendly Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Electric AI	Maze
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	Smartlook Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	No answers on this topic	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	No answers on this topic	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Electric AI	Maze
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	6.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Electric AI	Maze
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Suited for: - I think that this software is a must-have for any experience or product designer that needs validation from any audience - Designers that rapidly prototype with Figma - Designers looking to establish an inexpensive way to deliver on user testing Less appropriate for: - If you are looking for a survey replacement this is probably not for you even though it does that quite well, simply due to the cost. Google Forms would be a more fiscal choice. - Marketing visual designers who are adept at visual builder tools (WebFlow, Divi, Elementor, etc) with A/B testing ability would probably find other products more valuable. Bryce Thompson Lead Experience Designer Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	It helps to gather quick and helpful insight It helps greatly to validate design and prototypes Intuitive tool and easy to work with Incentivized AK Akos K Senior Implementation Consultant Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Too easy to delete a draft Maze User Testing - I lost all my progress yesterday and had to redo it Some testers have mentioned the Maze User Testing interface was hard to use - didn't get specifics on that Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Any issues that presented themselves were dealt with in a quick and efficient manner and fully rectified by the knowledgeable team over at Maze. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze could really tick all the above boxes. Incentivized Milos Danilovic Lead Product Designer Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	You are able to validate your project or design with a maze User Testing. Maze User Testing is an all-in-one usability tool platform. You are able to create a multi-scenario for a free option with limited features. Pricing is quite expensive. if they have an option for less than $99/month. A freelancer or small company can consider using it. Incentivized D Hendrik Mulyana Product Design lead Read full review
ScreenShots		Maze Screenshots