Esker vs. Quadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Esker
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Esker is a global cloud platform built to unlock strategic value for finance and customer service professionals and strengthen collaboration between companies by automating the cash conversion cycle. Esker’s mission is to build a foundation that promotes positive-sum growth, increased productivity, improved employee engagement, and greater trust between organizations.N/A
Quadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Quadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks is an accounts payable solution that uses custom rules to automate and show every step of an organization's AP workflow, and is used to route POs, invoices, and payment approvals.N/A
Pricing
EskerQuadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EskerQuadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EskerQuadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks
User Ratings
EskerQuadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EskerQuadient Accounts Payable by Beanworks
Likelihood to Recommend
I would recommend Esker based on the automation of invoice sending - it is very nice to have a tool that not only stores all of the contact info, but sends the invoices out as well. The tracking feature is great to have to see if the submission was successful. I do think that overall it could be much more user-friendly, but once you know what you're doing, it is not hard software to use.
Read full review
The one part I would suggest approval in is when updating an invoice. If for example, one employee approved an invoice and then I, the administrator, make a change before the second employee approves an invoice the invoice is resubmitted to the original employee. It would be much easier if the invoice would only go to the secondary/final approver even once a change is made
Read full review
Pros
  • Everything is electronic and every manager receives an email each morning telling them how many invoices they need to approve.
  • It has completely removed paper form the Accounts payable process and automatically archives invoices for the mandatory period required by Inland Revenue.
  • For monthly reporting there is visibility over what has not yet been included in the accounts and staff can follow with the tardy managers.
Read full review
  • It's easy to access.
  • It's simple to use.
  • It works well with QuickBooks.
Read full review
Cons
  • We can't enter credit memos in Esker. Need to enter in SAP and then link.
  • PO invoices that were trained to go into the PO bucket, route into the non-PO buckets.
  • Freight invoices that have had hundreds going into the non-PO bucket have a tendency to route to the PO-bucket because a PO number is referenced on page 7.
Read full review
  • Updating Approval Channels
Read full review
Usability
Esker does everything that it promises to do, but it is very hard to figure out. I am a very tech-savvy person, but I needed extensive training to be able to use the basic functions of Esker. Once you know what you're doing, it's not too hard, but I don't understand why they couldn't make it easier to use.
Read full review
Beanworks takes some time to set up initially, but once it's ready on your computer, it is very easy to use in conjunction with QuickBooks. They have representatives that are readily available or can schedule an appointment to walk you through it if you are ever having issues. Uploading invoices is quick and easy. Approvers can easily make changes to coding before approving.
Read full review
Support Rating
They have been very helpful and the online support site is awesome. They keep the site up to date with the latest changes and present challenges to keep learning the new updates to keep things entertaining. They are overall a great crew to work with
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We investigated Readsoft early in our exploration of upgrade options. We were on Esker DeliveryWare, but the UI for Readsoft, at the time, seemed to be a little convoluted and geared towards exception handling and required tiered users. Also, Readsoft was more cost prohibitive and did not have a solution for our faxing. Though, as I understand it, they may have since found a solution for this issue
Read full review
I have not used a system like Beanworks before -- this is my first -- but it is a great tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We now have reporting available down to the individual field level (changes, errors, etc) and can calculate cost to serve.
  • It replaced on-premise hardware with cloud SaaS that is more cost effective and risk adverse.
  • It is more intuitive; we can put new hires on order entry and experience less user errors. As a solution owner who fixes problems and answers questions, I don't find myself having to "think" about Esker and it has become a smaller part of my job now that end-users are more self-sufficient.
Read full review
  • Organized data
  • Clearer financial statements
  • Bills paid more timely
Read full review
ScreenShots