Emburse Nexonia vs. TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Emburse Nexonia
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Nexonia, by Emburse, is a tool designed to streamline employee expense reporting. It is designed to increase visibility into spendings and make the expense tracking, approval, and reporting process paperless. Nexonia was part of a merger with Certify in 2017 and is now part of the larger company formed from it and Chrome River, Emburse.N/A
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
TIS helps CFOs, Treasurers, and Finance teams transform their global cash flow, liquidity, and payment functions. Since 2010, the cloud platform and service model have supported the office of the CFO to collaborate and attain efficiency, automation, and control. By streamlining connectivity between TIS' customers’ back-office systems and their worldwide banks, vendors, and business partners, TIS aims to enable…N/A
Pricing
Emburse NexoniaTIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Emburse NexoniaTIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTIS helps clients eliminate redundant or unnecessary features and systems, and helps reduce banking and transaction fees for account rationalization projects. TIS manages all onboarding, maintenance, and service requests to eliminate clients' other consulting, IT, and other technology-related costs. In addition, TIS provides rebates and rewards programs in certain areas of our solution to help clients optimize payments activity conducted through various localities and supplier networks.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Emburse NexoniaTIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Considered Both Products
Emburse Nexonia
Chose Emburse Nexonia
As mentioned earlier in the several questions, Emburse Nexonia is easy to use compared to all the above applications. Integration is easy and plenty of automation opportunities in Emburse Nexonia. Capturing a time sheet is an additional option that no other application has this …
Chose Emburse Nexonia
I just used it for a client so not much experience into that to compare with nexonia which I have used extensively.

So my tendency is more towards nexonia which is satisfying the needs and hence not going to search for any other options.
Chose Emburse Nexonia
It captures receipts through the mobile app and is more convenient Easy to code time sheets and User-friendly and It will sync with Intacct and BILL for payments it greatly Improves suppliers and partner relationships it si very much Cost management it has good Product …
Chose Emburse Nexonia
The price point was right for us with enough critical features to meet our main business goals.
Chose Emburse Nexonia
Concur was significantly higher in price than Nexonia Expenses which is why we chose Nexonia Expenses instead.
Chose Emburse Nexonia
I used in the past Nexonia Expenses in my previous company and in my current company, we use SAP Concur. I think that Nexonia is clearly a good alternative and very affordable. Again, it seems like it has problems of scalability so when your company get to a certain size, it …
Chose Emburse Nexonia
Nexonia's price point is hard to beat, and their integration with NetSuite is the best I have seen out there.
Chose Emburse Nexonia
Nexonia was inexpensive and had all the features that we needed when we implemented it.
Chose Emburse Nexonia
Nexonia is probably more expensive than Expensify but has been around longer and has more features (accounts payable, time entry, etc). We decided on Nexonia for their customization features and amazing customer support.
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
TIS was the only service provider who offered construction of payment formats based on SAP IDOC. All other service providers were offering only a central payment portal for approval workflow and banking connection leaving construction of payment formats with us.
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
We evaluated a number of vendors including Kyriba, Fides and FIS-Trax. Ultimately Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) was the solution of choice given a combination of better fit-for-purpose and pricing, although there are other technologies out there that could have …
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Reval, Serrala and Nomentia
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) is fully cloud based (versus Sungard, Wall Street Systems) and covers most cruicial functionality: cash collection from multiple subsidiaries and distribution. It does not fit well with cash balances risk management but the system (Treasury …
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
The implementation team is strong and supportive of your needs which was important. The solution fit the needs of company very well with many ERP systems and bank accounts. The company was continuing to improve its product based on customer feedback. Strong IT background at …
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Have used SAP BCM & Swift connectivity - Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) is a lot easier to use from a user admin perspective.
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
We have used bank applications and another large TMS provider based in the US. Our prior TMS was a full-scale system which was very robust and extremely complex. We were not using 3/4 of the functionality and we decided it made more sense to select a simpler system that met our …
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
The Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) implementation time (and cost) was one big criteria. Simply speaking it would have taken too long and too expensive to work here with SAP. TIS reduced to the minimum meaning only the really necessary points were taken to establish a …
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Treasury Intelligence Solutions was the first who offered this way of banking communication.
Chose TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
[The] bank transaction manager was the unique selling proposition of Treasury Intelligence Solutions. No other comparable solution was available at that point in time. All other solutions would have caused high capacities and longer roll-out periods.
