Epicor HCM supplied human resource management system (HRMS) capabilities, but Epicor has stopped offering this functionality and company's HR applications are no longer available.
N/A
Rippling
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Rippling’s platform for HR, IT, payroll, and spend management automates the entire employee lifecycle, ensures compliance, supports device management, and provides real-time financial visibility from a central dashboard.
$8
starting price per user, per month
Pricing
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
Rippling
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Recommended
$8.00
starting price per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
Rippling
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
For additional pricing details visit the Rippling pricing page.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
Rippling
Features
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
Rippling
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Rippling
9.2
Ratings
16% above category average
Employee demographic data
10.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Employment history
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Organizational charting
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Organization and location management
10.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Rippling
9.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Pay calculation
10.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
10.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
10.00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Direct deposit files
10.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Reimbursement management
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
9.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Rippling
9.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Approval workflow
10.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Balance details
8.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
9.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
9.8
Ratings
19% above category average
Rippling
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
9.00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Update personal information
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
View company policy documentation
10.00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Employee recognition
10.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
View job history
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
Rippling
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Rippling
9.1
Ratings
19% above category average
Report builder
8.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Pre-built reports
6.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
7.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Rippling
9.4
Ratings
17% above category average
New hire portal
10.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
10.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Rippling
9.2
Ratings
15% above category average
Corporate goal setting
10.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Individual goal setting
10.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Performance tracking
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
16% above category average
Rippling
9.3
Ratings
17% above category average
Performance plans
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
10.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Review status tracking
10.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Review reminders
7.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Epicor HCM (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
25% above category average
Rippling
9.1
Ratings
15% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
10.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Candidate ranking
10.00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Candidate search
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Candidate development
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
I could not recommend this system to anyone. If you do decide to go with this system, depending on organization size, you'll need at least one dedicated IT person with SQL/Report-builder experience to manage the system and reporting, as well as another full-time HR member to manage other administrative set-up and deal with the many, many, user support issues that will crop up. I'm shocked at the number of positive reviews for this product. A couple of them reiterate the same thing such as each of use (which is completely untrue) and many fields/tables for data storage, which leads me to believe that they're from Epicor or Epicor consultants
I highly recommend Rippling for any company, regardless of its size. Many well-known companies trust it, and if you go onto their LinkedIn page, you will likely find that many of your friends and colleagues are already familiar with them. Along with a highly flexible and easy-to-use UI, many other companies use it, making it feel like a small world. Any company that needs software for expense management and payroll and wants consistency should consider using Rippling.
Timesheets show everything that time has been charged to in a quick glance. There is a lot of information displayed onscreen and is very easy to decipher.
Employees charge their time on a well-designed front end program, and data is gleaned from that and dispersed into the various timekeeping and expense tracking modules.
The abilities to charge time to direct, indirect and downtime are all valuable- see where time is being spent and use it as a coaching tool.
I did not expect Live Chat Support and Email Support when we moved to Rippling. Their Support team is quick and very knowledgeable. I have had multiple instances where we have gone back and forth on a situation to come to the correct conclusion, never feeling they were trying to just close the case unsolved.
Being able to manage employees from application to separation is huge. Having a built in ATS that we can hire candidates from directly, and immediately have their payroll, benefits and employee profile setup has saved me countless hours for each hire.
Rippling allows us to manage retirement plans across the US, Canada and UK with automation and file feeds. Before Rippling I manually managed these in multiple portals, now Rippling does it for me automatically.
Compliance is one area that needs further attention. For example in candidate self-service, the admin and managers can see the candidate's demographic information as part of their application, which shouldn't happen. If an internal candidate applies for a job, the hiring manager automatically gets access to that employee's record just like their regular manager.
On the timesheets module, there are issues with CA specific OT calculation rules on a bi-weekly payroll, where it does not calculate OT for time worked in excess of 5 consecutive days. Also, the application has random (but rare) occurrences where it resets the time zone to the server time zone for users that clock-in/ out.
Customizations that require professional services contracts can be somewhat difficult in terms of getting resources assigned. When upgrading the system to a new version, the admin has to conduct its own testing, including all and any customizations made to the system and then work with Epicor on resolving any issues.
Customer Support structure could be better. Currently there is no official filtering of issues and expected response time for different kinds of issues, except for system access. When offering payroll and time keeping, the customer support should reflect reduced time for resolution of issues in these time sensitive areas.
User training. Epicor HCM offers no free training, aside from webinars on new version releases. While they do offer training sessions, users have to pay for it. From a customer perspective this is difficult to accept. You pay to purchase the system/ module, but if you want to learn how to use it, you have to pay again.
It is hard to think of ways that Rippling could improve. The one area that we did have a bit of a slowdown was in the onboarding process. It was not intuitive and we expect to have some learning curve so if I could say anything needs improvement it would be this area.
I just recently lost my job after 16 years, and purposely sought out a position where I could continue to work with HCM. I am now in a similar role to what I was in before, and can continue the same type of work and enhancements that I did at my other company.
