Everhour vs. UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Everhour
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Everhour is a time tracker equipped with project & team management features. Everhour integrates with project management apps so users can track time on tasks right from its interface: Asana, Basecamp, Trello, Jira, ClickUp, Basecamp, Notion, Todoist, GitHub, GitLab, etc. Its time tracking features provide options for timekeeping and time management. It helps to facilitate a team's time tracking experience by adding reminders, auto stop timers, start and stop timers, and…
$0
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
UKG Workforce Central (formerly Kronos Workforce Central) was a suite of HR Management offerings targeted mainly at enterprise customers with larger-scale and more complex HR and workforce management issues. The product is discontinued.N/A
Pricing
EverhourUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Lite
$6.00
per month per user
Team
$10.00
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EverhourUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EverhourUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Everhour
Chose Everhour
The native time tracking in Monday. Com is atrocious. It's unreliable and difficult to use. Everhour is convenient and accurate
Chose Everhour
I used another one that I can't recall the name right now. It was complicated and did not get the job done.
Chose Everhour
Generally ClickUp offers the same time recording tool like Everhour and I haven't used that much. On the other hand, Slack receives notifications from both integrations. The better competitor of Everhour is QuickBooks Payroll, it is more in detail and tracks the technician …
Chose Everhour
Toggl is also super great, but Everhour is so tightly integrated from a UX perspective with Asana, it's tough to use anything else.
Chose Everhour
Haven't tried many but use a couple of project management apps to organize tasks and be able to track things with the wider team.
Chose Everhour
Everhour is far superior to Harvest, which has poor Asana integration and hasn't been appreciably updated in years.
Chose Everhour
Everhour provides a more comprehensive view, more easily integrates with our other tools, and provides a more digestible report which makes billing a breeze. The user experience is also a significant improvement.
Chose Everhour
Another department uses Toggl. We reviewed it before choosing Everhour. Everhour had better integrations and better reporting even 2 years ago than Toggl. Everhour has continued to expand and enhance the features that make it a better solution. We implemented it in a couple …
Chose Everhour
Most other time tracking apps comes bundled with project management features. Although this seems more budget-friendly, it also gives a half-cooked time tracking feature, as normally the apps focus more on the project management features which arguably are more complex. My …
Chose Everhour
Everhour is the most user-friendly time tracking app that we have used, which is more motivating for employees to continue using it. We'll often have hundreds of tasks being worked on during a given day, and we love that Everhour makes it simple to integrate into Asana (our …
Chose Everhour
I've only ever used FunctionFox but Everhour is definitely better. It has a much friendlier user interface and is much easier to use for reporting and client billing.
Chose Everhour
Harvest's Asana integration was bulky and made us do the work twice whereas Everhour made it easy to integrate with Asana.
Chose Everhour
In our decision making process, we investigated a number of different providers of time management/tracking software. We chose Everhour due to deep API integrations with various pieces of 3rd party software packages, in particular our Project Management tool ASANA, which is …
Chose Everhour
I've used other applications, and Everhour is by far the most robust in functionality.
UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
UKG Workforce Central advertises itself as a more complete system, and it is. The main area of need for us at the time was the ability to manage overtime on the fly. It does that well enough.

The integration with job boards is just OK. It could be better as it is not as fluid …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
In comparison to Kronos, UKG Workforce Central offers an enhanced user experience. Employees are notified of their schedules for the coming weeks. The system allows users to view the work schedule of others on their team for that day, making shift swapping more convenient.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Most of the business simply used manual timesheets and Microsoft Excel to track time and attendance before we acquired UKG Workforce Central.