Features
Emburse NexoniaTIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Expense Management
Comparison of Expense Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Nexonia
9.3
Ratings
8% above category average
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
-
Ratings
Employee Expense Reporting9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Corporate Card Reconciliation9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Nexonia
9.0
Ratings
9% above category average
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
-
Ratings
Customizable Approval Policies9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Document Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced OCR9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Treasury Management
Comparison of Treasury Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Nexonia
-
Ratings
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
7.1
Ratings
6% below category average
Cash and Liquidity Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Financial Fraud Prevention00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Treasury Management Payments00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Bank Account Management00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Treasury Risk Management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Treasury Reporting00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Liquidity Forecasting00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Market Data00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Emburse NexoniaTIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Small Businesses
Dext
Dext
Score 9.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Emburse Chrome River
Emburse Chrome River
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Emburse NexoniaTIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.6
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Emburse NexoniaTIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited for businesses where the billing goes based on time and expenses. Easy tracking and integration helps to solve the accounting entry flow in the accounting system. Less appropriate where there is only fixed fee billing and time tracking metrics are not much required.
Read full review
With this robust treasury tool it is very easy to increase the speed of financial operations with, for example, outgoing payments and cash flow analysis management. Liquidity is not a problem thanks to Treasury Intelligence Solutions, we are confident in this tool to fulfill the most important operations of outgoing payments. I can also recommend it because it is very simple to use and it also has a very simple application.
Read full review
Pros
  • The integration with NetSuite is well executed.
  • The system is intuitive for both users and approvers.
  • Ability to feed credit card data into the system is super helpful.
Read full review
  • Bank connectivity is as simple as it can be. Well designed making a complex process a little less complex than other providers.
  • Transaction support across 15 countries has been Steller. Broad support for methods and formats and issues were resolved quickly.
  • Solid systems interface make connecting with ERP and other systems relatively painless.
  • As noted earlier, quite flexible for a hosted service.
Read full review
Cons
  • The design interface isn't intuitive or attractive. Because I use it irregularly (less than once a month), I spend a lot of wasted time trying to remember how to use it.
  • If you have complicated submissions, it's challenging to figure out how to submit it correctly. I have to break each submission down into individual charges, although there's supposed to be a way to use a "split" feature or other features that would allow you to add multiple receipts to 1 day. After a year, I still haven't figured out how to use anything beyond one receipt = 1 submission.
Read full review
  • User-friendliness in some areas could be improved. A function that explains buttons would be nice, similar to how it is in SAP with F1. But indeed you can find this on the support portal.
  • It is missing the Business Discovery Manager. This will solve many questions, so I cannot complain if we are missing a critical dashboard part of TIS. The logic of Master data and download of the same is done nicely. I would like to build my own report with this, but we would be back to BDM functions.
  • The BTM transaction monitor is its greatest strength, but also is a large jungle of entries. You can get lost in there. The deletion function should be upgraded if possible, [because] it's not the easiest to do a mass deletion.
  • Filtering of accounts that need to be assigned to the BANK link. It's only a small thing but can be super annoying every time it selects the first bank entry by default.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Depends on stage of the project if it will be postponed in 2023. Se la vie. Will be happy to go on.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The main feature of usability is the outcome you get upon actions done. TIS is not complecated solution - it is rational and has most needed capabilites for cash management via multiple accounts in different jurisdictions. It works well for this task and evolutioning to the field of risk management to get all treasury job done well.
Read full review
Support Rating
I was not talking directly with the customer support. My understanding was that, there was some maintenance on the platform but it was never inconvenient for employee or during pick time when employee would put their expenses in the tool. To that extent, I think the support for Nexonia is correct
Read full review
Offered support information in the portal (knowledge base articles) as well members of the support provides a very good service level.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training addressed our needs.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The cloud connection meant less work for IT. The setup of the first 1000 accounts was very quick, so we went live after only 4 months.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
It captures receipts through the mobile app and is more convenient Easy to code time sheets and User-friendly and It will sync with Intacct and BILL for payments it greatly Improves suppliers and partner relationships it si very much Cost management it has good Product functionality and performance it helped in Overall cost reductions for small firms
Read full review
The implementation team is strong and supportive of your needs which was important. The solution fit the needs of company very well with many ERP systems and bank accounts. The company was continuing to improve its product based on customer feedback. Strong IT background at the top
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Nexonia Expenses has provided a positive impact on ROI because it saves time for employees who are submitting expenses for reimbursement.
  • Nexonia Expenses provides a positive impact on ROI because it saves time for employees who are issuing and managing POs.
Read full review
In terms of risk mitigation of course we can reduce the number of people having access to banking if not needed. With dedicated teams and less people with access to individual Bank portals. Before access to bank portals were necessary for all sorts of manual payments and exceptions if we really implement the 100% of functions and dont leave exceptions that risk mitigation can be achieved and efficiency at automated payment runs.
  • At a large corporation with more than 60 entities and 400+ bank accounts, the savings and improvements are massive considering how time-consuming the manual work would be. I don't have any numbers to quote, unfortunately.
  • We are now massively expanding our TIS with the full integration of automated payment runs. This has larger operational impacts, like the possible consolidation of banking and dedicated payment teams.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Emburse Nexonia Screenshots

Screenshot of Nexonia Mobile App