Rippling continues to innovate and amaze me with their new innovations and features. Product feedback is taken seriously so I always give it whenever I can and end up seeing results. Rippling is the new wave of HRIS that cannot compare against others in the industry just due to the fact they are super user friendly!
Where it's good: Epicor HCM at a high level has a straight-forward interface for navigating to the main content sections at either the employee or HR administrator level. The interfaces are consistent throughout the application, and after a brief learning curve, one can navigate through the remainder of the interface pages in any content area without too much difficulty. HCM also has great tools for making sure the analysis of data is available and accessible to non-programmer personnel. Where it struggles: One thing working against the usability of the HCM product is the overuse of the row-selection scheme for all many to many relationships. HCM uses a "select the row from the left frame" and then "enter data corresponding to this row in the right frame" scheme for most of its data entry components. One example of overuse is the employee address entry. During the first setup of an employee or during a candidate's application, HCM allows the user to specify multiple addresses. While this functionality is desired for long-term storage, an option doesn't exist to forgo this interface type for quick initial entry for the primary use case (one address per employee). This is one example, but is particularly visible when a candidate must also bridge the learning curve.
Rippling is a great product that has streamlined our payroll and leave management processes. The interface is intuitive, and it’s very convenient to manage everything in one place. While the initial setup was a bit lengthy and the mobile experience can sometimes be a little slow, overall, it’s been a reliable and effective solution for our needs.
I like that the availability in using Rippling at any given time is useful to me. Getting on the site freely when I need gives me security of knowing that I can be in control of viewing health insurance and hours information. I have yet to get any errors in using the Rippling app.
The product performs well. As with any software there are bugs and system enhancements needed, but there are channels in place to let Epicor know what they are so they can add to future versions. Open Enrollment and Salary Planning can be a bit slow at times.
Rippling's performance has been great, no errors or glitches yet so far. I am confident that Going from one page to the next and all its complexity usage does not lag or times out, it works effectively and efficiently. While using Rippling and other apps it does not tend to slow it down, works great. No complaints.
The customer support is terrible. When we open cases, it takes weeks to get the development team to have the first look at the case. If development is required, their team commits on a delivery date and up to now—those dates were never respected. They don't do any follow up. Customer service is very bad. When we request an update on the development progress, nobody answers!
When I did have to reach out to Rippling for assistance I was able to get quick help and my problem resolved in a time efficient manner with out any type of hick up. The customer support team is professional, kind and always available. This makes Rippling more welcoming to use on a daily basis.
We had someone from Epicor come on site to do training, and we "shared" our trainer with another company who was also doing the same major upgrade. It was nice to have another company there so we could ask each other (and the trainer) questions. This allowed for more meaningful discussions during training.
As stated earlier, you won't find all of the problems and things that you would like to improve on until you implement. After go-live, you then will have a long period of adjustment as you get the data and processes to work the way that you really want them to.
It's really easy to implement in comparison to other tools or applications. Different key points are easily configured and implemented as per need, having different configurations in systems. Implementation is something which binds the different parameters of an organization in a single row. Implementation of rippling is much easier, quicker, and error free than any other software. I recommend it strongly!
After a failed implementation with Open4, we needed a solution that was more usable with our end-users. The outdated system provided by one of ADP's products needed to be replaced. We chose Epicor HCM because we were enticed by the functionality it provided and ease of use, as well as its ability to be integrated with Epicor ERP, a product which we had owned and used for several years.
We switched from Gusto to Rippling and I wish we would've done it years ago. Rippling is so much more robust than Gusto and has made the lives of our HR team and each of our employees so much easier! I'd recommend Rippling over Gusto to every organization without any hesitation
Performance is not noticeably impacted by adding more users. Microsoft IIS and SQL are Epicor HCM's underlying technology and have proven reliability. In addition, IS staff are easy to find that know these technologies.
I can go on here and see all my hours and pto plus health benefits. I like to have the work handbook handy to refer to legal things. How to work my role within it's limits. Being able to put in my hours and view when they are approved is a huge benefit for me.
Report deadlines must always be extended as my organization's HR team must manually comb through the data for inaccuracies.
Reports generated lack integrity. For example, I sent a report to a large donor and the report eliminated nearly 100 employees unbeknownst to my department.
My organization is still waiting to see the ROI on Epicor. It hasn't been able to meet our basic needs.
Routine things like PTO requests and document uploads now take a few clicks instead of hours of email back‑and‑forth. I’d estimate I spend at least half the time on those tasks compared to before, which frees me up to actually help employees.
What used to drag on for days now gets done in a morning - I've just asked them this now. New hires can log in, set up their tools, and start training almost immediately, so they’re productive much sooner.
Payroll and benefits errors used to pop up regularly, but now I almost never have to fix things or follow up on missing info. That means less stress for me and for everyone involved.
Having everything in one platform cuts out the “where did you send that?” and “who approves this?” questions. It feels like we’ve reduced our back‑and‑forth by at least a third.