Obviously this method of tracking is very prone to user error and manipulation. UKG Workforce Central has been a revolution for us in …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We looked this product first and actually started the conversion process before we realized it could not do some essential functions we needed. One of the simple ones was allowing for employees to select to clock in or out and not just assume the direction based on their …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
UKG Workforce Central (formerly Kronos Workforce Central) is really an all-in-one solution that can be used to solve a myriad of issues: workforce management, scheduling, integration, self service, time and attendance, absenteeism, lateness, compliance, HR, payroll, data …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos Workforce Central is a robust software and is very easy for everyone to use. From management to employees, each person plays their part in using the software and our department was able to learn how to use it right away. We are constantly still learning new things but …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I used Oracle People Soft HCM for four years at my last organization and rarely had a good day with it. While I was not part of the selection process for Kronos as it was already in use at my new organization when I began there, I have found Kronos much simpler to use. Many of …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I'm just a user - not involved in the selection process.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Since I have been employed at my job, we have never used anything other than Kronos Workforce Central and it's perfect for what we need. I believe it was selected before I became an employee here and I know that the process of finding products, this one would have been chosen …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos Workforce Central had a more straightforward way to use it and a more user-friendly platform. Kronos Workforce Central had better pricing than UltiPro.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos Workforce Central and Calabrio One are used for two completely different tasks, so it's hard to compare the two.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We believe ADP would have been easier to implement but Kronos was more cost-effective.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We have had Kronos timekeeping for many years, and before this we used a very manual process. I was not a part of the team that chose the Kronos timekeeping system, so I really cannot say what other systems were considered for this application, if any. Kronos has done the job …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
The company implemented Kronos long before I took my role, but I have been present for the upgrades to the system. I have also used other versions of Kronos in my past roles. Workforce Central is definitely the more modernized version of Kronos. It definitely has its issues, …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
There were some functionalities in Kronos that we needed that the other systems did not have readily available or easily deployable.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Kronos is the only company that isn’t company owned that I’ve used. I’ve used it at two different companies and really enjoy it.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
We evaluated Paychex, Paycor, and Kronos and ending up choosing Kronos essentially because they had the best salespeople.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)

Kronos and Dayforce are the two timekeeping systems I’ve worked with in recent years. Kronos feels a little more comprehensive and is my primary timekeeping tool both for myself as well as my staff. Kronos is a great tool for a wide range of shifts, working locations, and pay …

Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
During my tenure at my organization we've only used Kronos and have not considered moving to another application to document employee time.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
KRONOS is by far one of the best, if not THE best multi-faceted systems I have used. Right up there with ADP but slightly better for what I needed it for.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Other than Kronos, I've only used Oracle Peoplesoft HCM for time and attendance. In comparing the two, I find that Kronos is far more high-end and busy and complicated, whereas PeopleSoft is simpler and to the point. With Kronos, there is some refining to do to it to get the …
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Can't compare. Quickbooks was easy, but lacked functional reporting which is essential to manage employee time.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
WFC was and still is - the best single point HR/PR and Timekeeping system on the market - bottom line.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I have not been involved in the product selection process.
Chose UKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
I've worked with this when it was called e-time. Nowhere near as good as Kronos.
Best Alternatives
EverhourUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Traqq
Traqq
Score 9.1 out of 10
When I Work
When I Work
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
TimeClock Plus
TimeClock Plus
Score 9.5 out of 10
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Zoho People
Zoho People
Score 8.4 out of 10
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EverhourUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.7
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EverhourUKG Workforce Central (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Everhour is useful in every environment where you need the measure of time for certain tasks. In most cases, this could be project management but it could also include trips or travels, conferences, congresses, or several other things that you need to take control of the time used. Its less appropriate if you are going to measure things in weeks or days, it's better to measure smaller pieces of time like minutes of hours, so you could have a more useful metrics to work with.
Read full review
We use Kronos Workforce Central only for it's timekeeping and scheduling/forecasting capabilities. It absolutely meets our needs for these areas. The reporting functionality also serves us well; exporting reports in excel covers the needs for most teams that use the system. Finally, business leaders and local HR crews are able to run reports on the teams they support.
Read full review
Pros
  • It has a genius dashboard with all real-time traffic information of all team members. It is a very useful tool as well to track efficiency for both in-house and remote team members
  • It has well-done integration with Asana (and other task-managers) which allows you to track time on tasks without switching between apps or tools which it truly awesome
  • It has a scheduling tool which allows you to plan long term traffic of all your team members by using Asana projects and tasks so there is no need to copy and paste the same story points between different systems
  • It has flexible reporting system which allows you to build very custom project time tracking report based on your needs (any field or table type can be customized and you wish)
Read full review
  • As a full service hospital there can be demands of staff to respond to high census or staffing shortages. Kronos has offered great utilization in floating hours between units and departments, identifying direct or indirect patient care hours, and ultimately offering analytics to clinical and operational leaders. This ability to specifically move hours while at work is exceptional for reporting and planning purposes across the organization.
