EPAY Systems vs. UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
EPAY Systems
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
EPAY Systems, a PrismHR Company, is a SaaS provider of human capital management technology and services designed to help medium to large businesses better manage their workforce. Their solutions include recruiting and applicant tracking, new hire onboarding, benefits administration, HR management, time tracking, workforce management, payroll processing, tax management, performance management, ACA reporting, and COBRA administration.N/A
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
UKG Workforce Central (formerly Kronos Workforce Central) was a suite of HR Management offerings targeted mainly at enterprise customers with larger-scale and more complex HR and workforce management issues. The product is discontinued.N/A
Pricing
EPAY SystemsUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EPAY SystemsUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EPAY SystemsUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
EPAY Systems
Chose EPAY Systems
EPAY is completely digital. There are no paper documents used. EPAY has a platform for the client. The client can actually log in and see their invoice and make changes to their payment method. Originally, we were using our internal company fee-charging service. This service …
Chose EPAY Systems
In my experience, EPAY Systems is the worst possible HR/Payroll system you could possibly select. I believe it's a scam.
Chose EPAY Systems
EPAY is more configurable and is better suited to our needs vs ADP's one size fits all product. PeopleSoft would need to be customized to handle all our union rules.
Chose EPAY Systems
Our main reason for switching to Blueforce is that we found the platform to be pretty promising and interactive than other alternatives. With other alternatives, there was one issue or another which just
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
UKG Workforce Central advertises itself as a more complete system, and it is. The main area of need for us at the time was the ability to manage overtime on the fly. It does that well enough.

The integration with job boards is just OK. It could be better as it is not as fluid …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
In comparison to Kronos, UKG Workforce Central offers an enhanced user experience. Employees are notified of their schedules for the coming weeks. The system allows users to view the work schedule of others on their team for that day, making shift swapping more convenient.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Most of the business simply used manual timesheets and Microsoft Excel to track time and attendance before we acquired UKG Workforce Central.
Obviously this method of tracking is very prone to user error and manipulation. UKG Workforce Central has been a revolution for us in …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We looked this product first and actually started the conversion process before we realized it could not do some essential functions we needed. One of the simple ones was allowing for employees to select to clock in or out and not just assume the direction based on their …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
UKG Workforce Central (formerly Kronos Workforce Central) is really an all-in-one solution that can be used to solve a myriad of issues: workforce management, scheduling, integration, self service, time and attendance, absenteeism, lateness, compliance, HR, payroll, data …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos Workforce Central is a robust software and is very easy for everyone to use. From management to employees, each person plays their part in using the software and our department was able to learn how to use it right away. We are constantly still learning new things but …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I used Oracle People Soft HCM for four years at my last organization and rarely had a good day with it. While I was not part of the selection process for Kronos as it was already in use at my new organization when I began there, I have found Kronos much simpler to use. Many of …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I'm just a user - not involved in the selection process.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Since I have been employed at my job, we have never used anything other than Kronos Workforce Central and it's perfect for what we need. I believe it was selected before I became an employee here and I know that the process of finding products, this one would have been chosen …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos Workforce Central had a more straightforward way to use it and a more user-friendly platform. Kronos Workforce Central had better pricing than UltiPro.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos Workforce Central and Calabrio One are used for two completely different tasks, so it's hard to compare the two.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We believe ADP would have been easier to implement but Kronos was more cost-effective.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We have had Kronos timekeeping for many years, and before this we used a very manual process. I was not a part of the team that chose the Kronos timekeeping system, so I really cannot say what other systems were considered for this application, if any. Kronos has done the job …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
The company implemented Kronos long before I took my role, but I have been present for the upgrades to the system. I have also used other versions of Kronos in my past roles. Workforce Central is definitely the more modernized version of Kronos. It definitely has its issues, …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
There were some functionalities in Kronos that we needed that the other systems did not have readily available or easily deployable.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos is the only company that isn’t company owned that I’ve used. I’ve used it at two different companies and really enjoy it.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We evaluated Paychex, Paycor, and Kronos and ending up choosing Kronos essentially because they had the best salespeople.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)

Kronos and Dayforce are the two timekeeping systems I’ve worked with in recent years. Kronos feels a little more comprehensive and is my primary timekeeping tool both for myself as well as my staff. Kronos is a great tool for a wide range of shifts, working locations, and pay …

Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
During my tenure at my organization we've only used Kronos and have not considered moving to another application to document employee time.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
KRONOS is by far one of the best, if not THE best multi-faceted systems I have used. Right up there with ADP but slightly better for what I needed it for.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Other than Kronos, I've only used Oracle Peoplesoft HCM for time and attendance. In comparing the two, I find that Kronos is far more high-end and busy and complicated, whereas PeopleSoft is simpler and to the point. With Kronos, there is some refining to do to it to get the …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Can't compare. Quickbooks was easy, but lacked functional reporting which is essential to manage employee time.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
WFC was and still is - the best single point HR/PR and Timekeeping system on the market - bottom line.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I have not been involved in the product selection process.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I've worked with this when it was called e-time. Nowhere near as good as Kronos.
Features
EPAY SystemsUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
2.2
Ratings
112% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
2.9
Ratings
93% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors2.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
2.5
Ratings
105% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Approval workflow2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Balance details3.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
2.9
Ratings
94% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information3.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Update personal information3.30 Ratings00 Ratings
View company policy documentation2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
3.0
Ratings
86% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Report builder3.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-built reports2.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data3.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
2.1
Ratings
116% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
New hire portal2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
2.2
Ratings
113% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Individual goal setting2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance tracking2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
1.9
Ratings
122% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Performance plans2.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Review status tracking2.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Review reminders2.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
EPAY Systems
1.9
Ratings
121% below category average
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Company Website Posting2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
EPAY SystemsUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Dayforce Powerpay
Dayforce Powerpay
Score 9.5 out of 10
When I Work
When I Work
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EPAY SystemsUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EPAY SystemsUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for Payroll needs. I cannot speak top other aspects, however, they do provide great customer service and the system is easy to utilize for end users.
Read full review
We use Kronos Workforce Central only for it's timekeeping and scheduling/forecasting capabilities. It absolutely meets our needs for these areas. The reporting functionality also serves us well; exporting reports in excel covers the needs for most teams that use the system. Finally, business leaders and local HR crews are able to run reports on the teams they support.
Read full review
Pros
  • I believe the ONLY thing EPAY does well is lie.
  • In my experience, they are Terrible, and nothing works well at all.
Read full review
  • As a full service hospital there can be demands of staff to respond to high census or staffing shortages. Kronos has offered great utilization in floating hours between units and departments, identifying direct or indirect patient care hours, and ultimately offering analytics to clinical and operational leaders. This ability to specifically move hours while at work is exceptional for reporting and planning purposes across the organization.
  • The self-managed and leader managed options of an employee’s time card is of huge benefit. As a 24/7 hour operation it is critical that each individual is accountable for their own timekeeping. Kronos allows each employee to manage and submit adjustment, updates, and changes while at work without having to have their manager do it for them. The proceeding approval/acceptance process with these changes is well established and easy to authenticate.
  • The ability to access and navigate the user interface is very friendly and forgiving. Other systems can be quite cumbersome and hard to navigate, update, and easily change, but Kronos is pretty straight forward both for users and administrators. This ability to easily orient new team members and managers has been a great benefit to the organization.
Read full review
Cons
  • All-time punches are rounded to 15-minute intervals which can skew accurate break times.
  • Slow lading or occasional lags due to server overload.
  • Sync errors cause occasional overlapping punches.
Read full review
  • Training required to use the product effectively, not simple at first
  • Dependent on Java, frequent updates to Java necessary to continue using the Kronos platform
  • Reporting tools are extensive and solid, though some reports can only be extracted in PDF, not in the more usable Excel format. How Kronos determines which can be extracted in Excel vs. PDF, I can't tell.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Now that the system is installed and operational, the "pain is gone"...therefore we see no reason to change to a different application. There is no functionality that is missing from the system that would drive us to consider another solution at this time. Maintenance support from Kronos is sufficient and updates occur regularly.
Read full review
Usability
Because I can't give it a Zero, I believe EPAY Systems is the most senseless system I have ever used. I worked on systems over 25 years ago that were better. In my opinion, there is no logic to the programming; the system is unbelievably SLOW, and there and hundreds of problems every week. And major ones that they will not or can not correct. For example, we can not file or access employee records in the system as it can take longer than 10 minutes to view or load one document for one employee - IF the system allows you to get that far, which it usually doesn't.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I feel the support is terrible. We have an outsourced support purpose who doesn't understand the EPAY Systems or our company, [removed], will only answer the first thing mentioned even if there is an entire list. Then the answer does not solve the 1st problem on the list or any other and has no idea how to help us. We have requested a replacement and were told we would get one, then told later we would not. I believe while the support person is nice, I believe they were not trained or supported on their end, and effectiveness is probably 1% or less, takes forever, and is only on the minor issues.
Read full review
Kronos Workforce Central's support is amazing! From the support the software alone gives our department to the customer service team, we have never been more thorough as we are now. There are plenty of trainings provided and assistance is always there when you need it. The launching process was very detailed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
EPAY is completely digital. There are no paper documents used. EPAY has a platform for the client. The client can actually log in and see their invoice and make changes to their payment method. Originally, we were using our internal company fee-charging service. This service was paper-based and required manual entry into the tracking system. There were no automatic follow-up emails to unpaid accounts. Tracking the total fees charged was arduous and EPAY makes it simple and clean.
Read full review
We looked this product first and actually started the conversion process before we realized it could not do some essential functions we needed. One of the simple ones was allowing for employees to select to clock in or out and not just assume the direction based on their schedule or last punch. With bus drivers working multiple routes or shifts this was imperative that they be able to select this as while they may forget one punch being able to select the direction helps identify where the missing punches are. I'm hoping this has since been corrected because it absolutely floored me that such a relatively simple thing was not an option.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Labor costs have been lowered.
  • Operations have become more efficient. Payroll is processing at 99.6% accuracy.
  • Operational efficiencies realized by cutting processing times.
Read full review
  • Kronos is much more expensive than the previous systems we were using, so at this point the ROI is negative. The idea is that it will allow us to scale and grow the company more easily so time will tell if that is the case.
Read full review
ScreenShots

EPAY Systems Screenshots

Screenshot of Timesheet Details