Epic vs. Practice Fusion

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Epic offers a suite of medical practice management and EHR software.N/A
Practice Fusion
Score 2.5 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$149
per month per provider with a required annual commitment
Pricing
EpicPractice Fusion
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
3 signing staff licenses & unlimited non-signing staff licenses
$149
per month per provider with a required annual commitment
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EpicPractice Fusion
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EpicPractice Fusion
Considered Both Products
Epic
Chose Epic
Epic gives extensive customization options in terms of utility and view. I have found this to be highly useful and efficient EHR as compared to other EHRs we use in our organization.
Chose Epic
Epic has more features and seems to be used by most hospital systems, which means information can be shared between systems. It is not compatible with Cerner, McKesson, or any other of the less commonly used products and we cannot view information from such facilities. I …
Chose Epic
Epic has extensive features, options, customization and is truly a robust EMR software. As a user I can tell there has been much thought and effort into creating this software and they are constantly updating the technology to keep it user friendly. Epic can do more than any …
Chose Epic
All of the EHR's I have worked with are strong in their own right, however, Epic really shines in an Enterprise level situation. Most EHR's are specific to one context, like hospital, lab, or clinic. Epic has a great deal of strength in unifying all of these different contexts …
Practice Fusion
Chose Practice Fusion
I think it came down to cost, which I regret now.
Chose Practice Fusion
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, …
Chose Practice Fusion
It wasn't really a choice for me- I used the chiropractic specific when working for chiropractors and then used Practice Fusion while I was working for an alternative healthcare doctor.
The doctors all had chosen the software before signing me on, there wasn't really an option …
Chose Practice Fusion
NextGen is hard to use as far as medical records. Practice Fusion is user friendly. There is a great knowledge base for questions asked. Practice Fusion takes all the guess work out of the day.
Chose Practice Fusion
Practice fusion is much more user friendly than the other programs that we have used. The more costly EMR's were definitely no better and the ones we have used were not nearly as easy to use. I would highly recommend practice fusion over Athena or Allscripts.
Chose Practice Fusion
I personally would recommend Cerner over all other EMRs due to the ability to customize and navigate through the system.
Features
EpicPractice Fusion
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Practice Fusion
8.2
Ratings
8% above category average
Real-time eligibility verification9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Claims management9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Coding9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Patient billing9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Financial Reporting9.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.7
Ratings
20% above category average
Practice Fusion
5.2
Ratings
41% below category average
Rule-based scheduling10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Multi-location support10.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Calendar interface8.30 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.9
Ratings
31% above category average
Practice Fusion
6.4
Ratings
13% below category average
Charting / document management10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Templates10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Patient portal10.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support10.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Fax integration10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems10.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Workflow automation10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Speech recognition10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customization9.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
E-prescribing10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Epic
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Practice Fusion
7.2
Ratings
15% below category average
HIPAA compliance10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels10.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy10.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe10.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Practice Fusion
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Task tracking9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows9.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
EpicPractice Fusion
Small Businesses
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
eClinicalWorks
eClinicalWorks
Score 9.9 out of 10
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EpicPractice Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EpicPractice Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
Epic is very good on the medical side and continues improving mental health and dental care. Having integrated telehealth via Zoom was a game-changer. During COVID, it was vital to have telehealth options and to ensure it was completely HIPAA Compliant and easy to document inside their health record.
Read full review
I think this is a great tool for a smaller practice, and I really like that it is not practice-specific. It seems like any type of doctor could use the site. I also think this is really great for remote workers because you are able to log on via the internet. I think that this tool would not be good for those looking to have a specific practice software. I've worked for other doctors alongside the one I used practice fusion for, and the other doctors used specialty specific software because of the customization to their job and charting.
Read full review
Pros
  • Updated technology. Epic consistently stays up to date and advances their technology and features.
  • Shortcuts, templates, and smart phrases help to make using the software easier and faster with accuracy.
  • Intuitive user interface. Epic has put a lot of thought into the design and function of the software and has ensured that it is user friendly.
Read full review
  • Organizes lab work for each patient. Its helpful for us to see a patient at a glance.
  • Schedule appointments for patients.
Read full review
Cons
  • Difficult to find what you need.
  • Almost impossible to correct mistakes.
  • Multiple screens must be navigated to get to what you want.
Read full review
  • One of the biggest frustrations is that PF only imports PDFs of lab results, but does nothing to allow manipulation of the numbers within these PDFs. I can pull up lab results but can't look at a graph, for example, of trends in serum sodium or hematocrit.
  • Like EPIC, it would be nice to have an option like scrolling to all the "***"s using F2, which I always try to do on PF until I realize it does not work.
  • I wish PF had more dot phrases to pull in things like lab results, etc., into the note. Since I cannot copy and paste lab results (which are stored in PDF) or blow them in with a dot phrase, I have to manually re-write them, which leaves our notes more vulnerable to human error. If this feature DOES exist, it isn't obvious to me or anyone in our clinic.
  • It would be really nice to hear from PF support to see if we had any unmet needs in the clinic so that they could educate us on how to better use this EMR to support those needs.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is beyond measure the best EHR on the market.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
My organization has been using the Epic platform for 10 years and counting! Epic has continuously improved and updated the system to align with current best practices and meet the needs of members and their patients. As an FQHC, we provide medical, dental, and mental health services, and it is essential to have access to all the patients' health information in one place. Integrating Care Everywhere and Telehealth options embedded directly in the EHR has greatly improved our ability to take the best care of each patient who walks through our doors.
Read full review
In my opinion and experience, they have a lack of customization so you have to constantly create hacks to make their system work for your practice.
Read full review
Support Rating
A dedicated support staff for each module/area is provided by Epic. This is beneficial for points of contact, however, not all support staff are created equal, and there seems to be high turnover in these roles(staff seems to turn over every 1-2 years). This can make it challenging for continuity and quick support resolution as new staff are not as familiar with organization-specific needs, environments, and/or questions.
Read full review
We always get a return call within the time stated. There are many available topics on the forum and it is often easy to find the issue you are seeking more information on. When we have tried the live chat feature we have been satisfied with the timeliness and response.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Well-vetted lesson plans that teach you what you need to know for success.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
While not as effective as in-person training, it is still adequate.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Epic has a regimented implementation process that ensures a successful go-live.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Epic has more features and seems to be used by most hospital systems, which means information can be shared between systems. It is not compatible with Cerner, McKesson, or any other of the less commonly used products and we cannot view information from such facilities. I believe Epic has the most features. It automatically saves entries, unlike Quadrimed, for example, which does not save and if you accidentally get logged out you lose your information.
Read full review
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, visits to other health facilities, and past notes. It also had so many more ways you could format your notes, blow in data, and statistically analyze data. While EPIC is a much more comprehensive and well-supported EMR, it also would be too heavy and unnecessary for the small scale clinic work I do at a community clinic. I feel that each EMR has the environment they are well-suited for, and I am glad to be using PF now.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Improved Customer Satisfaction: After the initial implementation phase, I have seen increases in patient satisfaction. This is due to the increased transparency regarding their care as well as an increase in paid claims.
  • Increased Revenue: In some cases I have seen Medicare denial rates drop from high 80's and 90's down to single digits. I have seen incredible jumps in the time payment is received from an approved claim.
Read full review
  • PRO -- I know now what I need in an EMR/EHR
  • CONS -- They have overcharged me and it has cost me money
  • CONS-- They have disregarded my legal rights which makes me unsure of keeping confidential info in their systems and it will cost me money to switch
  • CONS--They have cost me money with the time I've wasted to follow up on my own tickets that they refuse to follow up with
Read full review
ScreenShots