  • The self-managed and leader managed options of an employee’s time card is of huge benefit. As a 24/7 hour operation it is critical that each individual is accountable for their own timekeeping. Kronos allows each employee to manage and submit adjustment, updates, and changes while at work without having to have their manager do it for them. The proceeding approval/acceptance process with these changes is well established and easy to authenticate.
  • The ability to access and navigate the user interface is very friendly and forgiving. Other systems can be quite cumbersome and hard to navigate, update, and easily change, but Kronos is pretty straight forward both for users and administrators. This ability to easily orient new team members and managers has been a great benefit to the organization.
Read full review
Cons
  • An integration with the desktop version of Asana would be useful, as many of our employees use that version.
  • A reminder when a task has been running for a while would be useful too, as the user could have forgotten to turn off the timer
  • Multiple tasks running simultaneously would be useful, as many times we solve some problems while we are reunited or complete some tasks while other processes are running.
Read full review
  • Training required to use the product effectively, not simple at first
  • Dependent on Java, frequent updates to Java necessary to continue using the Kronos platform
  • Reporting tools are extensive and solid, though some reports can only be extracted in PDF, not in the more usable Excel format. How Kronos determines which can be extracted in Excel vs. PDF, I can't tell.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Now that the system is installed and operational, the "pain is gone"...therefore we see no reason to change to a different application. There is no functionality that is missing from the system that would drive us to consider another solution at this time. Maintenance support from Kronos is sufficient and updates occur regularly.
Read full review
Usability
Everhour's overall usability is definitely one of its key strengths. The UI is intuitive and clean, making time tracking feel less "technical" than other solutions we've tried. Our entire team, including less tech-savvy contractors, found it easy to use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
In the almost 2 1/2 years we have had to contact support 1 time and it really was for a feature request. Their support team responded quickly and told us that the feature was going to be added in the next few months. We have had no support issues ever. I have never had a time tracking solution that has had no issues until Everhour.
Read full review
Kronos Workforce Central's support is amazing! From the support the software alone gives our department to the customer service team, we have never been more thorough as we are now. There are plenty of trainings provided and assistance is always there when you need it. The launching process was very detailed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
When evaluating other systems, we compared Everhour against Toggl Track and JIRA. Toggl Track offered robust reporting but felt too feature-heavy for our contractor management needs. It was also a bit more difficult to use. JIRA's time tracking, while powerful for development teams, was overly complex for us and had too much overhead.
Read full review
We looked this product first and actually started the conversion process before we realized it could not do some essential functions we needed. One of the simple ones was allowing for employees to select to clock in or out and not just assume the direction based on their schedule or last punch. With bus drivers working multiple routes or shifts this was imperative that they be able to select this as while they may forget one punch being able to select the direction helps identify where the missing punches are. I'm hoping this has since been corrected because it absolutely floored me that such a relatively simple thing was not an option.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Simplifies end-of-month billing processes and reduces manual entry
  • Quicker team onboarding due to consistent time tracking structure between Asana & Everhour
  • Improved productivity due to Asana integration as tasks can be reassigned and tracked by multiple team members, regardless of who is assigned to the task (good for collaboration between team members)
Read full review
  • Kronos is much more expensive than the previous systems we were using, so at this point the ROI is negative. The idea is that it will allow us to scale and grow the company more easily so time will tell if that is the case.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Everhour Screenshots

Screenshot of Keep track of projects, set budgets and alerts, split billable and non-billable hoursScreenshot of Track time from the website, from a browser toolbar and inside project management toolsScreenshot of Create tasks, track time, and update progress in one place.Screenshot of Track staff related expenses and invoice billable expenses to clients with integrated invoicingScreenshot of Create invoices from the logged work just in a few clicks. Watch the reported time and the accurate time invoiced.