Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling vs. WebMD PracticePro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epic Cadence
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Epic Cadence is the company's medical scheduling module.N/A
WebMD PracticePro
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Epic Cadence Enterprise SchedulingWebMD PracticePro
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epic CadenceWebMD PracticePro
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epic Cadence Enterprise SchedulingWebMD PracticePro
Considered Both Products
Epic Cadence
Chose Epic Cadence
Centricity was limited in ability to scale and customize compared to Cadence for our environment. Also the regular updates for Cadence vs. Centricity is where Cadence really shines. Vendor support is also much better with Cadence over Centricity. We also like the robust …
Chose Epic Cadence
From an enterprise level I would put Cadence at the top of the pack. Compared to many smaller scheduling systems there are less pages to jump through. Scheduling is straightforward and much easier to accomplish.
Chose Epic Cadence
I personally did not select the application, the organization have. Most of the time, I find out that healthcare facilities who have been using many of Epic's application invites or gets a request to be visited by other healthcare organizations thinking of getting the EMR …
Chose Epic Cadence
Cadence is much better than some of the other either text based, or web based solutions out there. Cadence should be used as part of the complete Epic Enterprise package to enjoy the cost benefits of a fully integrated system that maintains the entire Patient Access flow within …
Chose Epic Cadence

Our old legacy system was another vendor system interfaced to the current AD system. If was strictly a scheduling system, it did not pass information other than an account number to the ADT system for registration purposes so was very limited in what it could do beyond …

Chose Epic Cadence
I have had experiance with allscripts in the past and I feel like Cadance is more advanceed and more accurate with capturing patient information and communicating the information back to Epic and our care teams. Cadance has helped us cutomize our Epic system so that we can tack …
WebMD PracticePro

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Epic Cadence Enterprise SchedulingWebMD PracticePro
Small Businesses
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epic Cadence Enterprise SchedulingWebMD PracticePro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epic Cadence Enterprise SchedulingWebMD PracticePro
Likelihood to Recommend
Cadence Enterprise Scheduling is well suited when an organization would like to have one EMR system. It is not appropriate when implementing only one application.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Visual interface (GUI) that is better than most of the competition out there.
  • Integration with all other Epic modules, allowing for the entire Patient Access flow to be contained within one system.
  • More power and administrative roles are given to the users rather than the IT staff, providing easier maintenance of the product.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Faster for users with keyboard only access if preferred.
  • Overall faster performance of system interface access.
  • Web-based application with full features.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
As stated earlier, it seems to be the best out there, from a built perspective as well as a user application. While some practices feel it to be time consuming (Cadence/Prelude) together others who see the whole integration thru the Epicare and Resolute systems love it. From an IT perspective, while sometimes cumbersome to build, the end results are pleasing and satisfying. We can usually accomplish what we set out to do with the practice vision in mind.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
EPIC has been great in their support and communication at all hours. They also openly communicate when an application TS (Technical Support) will be away and who is covering for that person. During standard non working hours - you always know what number and who to call to get resolution to issues that arise at those times
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
EPI webinars are most informative and not a long drawn out presentation. It also offer screen shots and practice tools.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Use implementation team from EPIC but know what you want and make sure that it=s what you get. You can be easily swayed by lack of knowledge on the application and therefore decisions are made that are not correct and then have to be redone. EPIC including Cadence needs a great understanding of the workflows you currently have and how they will be impacted by your build. We had a great understanding of the existing workflows in the offices, however lack of knowledge on the Cadence IT side, had a large impact on what was delivered as our implementers believed that a standard EPIC workflow would suffice and did not.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
From an enterprise level I would put Cadence at the top of the pack. Compared to many smaller scheduling systems there are less pages to jump through. Scheduling is straightforward and much easier to accomplish.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots