Epicor Kinetic vs. Weelo

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor Kinetic
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.N/A
Weelo
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Weelo is a B2B enterprise solution that manages operations of multiple sales channels from warehouse to cash collection. Weelo is designed to help manufacturers and distributors manage and streamline their sales and distribution processes in real time.
$15
per month per user
Pricing
Epicor KineticWeelo
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
$15
per month per user
Premium
$20
per month per user
Basic
$25
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor KineticWeelo
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrice varies depending on the number of users
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor KineticWeelo
Considered Both Products
Epicor Kinetic
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor Kinetic is better and has more features directed towards our business.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Can’t really compare the 2. This is not a good representation because one is for parts management and the other for expenses that occur with the every day of being a business.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Historically we used Epicor for many years. It is solid ERP software with many handy modules that provide all that we need for our business processes. Currently, we also use AdaptUX and CRM.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor ERP lacks some of the main functions that a software like Salesforce offers. The main difference is the ERP versus the cloud of marketing and sales benefits you get with Salesforce. Epicor is great for an ERP, but lacks in marketing and sales.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor's support structure, pricing, and licensing models fit our needs better at the moment.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
We evaluated a couple of different products. Overall I think that Epicor has similar features to the other ERP offerings out there at this level. The thing that I like the best about Epicor is the tools used to modify the software. Just about every aspect of the software is …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
As of the time we last used Profit key, Epicor was a massive upgrade and a lot more versatile. The difference Epicor has made in the business would not have been achievable with the old ProfitKey software we were using. I honestly don't know that there is a fair comparison as …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
We chose Epicor because of its flexibility and ability to customize on the fly. We evaluated 3 other vendors, but none of them offered the flexibility that Epicor has.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Was down to Epicor and Infor SyteLine for our final two and had our core team privately write which they wanted and why. Summing it up best was one of the responses: If you want what is familiar and like your legacy system, go with SyteLine, but if you want all the bells and …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor ERP has similar functionality to Made2Manage, but is much more flexible and has significantly more additional modules and support available. Versus Peoplesoft, it becomes an unfair comparison, as Epicor is mid-market and Peoplesoft is large-market. Having said that, …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
I was not with the company when the selection was performed
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Baxter had been on an inhouse designed and programmed ERP system, then we were purchased and moved onto a mainframe with a customized ERP system. The decision to move off the mainframe was made and we started looking at a replacement system. I put together a list of 10 EPR …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor is more reliable, M2M was a little easier to use but not as powerful.
Chose Epicor Kinetic

With my former employer, we used ISAH-7, including couplings to Autocad (with BOM-integration) and Account View for financial reporting. At this company, I was also doing on-site support and report updates and year-closing, which would normally cost me just 4-5 working days. …

Chose Epicor Kinetic
Everyone at our organization really appreciated "made 2 manage" because of all of the quick access and some of the capabilities in accounting. So far, Epicor is much more advanced but the two can stand side by side. These two programs cannot really be compared just because it's …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Vista 4 was a very basic system that did not require people to put in very much detail. This was ok in the earlier years of the company because our regulations weren't as strict and we weren't as concerned about the traceability of items. With our growing company we had to be …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
We looked at a ton of other systems, but we picked Epicor because it had the most functionality that we wanted out of the box, and with the ability to customize everything. Some other packages had even better customization but less out of the box functionality. Epicor had a …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Other than Microsoft Dynamics it's more complete and user-friendly. Also, the ROI was better than Microsoft Dynamics. When all departments reviewed the offerings is Epicor was a better fit than the other 4. The interface was easier to use meaning we got up to speed faster. The …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor has been in use here for 15+ years so the "history" of evaluating other systems has been lost to the mists of time. In the view of this evaluator Epicor ERP is at the least the equal, if not superior, of any enterprise level Tier 1 ERP system and is built on the most …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
As an accountant, I prefer QuickBooks or M3 accounting. I did not select Epicor.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
While these systems are not probably equivalent to Epicor, I found that all of them seemed to fail in the same area, many business processes were not supported in the software and users had to resort to manual processes or unintegrated databases. I think Epicor does a very good …
Weelo

No answer on this topic

Features
Epicor KineticWeelo
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.4
Ratings
3% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
API for custom integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.0
Ratings
22% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Dashboards9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Accounts payable9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.4
Ratings
17% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.9
Ratings
12% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Pricing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Billing Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
Ratings
19% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
11% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
Ratings
16% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
19% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
Ratings
9% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Production Process Design9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
Ratings
26% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Forecasting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
6% above category average
Weelo
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor KineticWeelo
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor KineticWeelo
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor KineticWeelo
Likelihood to Recommend
Epicor ERP is great for manufacturing companies, whether you make the same widget every time or if you a make custom widgets, this ERP system can handle it. If you have multiple plants, or multiple companies, Epicor ERP can handle it. Works in the US and internationally also. I do not think the EPR system would be the best choice if you are a distributor or a retailer.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Our version evolved from Vantage, and to be honest, I'm not really impressed yet. I've seen good examples so am aware it's due to implementation errors, rather than Epicor shortcomings.
  • Unfortunately, our version of the product configurator is very slow.
  • The need for well educated/trained consultants to get a proper implementation should be addressed well by Epicor, as this also determines user experience to a great extent. There is no true fall-back for improper implementation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Maybe this was really smooth, but it seemed like implementation was a lot of work. As part of a 4 person implementation team, it took us a month or so of going through tutorials, the help files, and meeting with Epicor consultants to learn how we wanted to use Epicor (that month was pretty light, maybe 5-6 hours per week for each of us). Then it took about 3 months setting up Epicor to meet our needs. (The 4 of us each worked 25-30 hours a week during those 3 months on the implementation since we still had production work to do)
  • Epicor can be overwhelming for new users. Our normal users have a hard time at first getting used to it because there is so much to see, learn and do in it, epecially for people with less technical expertise.
  • As the person on the implementation team in charge of customizations, my biggest complaint is the lack of documentation on programming in Epicor. While they do have great documentation on how to use many of their built in customization tools, they give you the ability to write code in C# that should allow you to do anything. But, there is very little to no documentation on the API (Application Programming Interface). Most other programs will have a large help file where users can see the thousands of functions available to program within the system with info on what the functions do, how they are accessed and what inputs they need and sample code for each function. With Epicor.. nope, nothing. Maybe if you buy their SDK for another $24,000 they will have a help file included with that. I don't know.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I give this rating because the software has good functionality and usability. The system does not crash and can also be maintained under overall conditions in any business function. We utilize this to communicate effectively in various areas and make informed business decisions. This is highly rated as we make other changes to our organization
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Epicor ERP has similar functionality to Made2Manage, but is much more flexible and has significantly more additional modules and support available. Versus PeopleSoft, it becomes an unfair comparison, as Epicor is mid-market and PeopleSoft is large-market. Having said that, Epicor is easier to both implement and use, but has far less flexibility. IQMS is the biggest competitor if in the manufacturing space, particularly injection molding, as IQMS is fast becoming a de-facto "standard".
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
At first, it is difficult to convince every one of its immense capabilities but once the scalability is tapped into some it becomes easier to show and convince how well suited the system is for many disciplines. With constant upgrades and updates, there really just isn't a limit to what can be accomplished.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Getting better information from custom reports
  • Getting better information from modules because they require employees to enter more information and have more fields for them to enter information
  • Making some repeat processes quicker, so users can get done with tasks quicker
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Epicor Kinetic Screenshots

Screenshot of Production MonitoringScreenshot of Role-Based Analytics and Business IntelligenceScreenshot of Planning and SchedulingScreenshot of Shipping and ReceivingScreenshot of the General LedgerScreenshot of Training and Development

Weelo Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of