Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum is a cloud-based construction ERP suite with project management, accounting, resource management, and reporting and analytics. Key features include workflow automation and collaboration tools, document imaging and sharing, cost estimating tools, and RFI management tools.
N/A
Pricing
Epicor Kinetic
Viewpoint Spectrum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor Kinetic
Viewpoint Spectrum
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Prospective buyers may contact vendor directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor Kinetic
Viewpoint Spectrum
Features
Epicor Kinetic
Viewpoint Spectrum
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.4
Ratings
3% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.0
Ratings
36% below category average
Pay calculation
7.70 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.70 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.30 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.3
Ratings
36% below category average
API for custom integration
9.00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability
9.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
Ratings
22% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
3.6
Ratings
67% below category average
Dashboards
9.00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Standard reports
9.00 Ratings
3.30 Ratings
Custom reports
9.00 Ratings
2.50 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.4
Ratings
17% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking
9.00 Ratings
5.10 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.90 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Location management
9.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.9
Ratings
12% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing
9.00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Order entry
9.00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.20 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
9.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Billing Management
9.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.70 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.90 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Period Close
8.20 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
Ratings
19% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
9% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.7
Ratings
3% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.60 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
5.40 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.20 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
7.30 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
Ratings
16% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
12% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.70 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.70 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
6.00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
19% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
Ratings
9% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
Ratings
26% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Forecasting
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor ERP is great for manufacturing companies, whether you make the same widget every time or if you a make custom widgets, this ERP system can handle it. If you have multiple plants, or multiple companies, Epicor ERP can handle it. Works in the US and internationally also. I do not think the EPR system would be the best choice if you are a distributor or a retailer.
Viewpoint Spectrum would be fine for small to medium-sized companies. It would be great for transitioning from an in-house paper-based process, especially since it's designed with small construction companies in mind. They're making it even easier for smaller companies by offering additional features that you'd normally have to find in other products. However, companies can easily outgrow this system. We have about 15 years of data in the system, over 300 active jobs, and nearly 1,500 employees. In the past 3 years we've noticed slower performance and frequent locks in the system that require intervention from a system administrator. We moved to the cloud about 2 years ago and this has made troubleshooting even more difficult as we don't have the same access that we did before to resolve performance issues.
Our version evolved from Vantage, and to be honest, I'm not really impressed yet. I've seen good examples so am aware it's due to implementation errors, rather than Epicor shortcomings.
Unfortunately, our version of the product configurator is very slow.
The need for well educated/trained consultants to get a proper implementation should be addressed well by Epicor, as this also determines user experience to a great extent. There is no true fall-back for improper implementation.
Maybe this was really smooth, but it seemed like implementation was a lot of work. As part of a 4 person implementation team, it took us a month or so of going through tutorials, the help files, and meeting with Epicor consultants to learn how we wanted to use Epicor (that month was pretty light, maybe 5-6 hours per week for each of us). Then it took about 3 months setting up Epicor to meet our needs. (The 4 of us each worked 25-30 hours a week during those 3 months on the implementation since we still had production work to do)
Epicor can be overwhelming for new users. Our normal users have a hard time at first getting used to it because there is so much to see, learn and do in it, epecially for people with less technical expertise.
As the person on the implementation team in charge of customizations, my biggest complaint is the lack of documentation on programming in Epicor. While they do have great documentation on how to use many of their built in customization tools, they give you the ability to write code in C# that should allow you to do anything. But, there is very little to no documentation on the API (Application Programming Interface). Most other programs will have a large help file where users can see the thousands of functions available to program within the system with info on what the functions do, how they are accessed and what inputs they need and sample code for each function. With Epicor.. nope, nothing. Maybe if you buy their SDK for another $24,000 they will have a help file included with that. I don't know.
Subcontract Kiosk can be glitchy - allows subs to overbill on subcontract billing items
Document Imaging can be glitchy - often says users do not have adequate security to view/add documents, but they do - if they sign out and back in, it works fine
At times, support can be lacking - sometimes case responses are delayed or you get an incorrect answer
I give this rating because the software has good functionality and usability. The system does not crash and can also be maintained under overall conditions in any business function. We utilize this to communicate effectively in various areas and make informed business decisions. This is highly rated as we make other changes to our organization
Some things in Spectrum are NOT that intuitive, but I think knowledge of the software just comes with time. There are still some things I need assistance with in Spectrum but I'm very comfortable with my day to day items now that I've been using it for years. However, if there is something I don't do often or haven't done before, I don't find the software to be that intuitive, I actually find the logic on some things to be a little weird but it's fine once I know how to do it.
For the most part the product is very reliable. Since we are hosted we sometimes have connectivity issues but I would say that is more our ISP than Spectrum.
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
The support has recently changed. Last year, you could call in and get an immediate response. Now that doesn't seem possible unless you have an urgent situation with access to the software, payroll or payables. I have found that using chat or e-mail works nicely for the most part, but sometimes I feel it would be easier if someone from support would jump on our site and take a first-hand look rather than going back and forth
Our trainer was excellent and navigated the time zone differences expertly. She gave us test assignments to complete and was available for questions at any time.
Epicor ERP has similar functionality to Made2Manage, but is much more flexible and has significantly more additional modules and support available. Versus PeopleSoft, it becomes an unfair comparison, as Epicor is mid-market and PeopleSoft is large-market. Having said that, Epicor is easier to both implement and use, but has far less flexibility. IQMS is the biggest competitor if in the manufacturing space, particularly injection molding, as IQMS is fast becoming a de-facto "standard".
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project management system compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate. Spectrum, when compared to CMIC, I believe they are equal. CMiC has a better project management system, but Spectrum has an easier accounting system to navigate.
At first, it is difficult to convince every one of its immense capabilities but once the scalability is tapped into some it becomes easier to show and convince how well suited the system is for many disciplines. With constant upgrades and updates, there really just isn't a limit to what can be accomplished.
You can grant user specific access which is nice. Project managers do not need all the same modules as Accounting. But Accounting does need access to PM modules as well
Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us the opportunity to be proactive in analyzing the costs for a project in time to make a difference in the outcome of the project. It has allowed us defense in supporting our communications with the project owners.
Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us to become more productive with its accounting software and the cohesion between the modules. It has definitely streamlined the processing necessary to account for the business.