Nexonia, by Emburse, is a tool designed to streamline employee expense reporting. It is designed to increase visibility into spendings and make the expense tracking, approval, and reporting process paperless.
Nexonia was part of a merger with Certify in 2017 and is now part of the larger company formed from it and Chrome River, Emburse.
N/A
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
TIS helps CFOs, Treasurers, and Finance teams transform their global cash flow, liquidity, and payment functions. Since 2010, the cloud platform and service model have supported the office of the CFO to collaborate and attain efficiency, automation, and control. By streamlining connectivity between TIS' customers’ back-office systems and their worldwide banks, vendors, and business partners, TIS aims to enable…
N/A
Pricing
Emburse Nexonia
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Emburse Nexonia
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
TIS helps clients eliminate redundant or unnecessary features and systems, and helps reduce banking and transaction fees for account rationalization projects. TIS manages all onboarding, maintenance, and service requests to eliminate clients' other consulting, IT, and other technology-related costs. In addition, TIS provides rebates and rewards programs in certain areas of our solution to help clients optimize payments activity conducted through various localities and supplier networks.
As mentioned earlier in the several questions, Emburse Nexonia is easy to use compared to all the above applications. Integration is easy and plenty of automation opportunities in Emburse Nexonia. Capturing a time sheet is an additional option that no other application has this …
It captures receipts through the mobile app and is more convenient Easy to code time sheets and User-friendly and It will sync with Intacct and BILL for payments it greatly Improves suppliers and partner relationships it si very much Cost management it has good Product …
I used in the past Nexonia Expenses in my previous company and in my current company, we use SAP Concur. I think that Nexonia is clearly a good alternative and very affordable. Again, it seems like it has problems of scalability so when your company get to a certain size, it …
Nexonia is probably more expensive than Expensify but has been around longer and has more features (accounts payable, time entry, etc). We decided on Nexonia for their customization features and amazing customer support.
TIS was the only service provider who offered construction of payment formats based on SAP IDOC. All other service providers were offering only a central payment portal for approval workflow and banking connection leaving construction of payment formats with us.
We evaluated a number of vendors including Kyriba, Fides and FIS-Trax. Ultimately Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) was the solution of choice given a combination of better fit-for-purpose and pricing, although there are other technologies out there that could have …
Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) is fully cloud based (versus Sungard, Wall Street Systems) and covers most cruicial functionality: cash collection from multiple subsidiaries and distribution. It does not fit well with cash balances risk management but the system (Treasury …
The implementation team is strong and supportive of your needs which was important. The solution fit the needs of company very well with many ERP systems and bank accounts. The company was continuing to improve its product based on customer feedback. Strong IT background at …
We have used bank applications and another large TMS provider based in the US. Our prior TMS was a full-scale system which was very robust and extremely complex. We were not using 3/4 of the functionality and we decided it made more sense to select a simpler system that met our …
The Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) implementation time (and cost) was one big criteria. Simply speaking it would have taken too long and too expensive to work here with SAP. TIS reduced to the minimum meaning only the really necessary points were taken to establish a …
[The] bank transaction manager was the unique selling proposition of Treasury Intelligence Solutions. No other comparable solution was available at that point in time. All other solutions would have caused high capacities and longer roll-out periods.
Well suited for businesses where the billing goes based on time and expenses. Easy tracking and integration helps to solve the accounting entry flow in the accounting system. Less appropriate where there is only fixed fee billing and time tracking metrics are not much required.
With this robust treasury tool it is very easy to increase the speed of financial operations with, for example, outgoing payments and cash flow analysis management. Liquidity is not a problem thanks to Treasury Intelligence Solutions, we are confident in this tool to fulfill the most important operations of outgoing payments. I can also recommend it because it is very simple to use and it also has a very simple application.
The design interface isn't intuitive or attractive. Because I use it irregularly (less than once a month), I spend a lot of wasted time trying to remember how to use it.
If you have complicated submissions, it's challenging to figure out how to submit it correctly. I have to break each submission down into individual charges, although there's supposed to be a way to use a "split" feature or other features that would allow you to add multiple receipts to 1 day. After a year, I still haven't figured out how to use anything beyond one receipt = 1 submission.
User-friendliness in some areas could be improved. A function that explains buttons would be nice, similar to how it is in SAP with F1. But indeed you can find this on the support portal.
It is missing the Business Discovery Manager. This will solve many questions, so I cannot complain if we are missing a critical dashboard part of TIS. The logic of Master data and download of the same is done nicely. I would like to build my own report with this, but we would be back to BDM functions.
The BTM transaction monitor is its greatest strength, but also is a large jungle of entries. You can get lost in there. The deletion function should be upgraded if possible, [because] it's not the easiest to do a mass deletion.
Filtering of accounts that need to be assigned to the BANK link. It's only a small thing but can be super annoying every time it selects the first bank entry by default.
The main feature of usability is the outcome you get upon actions done. TIS is not complecated solution - it is rational and has most needed capabilites for cash management via multiple accounts in different jurisdictions. It works well for this task and evolutioning to the field of risk management to get all treasury job done well.
I was not talking directly with the customer support. My understanding was that, there was some maintenance on the platform but it was never inconvenient for employee or during pick time when employee would put their expenses in the tool. To that extent, I think the support for Nexonia is correct
It captures receipts through the mobile app and is more convenient Easy to code time sheets and User-friendly and It will sync with Intacct and BILL for payments it greatly Improves suppliers and partner relationships it si very much Cost management it has good Product functionality and performance it helped in Overall cost reductions for small firms
The implementation team is strong and supportive of your needs which was important. The solution fit the needs of company very well with many ERP systems and bank accounts. The company was continuing to improve its product based on customer feedback. Strong IT background at the top
In terms of risk mitigation of course we can reduce the number of people having access to banking if not needed. With dedicated teams and less people with access to individual Bank portals. Before access to bank portals were necessary for all sorts of manual payments and exceptions if we really implement the 100% of functions and dont leave exceptions that risk mitigation can be achieved and efficiency at automated payment runs.
At a large corporation with more than 60 entities and 400+ bank accounts, the savings and improvements are massive considering how time-consuming the manual work would be. I don't have any numbers to quote, unfortunately.
We are now massively expanding our TIS with the full integration of automated payment runs. This has larger operational impacts, like the possible consolidation of banking and dedicated payment teams.